TheProdigy

<blockquote data-ipsquote="" class="ipsQuote" data-ipsquote-username="gayjesus" data-cite="gayjesus" data-ipsquote-contentapp="forums" data-ipsquote-contenttype="forums" data-ipsquote-contentid="44604" data-ipsquote-contentclass="forums_Topic"><div>Thanks for your answer, may I ask how you can induct someone into your own hall of fame? I can't find the option anywhere!</div></blockquote><p> </p><p> Go to your office and click on hall of fame which should be the first button on the last row. There you can click add or remove anyone you want as well as check for eligible candidates for your hall of fame where you will be given a prompt to have the option to induct them in right now before they've retired.</p>

<blockquote data-ipsquote="" class="ipsQuote" data-ipsquote-username="gayjesus" data-cite="gayjesus" data-ipsquote-contentapp="forums" data-ipsquote-contenttype="forums" data-ipsquote-contentid="44604" data-ipsquote-contentclass="forums_Topic"><div>What are the requirements for someone to end up in the Company Hall of Fame?<p> </p><p> And what are the requirements for someone to end up in the MMA hall of fame?</p><p> What are the differences? Can I induct someone into the company HoF?</p></div></blockquote><p> </p><p> You can check the editor for these. Basically they are required to get at least 100% and certain achievements give them a certain percentage. When they reach 100% they will be inducted into the Hall of Fame when they retire. The MMA Hall of Fame is more strict as you need even better versions of the same achievement. For example, winning a title at a company will add some credit towards making the company Hall of Fame, but you need to win a title in a company with at least National name value to gain credit towards making the MMA Hall of Fame. Yes, you can induct anyone into the company HoF even if they don't meet the requirements. I have done so for Raul Hughes and Tim Boyer for Gamma after they retired, because they were big names in the early years.</p>

<blockquote data-ipsquote="" class="ipsQuote" data-ipsquote-username="BrokenCycle" data-cite="BrokenCycle" data-ipsquote-contentapp="forums" data-ipsquote-contenttype="forums" data-ipsquote-contentid="44604" data-ipsquote-contentclass="forums_Topic"><div>Here's a question that means nothing to me because I have the setting off, but I'm still curious. <p> </p><p> If a fighter demands a fight, then you book them in a fight against someone else, do they complain about it and push you onto their demanded opponent?</p></div></blockquote><p> </p><p> Nope, I've never had someone complain about it. Maybe their morale goes down, but I haven't really ever checked that.</p>

Yeah I've basically raided Alpha-1 except showed some restraint by leaving them with a few fighters that aren't ones I have to have like Archer and Kitson. I follow a different philosophy where I usually cut someone after 3 straight losses to unranked people or 4-5 losses surrounding a win. This has kept my roster pretty stable at the higher end of 50 people, but it gives people something to fight for at the bottom and I know people who can make runs from the bottom come in with high momentum and decent name value.

<blockquote data-ipsquote="" class="ipsQuote" data-ipsquote-username="BrokenCycle" data-cite="BrokenCycle" data-ipsquote-contentapp="forums" data-ipsquote-contenttype="forums" data-ipsquote-contentid="44604" data-ipsquote-contentclass="forums_Topic"><div>What's the point of filtering by Reputation and Ranking in the Add Fight screen?<p> </p><p> Isn't Ranking mostly based on Reputation? I've only seen the two filters be different one time, and it was for two cans. They were next to each other and they just flopped positions.</p></div></blockquote><p> </p><p> You could have an older guy who's a big name, but his skill level has dropped or you could just have someone who's exciting, but doesn't necessarily win many fights, or his reputation grows faster than his ranking due to a lot of finishes. There's also rare cases where there's just a famous guy who picks up MMA. This applies to someone like Big Magic, who could easily hit National with a few wins, but he wouldn't be ranked.</p>

<blockquote data-ipsquote="" class="ipsQuote" data-ipsquote-username="kemicode" data-cite="kemicode" data-ipsquote-contentapp="forums" data-ipsquote-contenttype="forums" data-ipsquote-contentid="44604" data-ipsquote-contentclass="forums_Topic"><div>Can I edit specific injuries to a fighter to shorten them? I had my biggest draw in Huang embroiled in scandal while my big Featherweight championship was cancelled when Jokichi, the champ, tore his quad and is out for a year. Shame since he was dominating the division with wins over Li-Kong Ho (twice) and Lamont Banner (ending his undefeated streak).</div></blockquote><p> </p><p> Nope, I don't think you can edit injuries.</p>

<blockquote data-ipsquote="" class="ipsQuote" data-ipsquote-username="bshankly" data-cite="bshankly" data-ipsquote-contentapp="forums" data-ipsquote-contenttype="forums" data-ipsquote-contentid="44604" data-ipsquote-contentclass="forums_Topic"><div>Hi, I'm playing with BCF. Still at high level regional but popularity has risen to 92.2% . I still have the same PPV deal - United Kingdom Choice. At Medium size. <p> </p><p> Economy is at Strong and Rising. </p><p> I was getting PPV revenues of around 400k. One was 700k and one broke a million. </p><p> However In September of year one I tried running two PPV's in a month. Revenue dropped to 40k.</p><p> </p><p> Its still at that and I'm in february of year two.</p><p> </p><p> Attendences are still the same.</p><p> </p><p> I thought it was because of the multiple PPV's but it can't be. I've had a Low Level International Draw match in there and multiple National Draw Matchs. The same as before.</p><p> </p><p> Ive ran 4 events since I tried the double. So double in September, then october, november, January and February.</p><p> </p><p> The only other thing is I created an Internet Media Company for all other regions apart from the British Isles and I have been showing the PPV's on that as well. I'm going to run my next PPV without this and see if that is causing the problem. But surely it shouldn't be.</p><p> </p><p> Any other suggestions are appreciated.</p></div></blockquote><p> </p><p> It's definitely because of the internet media company. As for the exact reasoning, I don't remember off the top of my head, but I've seen this in a previous post, possibly for WMMA 4.</p>

