Jump to content

kingjames

Members
  • Posts

    374
  • Joined

Everything posted by kingjames

  1. <p>I've been playing Planet Coaster on and off for a bit. I didn't pick up Roller Coaster Tycoon until years after it had been released, and that was only the third game. But I've really been enjoying Planet Coaster. I dunno. I guess...I mean, I'm a bit of a Bioware mark - and as for the comments previous, even if DA2 wasn't a spectacular masterpiece, I don't know that I've ever felt closer to a player character than I was to Victoria Hawke, the warrior whose snark and silliness covered a well of hurt, who loved a pirate queen and tried to see the good in everyone. But overall, the older I get...the less I want to play games about destruction. I don't know. The world is full of destruction and death and division. The older I get, the more I want to create and nurture.</p><p> </p><p> So, games like Planet Coaster, where I can create a park that makes virtual people happy? Or Stardew Valley, where I can turn overgrown and barren land into a living farm and help my neighbors? Or Cities: Skylines, where I can try to create a sustainable city of happy, healthy, educated citizens? Or, say, TEW 2016, where I can try and tell interesting stories and grow a company? They just appeal so much more to me than games about killing things at this point. Even the Bioware games, for me, have the appeal of trying to build something that brings people together for the common good. Maybe it's all very Pollyanna. But if there's an element of wish fulfillment in gaming, those are the kinds of wishes I'd like to see fulfilled. Maybe it goes without saying that people play the games they play for any number of reasons, and most reasons aren't any better than any other reasons, but I'll say it anyway.</p><p> </p><p> That was a tangent, sheesh. Back to the more immediate point. If anyone's been playing Planet Coaster and wants to share blueprints or whatever, I'd be intrigued to see what you've built!</p>
  2. <blockquote data-ipsquote="" class="ipsQuote" data-ipsquote-username="Greylocke" data-cite="Greylocke" data-ipsquote-contentapp="forums" data-ipsquote-contenttype="forums" data-ipsquote-contentid="25169" data-ipsquote-contentclass="forums_Topic"><div>New Day managed to develop an act that got over, but they initially got tonnes of "New Day Sucks" chant because everyone could tell that they were just 3 black guys whom Creative had nothing for and just randomly dumped together.</div></blockquote><p> </p><p> Among Michael Hayes' "greatest" hits, if I recall correctly, he once noted that if you were black and in the wrestling business then you didn't need a gimmick, because your gimmick was "being black". That they've worked this angle for Jinder & the Bollywood Boys, and Michael Hayes still has a job backstage for WWE, would not seem coincidental to me.</p>
  3. Is there any benefit to booking a match such that the match intensity and/or match danger is greater than the settings listed for your product? For instance, if my product's match intensity is 20% and match danger is 5%, would increasing the match intensity or match danger result in a potentially higher match grade?
  4. <blockquote data-ipsquote="" class="ipsQuote" data-ipsquote-username="iruleall15" data-cite="iruleall15" data-ipsquote-contentapp="forums" data-ipsquote-contenttype="forums" data-ipsquote-contentid="41194" data-ipsquote-contentclass="forums_Topic"><div>Also what movie has ever been 11 months long for a worker to be gone? That seems alot longer to be gone than needed.</div></blockquote><p> </p><p> Not that realism is exactly a goal with TEW, but depending on the film and the role, you may have some pre-production stuff (learning how to not look like a doofus holding a gun for an action movie, for instance), then there's location shooting and the nightmares that can go with that (pray your worker doesn't become involved in something like the filming of <em>Apocalypse Now</em>), post-production stuff like ADR or reshoots, then there's all the press junkets to promote the movie that's usually part of the contract someone signs... so, though the shooting (hopefully!) wouldn't be 11 months, 11 months for the entire process isn't out of the question at all!</p>
  5. Hello! I have a request for an alt, but it's part of a storyline I haven't written up yet, so I don't want to say who it is and spoil things. It'd be just one picture. If you would be willing to help out, I would be immensely grateful and when the pic gets used, I'll credit you as hard as I humanly can. Feel free to PM me if interested, and again, thank you!
