BurningHamster

<p>Anyone know what causes companies to end relationships?</p><p> </p><p> I've got two companies who start the game with a friendly relationship and one sends workers on excursions to the other. Always within the first week or so they end the relationship and become hostile. They are located in very different game regions and I cannot figure out what the cause of this could be.</p>

I think adding it for eras makes sense as TV tapings in the old days never had crowds like RAW and Nitro in the Monday night wars for example. Perhaps even having an option of different types of TV shows rather than just A and B to maybe bring in an option for studio wrestling shows that run in set locations to small crowds rather than the usual WWE style TV shows from arenas.

I've noticed an excessive amount of new tag teams being formed during gameplay. When a company already has several, the AI doesn't need to increase the number up to 16 or so or put top singles guys into regular tag teams. Could this please be taken into consideration?

It would indeed. I think I've already asked for all the skill filters to be added. Would make modding a lot faster as balancing out popularity is a huge part of it and it seems like a an oversight that this is not in there already.

<blockquote data-ipsquote="" class="ipsQuote" data-ipsquote-username="forlan" data-cite="forlan" data-ipsquote-contentapp="forums" data-ipsquote-contenttype="forums" data-ipsquote-contentid="49922" data-ipsquote-contentclass="forums_Topic"><div>Im not sure on AI but obviously you can change it on your own. As WWF did not have a women's division and WCW had a women's champion but no womens division to speak of (i tried giving them one but they hire like 12 women) its a strange situation.</div></blockquote><p> </p><p> This is one of the biggest annoyances I have had with TEW for a long time. Womens divisions are so absurdly large there is no way to replicate the fact that up until relatively recently, a women's division was 2-4 women in a lot of promotions.</p>

Weight split requires too large a roster, too many lightweights. Didn't work realistically in 2016 doesn't work realistically in 2020. Make it smaller plz

Seriously? Oh ffs! First was Adam saying that he dropped submissions and chain wrestling because they were never individually calculated so condensing it to just technical made sense ... AFTER so many mod makers had put work into individually entering these skills for so many workers and now learning basics means almost nothing. I think basics should mean something in the state of the game, a tiered reduction or boost to match rating which can vary depending on the company product. Honestly, things like this are really disappointing and discouraging.

This is something that has been bit of an issue in 2016 too but I was a bit disappointed to see it had not been addressed for 2020. It appears as though there is still no option to set a company to add a womens division by narrative at a certain date which makes it very tricky to create mods that run somewhat akin to reality. Also, there is still no option to have a truly small womens division. If you have no popularity at all, it appears to be 6-8 is a "small" division but this grows to 12-15 by the time a company is small which is just way too large to reflect reality. I'd like to see an option added to reflect how women's wrestling has been treated for large chunks of history. "Not a focus" - As in, there CAN be women's wrestling but it is not something the company focuses on. They will have no problem having only 2-4 women's wrestlers on the roster at any one time regardless of company size and will not feel the need to put women's wrestling on every show. Alternatively perhaps having women's wrestling as "Special Attraction" where only occasionally will a company have women's matches maybe using it more for big shows just for something different.

Would it be possible to get some even smaller roster size options for owners? Even if it does result in a penalty for the AI company? (not sure if that is a thing) When trying to set promotion size to get somewhat realistic attendances, a lot of the smaller companies start requiring rosters significantly larger than they had in reality. Smaller Japanese companies/Joshi promotions often had 12-18 people on their rosters but would be in the range of what I would consider a mid-size small company based on attendance. Alternatively, could we get a boost to attendance for smaller companies on touring shows. It feels very low at the moment for some to get 100-150 people per show as a lot of touring companies ran mostly these tour shows and relatively few big annual or monthly shows.

I've noticed this too, even with some gimmicks I give very low percentage to. Raven would keep ending up back with WWF as Johnny Polo!

<blockquote data-ipsquote="" class="ipsQuote" data-ipsquote-username="D-Lyrium" data-cite="D-Lyrium" data-ipsquote-contentapp="forums" data-ipsquote-contenttype="forums" data-ipsquote-contentid="47568" data-ipsquote-contentclass="forums_Topic"><div>As far as I know, pre-game history is basically cosmetic. It's true that a worker won't usually want to rejoin a company he's recently left, but I don't think that takes into account companies he worked for before the game started.</div></blockquote><p> </p><p> Thanks man.</p>

Does employment history have any function, such as effecting if a worker will sign for a company that he has just left, or is it purely cosmetic?

Damn, this looks promising.

Hey man, I never said numbers couldn't remain, and if you look at my follow up to LloydCross I said it would be desirable to have the option to represent it many ways. Everyone has their preferences and their reasons for having them. I haven't kept up with the discussion on why TEW2020 has numbers for everything and you can no longer represent those differently. I also always preferred when worker skills could be descriptions and I would set scouting to 8 or below so I could get them, or had a grade option. It's just TEW2020 can be bit of a bitch if you have dyscalculia.

Honestly, a description is better than a number to me if done properly. But seriously, the star system is pretty established in wrestling and so feels like the most logical way to present it. If a program can generate a number, surely there has to be a way to visually represent that by certain number ranges aligning to a grade, a star rating, a description, whatever alternative is desirable. Hell, I think having the option to be able to use any/all of those methods to judge a match/show is desirable.