gbasalmon Posted August 11, 2008 Share Posted August 11, 2008 Do we know for sure what all of the different interviews with wrestlers mean? I've seen some of the ramifications alluded to, but nothing hard and fast... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hyde Hill Posted August 12, 2008 Share Posted August 12, 2008 Well for sure is kind of a hard term in this world as the only one who knows anything For Sure is Adam. And it would take away the mystique. Most interviews mean exactly what they mean.IMHO this is what the less obvious mean. Likes opening, closing,middle of the show-> better performance when slotted int hat piece of the match day. Nervous when pushed -> performes less good higher up the card. Likes/Dislikes working against certain type/size -> better or worse performance against that type/style, usually acompanied by a nonsensical lack of psychology/flow note. One to watch-> high destiny and or potential. Best .... today -> best at this moment, says nothing about destiny or potential just highlights a good worker. Negative positive comments-> bad or good relation forming. Backstage politics-> means he is a bad influence backstage. Nervous, likes debute -> less good or better then normal debut performance. The rest are pretty self explanatory like deaths, drugs, firings, hirings etc if I missed any post and wil give my thoughts- Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gbasalmon Posted August 12, 2008 Author Share Posted August 12, 2008 The ones that I was interested in are the opening/closing, nervous, bigger/smaller opponents ones. I was wondering if anybody had experienced any tangible changes due to the interviews/messages. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marcel Fromage Posted August 12, 2008 Share Posted August 12, 2008 Hmm. I'd be interested in this as well. I've always viewed them simply as fluff, to be honest, with the possible exception of the ones which suggest they've a high destiny. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phantom Stranger Posted August 12, 2008 Share Posted August 12, 2008 [QUOTE=gbasalmon;477928]The ones that I was interested in are the opening/closing, nervous, bigger/smaller opponents ones. I was wondering if anybody had experienced any tangible changes due to the interviews/messages.[/QUOTE] Some folks have observed problems putting someone against smaller opponents when he hates it. I've observed absolutely zero difference.I'd guess therefore that if there is an issue it's a fairly negligible adjustment. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hyde Hill Posted August 12, 2008 Share Posted August 12, 2008 [QUOTE]I've observed absolutely zero difference.I'd guess therefore that if there is an issue it's a fairly negligible adjustment.[/QUOTE] depends on how big the problem is altough you can't garner that from radio interviews. But vs bigger or smaller will get higher or lower match grades and if its a big problem lack of psychology notes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phantom Stranger Posted August 13, 2008 Share Posted August 13, 2008 [QUOTE=Hyde Hill;478281]depends on how big the problem is altough you can't garner that from radio interviews. But vs bigger or smaller will get higher or lower match grades and if its a big problem lack of psychology notes.[/QUOTE] Like I say, I've yet to see any definitive difference. Any given match can fluctuate a grade or two as it is. I'm leaving confirmation that this happens personally til I see it happen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.