  6. <blockquote data-ipsquote="" class="ipsQuote" data-ipsquote-username="Koholos" data-cite="Koholos" data-ipsquote-contentapp="forums" data-ipsquote-contenttype="forums" data-ipsquote-contentid="41193" data-ipsquote-contentclass="forums_Topic"><div>I feel like I reply to this thread too frequently, but I'm doing it again anyway.<p> </p><p> If you have Kevin Nash, and a guy with the last name of Hall, the stable name is obvious - they're The Outsiders.</p><p> </p><p> As far as Owens and Rhodes goes, being indie guys who came into the WWE gives them motivation and a way to debut - they're pissed that they had to make their names before WWE would even look at them. Sort of like the CM Punk storyline, but rather than trying to "change" WWE, they just want to dismantle it, so that indie feds have a better chance to grow.</p><p> </p><p> So, it could debut by beating up some of the WWE 'loyalists' - John Cena, Undertaker, and other guys who have basically come up though WWE feeder leagues.</p></div></blockquote><p> </p><p> If you call them the "New Outsiders", you can sell t-shirts where the stable's name is written as the "NeW Outsiders". For that extra little touch of a reference that everyone will make anyway <img alt=":D" data-src="//content.invisioncic.com/g322608/emoticons/biggrin.png.929299b4c121f473b0026f3d6e74d189.png" src="<___base_url___>/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" /></p>
  7. <blockquote data-ipsquote="" class="ipsQuote" data-ipsquote-username="BigINMoldova" data-cite="BigINMoldova" data-ipsquote-contentapp="forums" data-ipsquote-contenttype="forums" data-ipsquote-contentid="41193" data-ipsquote-contentclass="forums_Topic"><div>Should I just fire The Outsiders from '98 WCW? I've brought in the Dudleyz as replacements and I honestly prefer them to The Outsiders IRL but I'm not sure if canning The Outsiders is logical or not at this point. They've already run Piper out of the company and I'm scared they might do the same to Flair , The Giant or someone else important if I don't get rid of them sooner or later.<p> </p><p> Plush Nash refuses to job since he has creative control. I just don't see the appeal in keeping them around.</p></div></blockquote><p> </p><p> Well, they are definitely acting like the real 1998 Outsiders, that's for sure.</p><p> </p><p> From a historical perspective, I think WCW losing both of the Outsiders would have been a giant publicity coup for WWF. After all, they started the nWo angle and it was their defection that really set off the Monday Night Wars. Heck, even getting Syxx/X-Pac back from WCW (which was actually a power move against Nash and Hall, to fire their little buddy since Bischoff wasn't going to/couldn't fire them) was something WWF threw into WCW's face. Getting Nash and Hall back at that time...I think that would be like Austin jumping back to WCW at the height of the Monday Night War. Not as big as Austin, but somewhere on that level.</p><p> </p><p> FWIW, Nash seemed pretty lazy IRL and he <em>was</em> the person who booked an entire hour of <em>Nitro</em> without any wrestling. What's his promo skills + pop like? It would be entirely like Nash to not actually, you know, wrestle, but you could still potentially use him to help you get some huge angle ratings - which, if WCW's product settings are more pop than performance, will help your overall show score. You can do what happened in real life and have Nash go out and chew up a bunch of time talking or in video packages, to get the proportion of angles to matches higher, which will help a popularity-based company.</p><p> </p><p> Hall is similar, though if they've modded in his addiction issues, he's a bigger liability. I assume the mod has him as a better in-ring performer than Nash, but if WCW is pop over performance, that probably makes him less valuable than Nash. WCW kept him off TV in (failed) rehab so you could give him time off and eat the salary cost. And frankly, if you're going to fire one of the two Outsiders, Hall's probably the one you want to let go of given his drug and alcohol issues - you can let him go and give the WWF's reputation a black eye if he signs back up with the WWF.</p>
  8. Scheduling and Its Effects on Attendance/Ratings/Buy Rates I've not seen anything about this in the in-game help, or in this thread. It's possible I missed it, so if I did, pointing me towards the answers would be appreciated! In terms of holding events, showing TV, booking PPV, does day of the week matter? What I mean is, there are some slots that, in the real world, are considered prime television time (Monday nights; traditionally, Saturday nights, particularly for Georgia Championship/pre-Nitro WCW). PPVs are almost always held on Sunday nights. I think there could be an expectation that a live event on a Friday might have more people able to attend since they don't have work the next day than, say, a Wednesday. Does TEW 2016 take day of the week into account when determining attendance at live events, ratings for TV, and buy rates for PPVs? Do we have any ideas on what days of the week are better or worse? Also, does running a TV or an event at the same time as another promotion hurt one or both promotions? Or even provide a boost (as the Monday Night War boosted the size of the wrestling audience instead of splitting a finite number of viewers)? Thank you all in advance!
