Jump to content

djlightning

Members
  • Posts

    854
  • Joined

About djlightning

  • Birthday 12/17/1977

djlightning's Achievements

Newbie

Newbie (1/14)

  • Week One Done
  • One Month Later
  • One Year In

Recent Badges

10

Reputation

  1. So for sometime now it's bothered me that with most upgrade levels on a broadcaster it would be cheaper to just build a new broadcaster at the next level than to upgrade your current broadcaster. Now I get that there should be extra cost involved in upgrading existing stuff that you wouldn't have with building new, but it should never be cheaper to build a whole new company than to upgrade your current company that already has a lot of the required assets the new company would need. My suggest would be take the cost of building a new broadcaster at that level, multiply it by a set value between 1.1-1.25 and then subtract the value of building a new broadcaster 1 level lower. Ex. Building a new Big broadcaster in the USA cost $8,275,000 to upgrade to Big from Medium currently cost $9,487,500. Using this new method at 25% additional cost (1.25 modifier) to upgrade to Big would cost $7,018,750. If you had previously built your Broadcaster at the Medium ($3,325,000) level you total cost would now stand at $10,343,750. Still more costly that if you had originally built a Big network, but the upgrade still cheaper than shutting down your current network and just building a new one. At the current level starting a network at Tiny in one zone and upgrading it fully to Enormous would cost 223% of just building it new at that size. Under this new method at 10% additional it would be 119% and at 25% additional cost it would be 149%. Still more than if you just build new, but significant savings over the current and it would make more since too.
  2. So for sometime now it's bothered me that with most upgrade levels on a broadcaster it would be cheaper to just build a new broadcaster at the next level than to upgrade your current broadcaster. Now I get that there should be extra cost involved in upgrading existing stuff that you wouldn't have with building new, but it should never be cheaper to build a whole new company than to upgrade your current company that already has a lot of the required assets the new company would need. My suggest would be take the cost of building a new broadcaster at that level, multiply it by a set value between 1.1-1.25 and then subtract the value of building a new broadcaster 1 level lower. Ex. Building a new Big broadcaster in the USA cost $8,275,000 to upgrade to Big from Medium currently cost $9,487,500. Using this new method at 25% additional cost (1.25 modifier) to upgrade to Big would cost $7,018,750. If you had previously built your Broadcaster at the Medium ($3,325,000) level you total cost would now stand at $10,343,750. Still more costly that if you had originally built a Big network, but the upgrade still cheaper than shutting down your current network and just building a new one. At the current level starting a network at Tiny in one zone and upgrading it fully to Enormous would cost 223% of just building it new at that size. Under this new method at 10% additional it would be 119% and at 25% additional cost it would be 149%. Still more than if you just build new, but significant savings over the current and it would make more since too.
  3. There are plenty of times to where they will go to a commercial mid match. The wrestlers don’t just stand there waiting for the cameras to come back on.
  4. Nice work there Reaper! Are those real diamonds? Lol
  5. Death Before Retirement - A very rare attribute but one that would reflect guys Like Bullet Bob Armstrong and Terry Funk that continued to wrestle into their 70s.
  6. <blockquote data-ipsquote="" class="ipsQuote" data-ipsquote-username="Wazza" data-cite="Wazza" data-ipsquote-contentapp="forums" data-ipsquote-contenttype="forums" data-ipsquote-contentid="51659" data-ipsquote-contentclass="forums_Topic"><div>I feel he is the C-Verse's Rock. So how can I get him for my SWF save, even though he has a 5 year contract with RAW, and without going to the editor????<p> </p><p> </p><p> HOOOOOOOOOOOW???</p></div></blockquote><p> </p><p> Use him as your User Character.</p>
  7. <blockquote data-ipsquote="" class="ipsQuote" data-ipsquote-username="Ciccio" data-cite="Ciccio" data-ipsquote-contentapp="forums" data-ipsquote-contenttype="forums" data-ipsquote-contentid="51647" data-ipsquote-contentclass="forums_Topic"><div>I was playing with my save yesterday and something that got me thinking happened. Basically, I'm playing with TheWho87 mod and using AEW, and WWE and NJPW offered some contracts to some of my workers, who had contracts with me and AAA. I think that if I'm competing against WWE to keep my worker under my company, the game should not give me the block because I have a deal with AAA that we can't steal from each other. I mean, we both lose the worker if the other company signs him.<p> </p><p> Another thing I was thinking is, wouldn't be cool if there was a particular speech to a worker to make him take a worker under his wings?</p></div></blockquote><p> </p><p> I can think of a gamy work around for the first one, use the in game editor, make his/her AAA contract for only 1 day. Then compete with WWE for the worker the following day. (Alternatively you could try to see if you can get him to sign a long-term non-exclusive ironclad with you over the WWE/NJPW exclusive deals.)</p><p> </p><p> For the second you can currently just create that relationship, but would be cool to have the talk to option. </p><p> </p><p> I would totally be in favor of both of these things being changed in the normal game play though.</p>
  8. So I just finished my first year running entirely in patch 1.17 and after. Using a very barebones roster of my UC 3 wrestlers average salaries of $30 per show each no referee and Honest Frank (owner) working for free. The economy was above 50 the whole time and the industry above 70, but because of the reduction to growth rate I finished the year $3k in the hole. Without an increase to the starting company finances I don’t believe this challenge will be feasible anymore.
  9. What version of TEW are you using? It sounds like you're using a very old patch that doesn't include some of the additional products. You'll probably want to update your patch.
  10. Another work around if you're wanting to change something in a game you're currently playing is at the beginning of a month make that save a database, then go make the changes in the database editor and start a new game from where the old one left off.
  11. I feel like after Patch 1.17 the starting money for this needs to be adjusted as it's not possible to avoid bankruptcy with a 0 pop company with only $1000 anymore. Before you could start turning a profit around month five, but now that is more like month ten or eleven and then they close you down at put you out of business in month fourteen.
  12. Additionally what they are asking for “We want at least 3 episodes and what you promise them doesn’t entirely jive either. As if you were to run the old weekly PPV TNA in early 2000s. And you said 3 episodes your contract would end in less than a month. Seems like there should be a way to promise at least x not just exactly X.
  13. Hey Reaper, glad to see you're back creating TEW titles. If you can, I'd like a World Championship, Tag Team Championship and Women's Championship for Rx4. Here is their logo. <img alt="mchqDk4.jpg" data-src="https://i.imgur.com/mchqDk4.jpg" src="<___base_url___>/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" />
  14. <blockquote data-ipsquote="" class="ipsQuote" data-ipsquote-username="thadian" data-cite="thadian" data-ipsquote-contentapp="forums" data-ipsquote-contenttype="forums" data-ipsquote-contentid="50793" data-ipsquote-contentclass="forums_Topic"><div>I strongly agree. I think Medium should get you to 60-70, Big 71-80, Very Big 81-90, Enormous 91-100.<p> </p><p> This type of range per coverage seems like it would be about fair. This means broadcasters would need bigger deals to get bigger coverage as intended, and would make bigger ones more meaningful.</p></div></blockquote><p> </p><p> You missed Huge, but I would be okay with Huge and Enormous both getting you to 100, as long as enormous is faster and generates more money.</p>
×
×
  • Create New...