Jump to content

Moe Hunter

Members
  • Posts

    2,045
  • Joined

Everything posted by Moe Hunter

  1. Yep, placement mode works even better than how I envisioned it. It uses the right-click to select, but I had been stuck in "use one set of up/down arrows", whereas being able to insert or swap to any position is absolutely optimal. Bravo, Adam!
  2. <p>That's a great feature, refusal to work with someone who injured them. </p><p> </p><p> I just checked regular enemies in a tag match, no issues. Not that I think there should be, just noticing that workers don't really have any opinion on how they're booked outside of who they win/lose to.</p><p> </p><p> I'd be so into workers having opinions on gimmicks, teams, disposition, etc.</p>
  3. I would absolutely love this, it would add a lot of depth to making workers feel like people (the talk to worker feature is a great start). I imagine it might take a fair bit of coding/tuning, but man I would dig it, having to field suggestions, requests or even "ultimatums" from my roster. As it stands, you can put any gimmick on any worker and aside from it being a poor gimmick, workers don't complain. I should check, but I think you can even put enemies in a tag team and it doesn't necessarily lead to bad results...
  4. Currently all the positives are listed first, then all the negatives. I'm fine either way.
  5. I jumped in as a player 3 weeks into a save, used auto-booker and the main event got the penalty "this is the 6th time this match has been put on recently, so it needed to be better". So it's not just the auto-booker but also the AI booking that falls on repetitive match-ups.
  6. Just to reiterate an idea I had of how this could work with the current interface... It seems like it should be possible to right-click a segment (or even multiple segments if you want to be fancy), and move it up/down with a single set of arrows. Think of how Mass Editing works in the editor - if I'm not mistaken, that screen has the same kind of functionality. I think that would be not just a compromise, but an overall improvement.
  7. It would be cool if it was tied to your product, or if you can set a default per player in any game.
  8. This isn't a Tech Support issue, but all the same... If you're talking about a WM31 situation, you would book a triple threat match between Reigns, Lesnar and Rollins, then add the Road Agent Note "Late Addition" for Rollins. It's a feature specifically designed for mid-match cash-ins.
  9. Fully agree! I'd be far more inclined to use on-the-fly booking with something to see and manage in real-time.
  10. Absolutely agree. So many of my workers complain about being scripted, I would love the option to have it default to unscripted.
  11. While we're at it, can the harsh yellow for angles in match results screens get changed to something less jarring? With a lot of how the AI books, it makes it difficult to focus on the actual match results.
  12. If we can't get an option for the old list style for this screen, it seems an alternative could be right-clicking a segment to highlight it, then using a universal set of arrows. Heck, this could even allow for selecting and moving multiple segments at a time, which would then be an overall upgrade!
  13. It is bizarre, slicing up so thinly what used to be available at a glance. Especially when the Attributes section is right next to it and often needs scrolling to see it all. The screen real estate could be used a whole lot better.
  14. Daniel Bryan Shawn Michaels Becky Lynch (since the K-Nox days!) Chris Jericho CM Punk
  15. The resolution of the program has changed, so even if otherwise the UI was the same (which it definitely won't be), new skins would be necessary.
  16. What sub-ten minute Lesnar match do you think *should* get more than 80/100? The one where he does the same move over and over, and then maybe his opponent does the same? Or the one where he does one move and then it's over?
  17. Back in TEW2007, I hired a promising young talent... Rebecca Knox. I looked up her stuff online and became a big fan. She retired soon after, then seven years later got a developmental contract with WWE, and ended up main eventing Wrestlemania. Absolutely surreal looking back on it. All through her hiatus I would always have her on my roster in-game!
  18. <p>"The Undertaker" has had a whole bunch of different gimmicks as The Undertaker, though. The most obvious changes being the 2000-2004 period affectionately known as "American Badass" or "Biker Taker".</p><p> </p><p> Him not being able to use the name outside WWE wouldn't prevent him from getting over, nor using whatever gimmick he was running at the time.</p>
  19. I hope there is a small % of the time where a worker changes their mind when it comes down to the moment of truth. Not a common thing, and possibly based on personality, where they'll say one thing to your face and screw you over on the big day.
  20. <p>I love all the new additions to Brands!</p><p> </p><p> If I'm reading it right, this might have snuck in a significant feature in my mind... We can have color coded text in lists such as the Roster now?</p>
  21. <blockquote data-ipsquote="" class="ipsQuote" data-ipsquote-username="awesomenessofme1" data-cite="awesomenessofme1" data-ipsquote-contentapp="forums" data-ipsquote-contenttype="forums" data-ipsquote-contentid="46105" data-ipsquote-contentclass="forums_Topic"><div>If we can book road agent notes ahead of time, does that mean we get feedback ahead of time? That would be a big help in dealing with creative control and worker morale.</div></blockquote><p> That would be great, and much more reflective of reality. Instead of being on the show day and finding out that the guy you want to lose doesn't want to lose, you could plan it in advance and change plans (and the booking leading up to the match).</p>
  22. That's already in the game, represented by Company Relationships (Non-Aggression, War, etc).
  23. I'm hoping that in amongst momentum being a strong factor in how crowds perceive workers, that there's some way to replicate underdog popularity. Tye Dillinger loses every NXT match and eventually gets over to the point where new guys get booed tor beating him on their way in. Becky Lynch went about a year (at least twice) with no notable victories, always losing feuds and getting pushed aside, but always had the crowd's support. She was on a quiet winning streak just before she hit it big, but again it was a high-profile loss that pushed her over the edge... It can't always be a case of losses equalling popularity/momentum loss.
  24. <blockquote data-ipsquote="" class="ipsQuote" data-ipsquote-username="Supermercado" data-cite="Supermercado" data-ipsquote-contentapp="forums" data-ipsquote-contenttype="forums" data-ipsquote-contentid="46105" data-ipsquote-contentclass="forums_Topic"><div>Love the idea of a one-sided war a'la TNA vs WWE on Monday night when the E paid them no attention.</div></blockquote><p> </p><p> Exactly what I thought of. I wonder if you can access the Dirty Tricks with a company who is ignoring your war declaration - that would sum up many eras of TNA perfectly.</p>
  25. <blockquote data-ipsquote="" class="ipsQuote" data-ipsquote-username="smw88" data-cite="smw88" data-ipsquote-contentapp="forums" data-ipsquote-contenttype="forums" data-ipsquote-contentid="46105" data-ipsquote-contentclass="forums_Topic"><div>Not for the area (national battles)</div></blockquote><p> </p><p> So you would set up your areas to reflect your view of what gets over within them. AJPW and NJPW would be performance based, WWE and WCW would be popularity based.</p><p> </p><p> You can also already set up areas and eras to prefer different product types.</p><p> </p><p> There's no need for an extra layer here.</p>
×
×
  • Create New...