  9. <blockquote data-ipsquote="" class="ipsQuote" data-ipsquote-username="Tazzerman" data-cite="Tazzerman" data-ipsquote-contentapp="forums" data-ipsquote-contenttype="forums" data-ipsquote-contentid="41263" data-ipsquote-contentclass="forums_Topic"><div>I am trying to pair up Tye Dillinger and Dolph Ziggler, any ideas on a good name for them?</div></blockquote><p> </p><p> The Perfect Showoffs?</p>
  10. <blockquote data-ipsquote="" class="ipsQuote" data-ipsquote-username="Koholos" data-cite="Koholos" data-ipsquote-contentapp="forums" data-ipsquote-contenttype="forums" data-ipsquote-contentid="41193" data-ipsquote-contentclass="forums_Topic"><div>This is more of a "booking theory" question, I guess, but as a wrestling neophyte, I'm curious about when it would be natural in a feud to use some of the more 'exotic' match types? (In my case, primarily in TCW/SWF).<p> </p><p> Like, I know ladder matches tend to be done when 2 or more 'equals' are fighting for some prize. And Cage matches are theorectically to prevent 'interference'. </p><p> </p><p> But, outside of lucha, when would you use a 2 out of 3 falls match? Or a Cell match as opposed to a Cage match? And things like First Blood vs I Quit vs Last Man Standing? </p><p> </p><p> I feel like I tend to rely too much on basic matches, when I probably should be ramping up some of my storylines, so I'm hoping that having a better understanding may help open my toolbox a bit.</p></div></blockquote><p> </p><p> I mean, there's a lot of different theories about this. The most "traditional" American take on these matches are that they are used as the big "blow-off" to a feud. Basically, when two guys (or teams, or factions) have been going to war for a while, these special stipulation matches are considered the ultimate way of ending the war once and for all. The special stipulations raise the stakes and usually the danger of the match, which serves as the storyline's climatic point.</p><p> </p><p> Generally, First Blood matches are good for when a feud has been violent and the idea is that both competitor's don't want to just beat their opponent, they want to maim them and do serious, lasting injury. Last Man Standing and I Quit matches have an element of "who's tougher" - in both cases, it's not enjoy to just score a quick pinfall, and these tend to be physically grueling matches. They're good for when things are so hot between two workers that it's again not just enough to win a victory over the rival, but to show without a doubt that they are the tougher person.</p><p> </p><p> 2 out of 3 falls matches are actually how American wrestling championship matches in the early territory days were settled. The idea being, the championship wouldn't change on a "fluke", as having to win twice showed that you truly were the better competitor. In general, a 2 out of 3 falls match can still serve the same purpose - when you want to book in such a way that there is an undisputed victor. The recent Revival vs. DIY 2 out of 3 falls match at NXT Takeover: Toronto is a good example of booking toward that goal.</p><p> </p><p> That said, that's a fairly traditional view of booking. The idea is that you use these special stipulation matches sparingly, because you want them to serve as the important climaxes to big feuds - which means audiences come to see these matches as "special" and thus will buy tickets/PPVs because they're about to see a real "treat". Do them too often, and they lose their novelty, and thus lose their drawing power.</p><p> </p><p> Obviously, different points of view abound. ECW, in many ways, operated under constant "Street Fight" rules, whereas in 1981 Pat Patterson and Sgt. Slaughter met in a "Bootcamp" match that was essentially a "Street Fight" which was considered a bloody, violent spectacle because those matches didn't happen in 1981 WWF. Some promotions regularly put on Death Match matches as part of their calling card - you can rest assured you'll get blood as part of your ticket price. And the Attitude Era WWF and Vince Russo WCW products saw quite a few "gimmick" matches occurring as part of the general over-the-top, overbooked style of the time.</p><p> </p><p> So in some ways, it's a matter of taste how you want to use special stipulation matches. There are people with <em>nuclear</em> heated opinions about what the "correct" way to book special stipulations matches is, so I don't know if there's one right and true way of using them.</p>