Yes but you have to put it in your databases folder and import it into your save from that database.

<blockquote data-ipsquote="" class="ipsQuote" data-ipsquote-username="mattandbenny" data-cite="mattandbenny" data-ipsquote-contentapp="forums" data-ipsquote-contenttype="forums" data-ipsquote-contentid="44604" data-ipsquote-contentclass="forums_Topic"><div>Didn't want to post in technical as it may not be an error, however i'm finding a problem with the divisional rankings. One of my guys was ranked #6 at heavyweight. I gave him a bit of a warm up fight against somebody ranked around #23 or #24. He won via 1st round submission and dropped to #20 in the division. <p> </p><p> Seems crazy - that would be like Mark Hunt beating someone like Timothy Johnson in the 1st round then dropping 14 spots in the rankings.</p></div></blockquote><p> </p><p> Did you make a lot of new signings? Were other fighters in between fighting?</p>

<blockquote data-ipsquote="" class="ipsQuote" data-ipsquote-username="Adam Ryland" data-cite="Adam Ryland" data-ipsquote-contentapp="forums" data-ipsquote-contenttype="forums" data-ipsquote-contentid="44604" data-ipsquote-contentclass="forums_Topic"><div>No. You can gain more than 25%. However, there's a limit to how much you can gain when jumping levels, so although they're gaining 35% in your example they're using up some of that to make the level-up from Unknown to Regional.</div></blockquote><p> </p><p> Alright that's what I initially thought since that made some sense too. Thanks for the response.</p>

Is it only possible to gain 25% popularity at a time? I've had a few new signings that were unknown and after the fight, it says popularity has increased by 35.2% or something in the 30s, but their actual popularity has only gone up to 25% Low Regional from 0%.

<blockquote data-ipsquote="" class="ipsQuote" data-ipsquote-username="AlexB" data-cite="AlexB" data-ipsquote-contentapp="forums" data-ipsquote-contenttype="forums" data-ipsquote-contentid="44604" data-ipsquote-contentclass="forums_Topic"><div>Does the AI hiring aggression also affect their attitude on cutting fighters?<p> </p><p> I saw that it is by design that AI companies cut fighters more readily: I have the hiring agression on Very Aggressive, and am beginning to wonder if the trigger is being pulled a little too early now.</p><p> </p><p> <a href="http://www.greydogsoftware.com/forum/showpost.php?p=2275015&postcount=11" rel="external nofollow">http://www.greydogsoftware.com/forum/showpost.php?p=2275015&postcount=11</a></p></div></blockquote><p> </p><p> No. If you read the help info, it explains that hiring aggression only affects money and bonuses offered when hiring fighters so it just makes signing people more competitive with the AI. As for the Nathan Chambers case I can understand the cut because if you check his history, losing his first fight puts him at 5 losses in his last 7 fights.Even with his name value, a more aggressive company might cut him loose and hopes he can turn his career around before offering him a second chance. The companies are more aggressive in cutting than previous versions, but if you check the back history of those fighters from the year before, the people who get cut tend to still have decent names, but their performance has fallen off.</p>

You'll see some really good ones come up where you are right now but the frequency should increase starting in 2008, judging from the default database era settings.

<blockquote data-ipsquote="" class="ipsQuote" data-ipsquote-username="kemicode" data-cite="kemicode" data-ipsquote-contentapp="forums" data-ipsquote-contenttype="forums" data-ipsquote-contentid="44604" data-ipsquote-contentclass="forums_Topic"><div>Haven't played previous versions of WMMA and am only up to 2 years and a half in my save, how are the regens? Do they have the potential to be as good as the very best of the best at such a young age? I think of guys like Sukarno, Helio, Ivanov, Teneyev, Satinho, Manuel Silva, Atep as guys who are 30 years old or younger that are already among the elite most especially in terms of skills.</div></blockquote><p> </p><p> Well that's mostly dependent on your era settings. There is a distribution of different skill levels among the regens and it's quite possible that one of the talents will develop into a star at a young age. That being said, it's probably more rare in the earlier years as the regens won't come out as well rounded as the cream of the crop right now. They'll need pedigree and potential.</p>

<blockquote data-ipsquote="" class="ipsQuote" data-ipsquote-username="Jericho Rules" data-cite="Jericho Rules" data-ipsquote-contentapp="forums" data-ipsquote-contenttype="forums" data-ipsquote-contentid="44604" data-ipsquote-contentclass="forums_Topic"><div>Is there a particular reason for this?</div></blockquote><p> </p><p> Other than the fact that it hasn't been added in, none that I know of.</p>