j-llo Posted July 9, 2007 Share Posted July 9, 2007 Is it possible to assign a Title to a certain wrestler without having to win the title during a dynasty? Like when Vince McMahon gave Mick Foley the Hardcore Title. Is there anyway to 'award' a wrestler with a title? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shipshirt Posted July 9, 2007 Share Posted July 9, 2007 I think, when you create a title in the database, you can assign the first champion. Then you can import it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
j-llo Posted July 9, 2007 Author Share Posted July 9, 2007 [QUOTE=shipshirt;257504]I think, when you create a title in the database, you can assign the first champion. Then you can import it.[/QUOTE] How wud that b done? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SadisticBlessings Posted July 9, 2007 Share Posted July 9, 2007 [QUOTE=shipshirt;257504]I think, when you create a title in the database, you can assign the first champion. Then you can import it.[/QUOTE] I'm not at home right now, and therefore can't double check TEW to make certain, but I don't think this will work. Importing titles in and of itself may be possible, it's not something I've tried - but generally speaking things like assigning champions or title histories, relationships... essentially anything that effects the "connectivity" of the data is left out when importing. In EWR, there was an "Authority Awards Title" angle, and I seem to remember that feature being requested a couple times already... but as far as I know there is no way to award someone a newly created title without having them have a match for it first. But it's not necessarily impossible to work around - for instance, when Foley was awarded the Hardcore Title, he then went on to defend it later that night. To reflect this in TEW, I'd just have that match be for the title. But if that plan doesn't work for your dynasty, I'm not entirely sure it's something that can be fixed. Of course, since I'm not actually [I]playing[/I] TEW right now, this is essentially all conjecture based on my experiences and could be totally incorrect. So consider yourself warned! :D Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
j-llo Posted July 9, 2007 Author Share Posted July 9, 2007 Cheers Sadistic... I fink there'll b a way I can work around it! Any1 no whats the maximum amount of titles that can b defended in one match!? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SadisticBlessings Posted July 9, 2007 Share Posted July 9, 2007 [QUOTE=j-llo;257512]Cheers Sadistic... I fink there'll b a way I can work around it! Any1 no whats the maximum amount of titles that can b defended in one match!?[/QUOTE] That would be two. So, unification matches - yes. Triple Crown unification matches - sadly, no. :( Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D-Lyrium Posted July 9, 2007 Share Posted July 9, 2007 It's a bit of a lame workaround, but you could always have the worker win the title during a dark match, and 'pretend' to be awarded it during the angle. Unfortunately, due to the new way the angles work, you can't award titles in angles anymore. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
j-llo Posted July 9, 2007 Author Share Posted July 9, 2007 [QUOTE=SadisticBlessings;257515]That would be two. So, unification matches - yes. Triple Crown unification matches - sadly, no. :([/QUOTE] Damn! That puts the J-Crown out of question then!!! [QUOTE]It's a bit of a lame workaround, but you could always have the worker win the title during a dark match, and 'pretend' to be awarded it during the angle. Unfortunately, due to the new way the angles work, you can't award titles in angles anymore.[/QUOTE] Yep the dark match cud always b a posibility! Might try that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Ransik Posted July 9, 2007 Share Posted July 9, 2007 The one time I did that, I just used the first defense to give the guy the Title. I wrote in the diary that he won it, but according to the game he won it on what I wrote as his first defense... can't remember who, what or when... but I remember doing it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Capelli King Posted July 9, 2007 Share Posted July 9, 2007 I think no. Actually 100% not! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
badlefthook Posted July 9, 2007 Share Posted July 9, 2007 [QUOTE=Ransik;257553]The one time I did that, I just used the first defense to give the guy the Title. I wrote in the diary that he won it, but according to the game he won it on what I wrote as his first defense... can't remember who, what or when... but I remember doing it.[/QUOTE] That is exactly how I have done it in the past. Or if you are doing a thing with a heel being awarded a title by a heel authority figure...I like to do it in a fun way. i.e. Have the authority figure announce a new title and that he will have worker a (his "guy"...say..bret hart) wrestle wrestler b (say...el dandy) to crown the first winner. The whole idea of an authority figure pitting a main eventer against a guy with no chance to make the new title be "legit" is fun to me. And besides...who are you to doubt el dandy? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
woodyjw83 Posted July 9, 2007 Share Posted July 9, 2007 Not sure if you can do this all the time but I had AJ Styles and C.Daniels as my tag champs winning the triple threat tag match on TNA. They were supposed to go to Victory Road. Well the next day Daniels signs with WWE. So I was able to have Christian and Styles defend the belt. Not sure if this only worked cuz I had Styles in the match. I wrote in my diary that Daniels was attacked by Christians Coalition. Tomko threw him off a loading dock and he's out indefinetly. Could try putting your guy in a match and just put the belt on the line whether champ is in match or not. Thats unless you have no champ. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.