  11. <blockquote data-ipsquote="" class="ipsQuote" data-ipsquote-username="Rickymex" data-cite="Rickymex" data-ipsquote-contentapp="forums" data-ipsquote-contenttype="forums" data-ipsquote-contentid="41193" data-ipsquote-contentclass="forums_Topic"><div>Created a TEW promotion in th Great Lakes area and I'm planning on having a tournament but having trouble coming up with a name. I'm thinking Chicago so something maybe the Windy City Summit. Anyone have any suggestions?</div></blockquote><p> </p><p> Unless you think it encroaches into Punk's gimmick, with Chicago being "The Second City", you could go with "Second City Summit" or "Second City Slam", if you're into alliterative event naming.</p>
  12. <blockquote data-ipsquote="" class="ipsQuote" data-ipsquote-username="AaronStrickland" data-cite="AaronStrickland" data-ipsquote-contentapp="forums" data-ipsquote-contenttype="forums" data-ipsquote-contentid="41193" data-ipsquote-contentclass="forums_Topic"><div>I also need a general manager figure for 205 live, ideally someone who was featured heavily in the Cruiserweight division. Was leaning towards Mysterio but I just couldn't imagine it.</div></blockquote><p> </p><p> What's Dean Malenko doing these days? Jericho's still active, Rey-Rey is too(kind of, if his knees don't explode), Eddie and Benoit are both dead, and many of the remaining cruiserweights were either Mexican or Japanese stars or lesser names. Dean Malenko also has the benefit of being a strong presence with a solid cruiserweight background, but not such a big personality or name that he would wind up overshadowing the action. I think he'd slot in very nicely in the William Regal-like slot of a 205 show.</p>
  13. <blockquote data-ipsquote="" class="ipsQuote" data-ipsquote-username="Poputt" data-cite="Poputt" data-ipsquote-contentapp="forums" data-ipsquote-contenttype="forums" data-ipsquote-contentid="41193" data-ipsquote-contentclass="forums_Topic"><div>Don't have Zayn cash in. All of his wins should be 100% legit and clean.<p> </p><p> And don't have him tag, give him a manager instead. Have him come out to make some saves on TV, too. Other than that your plans are pretty solid.</p></div></blockquote><p> </p><p> If you do want to have him hold the briefcase, you could have him announce ahead of time that's he's going to cash in - I think Cena did that once? That would make Sami stand out in terms of cashing in the brief case - he's honorable enough that he'll give his opponent time to prepare. Him winning anyway, even with giving his opponent warning, strikes me as really putting him over as an upstanding, do-gooder face champion.</p>
  14. <blockquote data-ipsquote="" class="ipsQuote" data-ipsquote-username="wearsupereggs12" data-cite="wearsupereggs12" data-ipsquote-contentapp="forums" data-ipsquote-contenttype="forums" data-ipsquote-contentid="41194" data-ipsquote-contentclass="forums_Topic"><div>i am running wcw in 1997, hired guy with 40 pop. i had him 6 minutes domination match at nitro and his pop is dropper to 39. why?<p> (sorry for bad english)</p></div></blockquote><p> </p><p> Also, if the dominating worker has poor charisma, the dominating worker can actually lose popularity.</p>
  15. <blockquote data-ipsquote="" class="ipsQuote" data-ipsquote-username="HollywoodRx" data-cite="HollywoodRx" data-ipsquote-contentapp="forums" data-ipsquote-contenttype="forums" data-ipsquote-contentid="41194" data-ipsquote-contentclass="forums_Topic"><div>Hi, small question. Can a worker can use 2 alter egos at the same time, one being face, the other being heel ?<p> </p><p> I do a "what if" game, with Magnum TA back from his injuries in WCW in 1991, I want him to feud with a masked heel Mr. Wrestling 3. Behind the mask, it will be Dustin Rhodes. I want to push Dustin Rhodes as a face, while he his a heel behind the mask, for a big unmasking at Starrcade.</p></div></blockquote><p> </p><p> Get all Black Scorpion about things and just hire someone else to be Mr. Wrestling 3 until it's time for the big reveal, where all you have to do is just have Dustin unmask as "Mr. Wrestling 3" even though someone else has been under the hood the whole time.</p><p> </p><p> It's certainly not the most ridiculous thing that's been done in pro wrestling...</p>
  16. Building off this, you could go with Sandler having run his mouth starting the bar fight in the first place, Shawn Michaels to a group of Marines style, but Shamrock just saw one small guy vs. a group of huge dudes and saved him. You can keep with that dynamic - Sandler runs his mouth to various wrestlers, and the runs and hides behind Shamrock when he's got the other guy mad enough to want to punch him out. If you ever wanted to break them up, you could have Shamrock finally get tired of cleaning up Sandler's messes, and just tell someone coming to beat Sandler up that "he's all yours" then walk off as Sandler FINALLY gets what's coming to him.
  17. <blockquote data-ipsquote="" class="ipsQuote" data-ipsquote-username="HughBristic" data-cite="HughBristic" data-ipsquote-contentapp="forums" data-ipsquote-contenttype="forums" data-ipsquote-contentid="41194" data-ipsquote-contentclass="forums_Topic"><div>I have broadcasters that wont negotiate with me even though I meet all the requirements. It will say pass for every requirement till I get to Popularity where it says I fail, but for example, a station requires C in 4 regions of Canada, when I am C in all the regions, but it still says I fail.<p> </p><p> I cant seem to find an answer to this anywhere?</p></div></blockquote><p> </p><p> Have you checked what production values the broadcaster requires, and are you meeting them? That may be the problem if you're meeting all the popularity requirements.</p>
  18. <blockquote data-ipsquote="" class="ipsQuote" data-ipsquote-username="shawn michaels 82" data-cite="shawn michaels 82" data-ipsquote-contentapp="forums" data-ipsquote-contenttype="forums" data-ipsquote-contentid="41263" data-ipsquote-contentclass="forums_Topic"><div>I will have to import Arnold, since he's not in this DB, but it's totally worth it. Now he needs a partner. <img alt=":D" data-src="//content.invisioncic.com/g322608/emoticons/biggrin.png.929299b4c121f473b0026f3d6e74d189.png" src="<___base_url___>/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" /></div></blockquote><p> </p><p> What's Jean-Claude Van Damme and/or Dolph Lundgren up to? <img alt=":cool:" data-src="//content.invisioncic.com/g322608/emoticons/cool.png.f00d2562b2c1d873a09323753efdb041.png" src="<___base_url___>/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" /></p>
  19. <blockquote data-ipsquote="" class="ipsQuote" data-ipsquote-username="shawn michaels 82" data-cite="shawn michaels 82" data-ipsquote-contentapp="forums" data-ipsquote-contenttype="forums" data-ipsquote-contentid="41263" data-ipsquote-contentclass="forums_Topic"><div>Thanks for all the ideas, guys. Helped me think. What you guys think about "Last Action Heroes?"</div></blockquote><p> </p><p> If you can hire Arnold (Ah-nold) and get him feuding with Chuck & Sly over them taking the name when it was his movie's title, I'd do it in a heartbeat <img alt=":D" data-src="//content.invisioncic.com/g322608/emoticons/biggrin.png.929299b4c121f473b0026f3d6e74d189.png" src="<___base_url___>/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" /></p>
  20. <blockquote data-ipsquote="" class="ipsQuote" data-ipsquote-username="jordanmason17" data-cite="jordanmason17" data-ipsquote-contentapp="forums" data-ipsquote-contenttype="forums" data-ipsquote-contentid="41193" data-ipsquote-contentclass="forums_Topic"><div>I hope this is the right place to put this so re-direct me if I'm in the wrong place <img alt=":)" data-src="//content.invisioncic.com/g322608/emoticons/smile.png.142cfa0a1cd2925c0463c1d00f499df2.png" src="<___base_url___>/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" /><p> </p><p> I recently had Jeff Jarrett defeat Ric Flair in a hair vs. hair match and now Flair will be taking 6 months off from AWA TV to allow me to focus on other things so he should return in early 1995.</p><p> </p><p> Upon his return he will be announcing that he has decided to reform the four horsemen without Arn & Tully and in a surprise twist, Jeff Jarrett will be announced as one of the newest members of the four horsemen. So the question is: Who should the other two people of the four horsemen be? If you need to know my roster so you can have a better idea then feel free to ask or just throw names out there but bare in mind some names you say may of already been snatched up by WWF.</p><p> </p><p> So far for the other two members I'm considering the team 'The Men Of 2001 Holds" Which is Chris Jericho and Dean Malenko. </p><p> </p><p> Thank you in-advance <img alt=":)" data-src="//content.invisioncic.com/g322608/emoticons/smile.png.142cfa0a1cd2925c0463c1d00f499df2.png" src="<___base_url___>/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" /></p></div></blockquote><p> </p><p> Jarrett was kind-of sort-of in the Horsemen for a period, sort of an "associate" or a "hanger-on" if you'd want to be less nice about it. I think him and Mongo got into a feud before Jarrett gained membership? Hard to remember with the mess that was late-era Horsemen.</p><p> </p><p> The Horsemen in the 90s did have Chris Benoit in their ranks; if he's not been plucked up by the WWF, you could have history repeat itself and have him as a third member. Additionally, you could potentially slot in Eddie Guerrero if he's still available. You'd have the crafty main eventer in Ric Flair, you'd have the US Title-level Jeff Jarrett, and you could team Benoit & Guerrero if you really want to have a similar vibe as the classic Horsemen, or have the Horsemen branch out and have Benoit grab the TV Title while Guerrero takes the Cruiserweight belt, if you want to really push the idea of the Horsemen being an unstoppable faction.</p>
  21. <blockquote data-ipsquote="" class="ipsQuote" data-ipsquote-username="Motor" data-cite="Motor" data-ipsquote-contentapp="forums" data-ipsquote-contenttype="forums" data-ipsquote-contentid="41263" data-ipsquote-contentclass="forums_Topic"><div>Terry Gordy Memorial Tag Team Classic/Cup<p> </p><p> He died in 2001, was a well-liked wrestler and he won several tag team championships, tournaments and tag team of the year awards. He was also a member of one of the most popular teams in the history of wrestling.</p></div></blockquote><p> </p><p> I suggested Arn, and I still like Arn as a suggestion, but this is an absolutely brilliant idea, and Gordy would definitely be worthy of such an honor.</p>
  22. If you're thinking real world, you could book Chikara, perhaps. Or something similar to its presentation.
  23. <blockquote data-ipsquote="" class="ipsQuote" data-ipsquote-username="TheJG" data-cite="TheJG" data-ipsquote-contentapp="forums" data-ipsquote-contenttype="forums" data-ipsquote-contentid="41263" data-ipsquote-contentclass="forums_Topic"><div>Any ideas for a name for an annual tag team tournament for WCW in 2003?<p> </p><p> The only historic one they've used is the Jim Crockett Sr. Memorial Cup Tag Team Tournament, which is far too long and far too outdated.</p><p> </p><p> Thanks.</p></div></blockquote><p> </p><p> Unless he's working for the 'E backstage, maybe the "Arn Anderson Tag Team Tournament"? Or "Arn Anderson Tag Challenge Series"?</p><p> </p><p> Given Arn's position in the Four Horsemen was half of a tag team with Ole - and since Ole burnt a lot of bridges, you'd probably not see a "Minnesota Wrecking Crew Tag Team Tournament" - and that Arn was forced to retire due to neck damage that could have paralyzed him, it might make sense for WCW to honor its history with a legend in 2003 whose active career the fans would still remember, but who was never getting in the ring again due to health concerns.</p><p> </p><p> If you wanted a full tag team, you could go with something involving the Rock 'n Roll Express, though they had a lot of work outside of the JCP Carolina territory and the Georgia Championship Wrestling territory - so you'd be honoring them more for their work all across the various southern territories than for their work in the promotions that were the WCW forerunners.</p><p> </p><p> Harlem Heat won the most WCW Tag Team Championships, but Booker T and Stevie Ray were still active in 2003 so naming it in honor of Harlem Heat probably wouldn't make a ton of sense.</p>
  24. <p>I'm going to second Koholos, because telling someone with the screen name "Hard Times" to go with a Dusty Rhodes angle is pretty much perfection.</p><p> </p><p> It's also possible you just go Janetty with Randy, if you think he's got less upside. Keep him around as a gatekeeper or jobber to the stars until you're ready to do the reunion angle and get the boys back together.</p>
  25. I dunno if it's the best way, but if I have a manager who can talk or who has high sex appeal, I use them in angles.
×
×
  • Create New...