TrekkieMonsta Posted June 13, 2010 Share Posted June 13, 2010 The whole Danielson makes me a bit annoyed, but if he did get himself fired due to doing something violent on TV, it's sadly his own fault Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wilts Posted June 13, 2010 Share Posted June 13, 2010 Question; if Danielson was legit fired and he doesn't have a 90 day clause (they don't if fired do they) then if you were TNA how much money would you throw at him to get him at Slammiversary tonight? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-laz- Posted June 13, 2010 Share Posted June 13, 2010 Spoilers Highlight to view WWE has trademarked the term "The Network." this could be what the "N" on the nXt rookies armbands stands for Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Roguey Posted June 13, 2010 Share Posted June 13, 2010 Spoilers Highlight to view WWE has trademarked the term "The Network." this could be what the "N" on the nXt rookies armbands stands for Maybe Don Callis is the leader of NXT. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-laz- Posted June 13, 2010 Share Posted June 13, 2010 i think joey styles Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hyde Hill Posted June 13, 2010 Share Posted June 13, 2010 Or it is for the WWE Network The Network! You know that E channel they are exploring. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hyde Hill Posted June 13, 2010 Share Posted June 13, 2010 Question; if Danielson was legit fired and he doesn't have a 90 day clause (they don't if fired do they) then if you were TNA how much money would you throw at him to get him at Slammiversary tonight? Nope fired is also 90 days, see Anderson Anderson, Ken. Depends on the contract etc but generally is always 90 days. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wilts Posted June 13, 2010 Share Posted June 13, 2010 damn it. was hoping for TNA and Bryan to capitalize on this if it is a legit firing... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hyde Hill Posted June 13, 2010 Share Posted June 13, 2010 They will but in 3 months unless they have the balls to challenge that rule. But as it is a paid 90 days and are allowed to do non tv or ppv events no real reason to do it as a performer. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big Roguey Posted June 13, 2010 Share Posted June 13, 2010 They will but in 3 months unless they have the balls to challenge that rule. But as it is a paid 90 days no real reason to do it as a performer. I could see a bypass to the clause if TNA are smart. Here goes Have a mysterious character show up at Slammaversary. End of the show, said mystery person locks in say The Cattle Mutilation. Boom Danielson appears. TNA probably have the money to challenge the rule. WWE are feared in case some of their cast-offs will make it. However, almost everyone and their dead giraffe knows this thing reeks of work. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MightyDavidson Posted June 13, 2010 Share Posted June 13, 2010 That helps prove it IS a work. If he was "never a part of the company," why would they announce he is released? Because they actually fired him? As in: in kayfabe he's not part of the company so the announcement of his release couldn't possibly be kayfabe? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-laz- Posted June 13, 2010 Share Posted June 13, 2010 why cant tna debut a mysterious masked character known as american dragon Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hyde Hill Posted June 13, 2010 Share Posted June 13, 2010 Yep they could have Kiyoshi or someone else play it for a while, or bring back Suicide and have him unmask as Danielson lolz. I was with TNA all along!!!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MightyDavidson Posted June 13, 2010 Share Posted June 13, 2010 The whole Danielson makes me a bit annoyed, but if he did get himself fired due to doing something violent on TV, it's sadly his own fault No it's not, because he was told by his employer to do that violent thing on TV. Thus it's his employer's fault for telling him to do it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-laz- Posted June 13, 2010 Share Posted June 13, 2010 heres something very interesting iv found on the WWE Corperate website they havent got anything about Danielsons release but they do have carlitos, maby wwe are now using wwe.com as an extension of there tv shows and all real wwe news will be at there corperate website http://corporate.wwe.com/news/releases_2010.jsp Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MightyDavidson Posted June 13, 2010 Share Posted June 13, 2010 heres something very interesting iv found on the WWE Corperate website they havent got anything about Danielsons release but they do have carlitos, maby wwe are now using wwe.com as an extension of there tv shows and all real wwe news will be at there corperate website http://corporate.wwe.com/news/releases_2010.jsp Doesn't really mean anything, as they're only required to announce firings related to wellness issues. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-laz- Posted June 13, 2010 Share Posted June 13, 2010 heres an idea what if suicide returns tonight at slammiversery but is actually danielson wwe would have no way of proving its him due to it being a full body suit Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GDE71 Posted June 13, 2010 Share Posted June 13, 2010 I'm going to DVR Raw Monday. That way I don't waste two hours on this angle, I can just fast forward thru the show and only watch the angle. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-laz- Posted June 13, 2010 Share Posted June 13, 2010 found this Virtually no wrestlers, reporters or fans would be shocked if Bryan Danielson showed up on RAW this Monday, but as of press time, the going word is that his WWE release Friday was, in fact, legitimate. As was noted early Saturday morning on Prowrestling.com, the actual story going around is that Danielson was fired in response to the scene on Monday’s RAW in which he graphically choked out announcer Justin Roberts with his tie (a scene which was edited from later re-airings of the Invasion angle). While no one is doubting that there were other people responsible for the image–Roberts for making the cartoon-like face, the cameraman for capturing the action and the directors and producers that let the image hit the air–the word, according to F4WOnline.com, is that a very influential entity with a connection to WWE (believed to be a sponsor, affiliate or business partner) complained and that someone had to be the scapegoat. Similarly, there is not necessarily any rationale being given for why Danielson, specifically, got in trouble for a scene that hardly ranks as WWE’s most violent or offensive of all time–it simply came down to the reality that Danielson’s actions were the ones that angered someone in a position of power. There have been loose reports that Danielson broke a “no visual strangulation” rule that was put in place after the Chris Benoit tragedy, but it is not clear that the entity responsible for the complaint was actively thinking about Benoit at the time. Further, because this would not be the first time someone’s in-ring actions have created a connection to Benoit (Shawn Michaels, for instance, used the crippler crossface on television long after the assumed Benoit double-murder-suicide), it is not certain that the connection, alone, could get someone fired in 2010. There has been no indication that WWE officials are holding Danielson in serious contempt; F4WOnline.com sources, in fact, say he was given the impression that the door would be open for a return down the road once everything blows over. Both the WWE executive rank and independent wrestling promotions have, however, been told he will become a free agent once his non-compete expires, so it does not seem that, at least as of press time, WWE anticipates the “cooling off” period being a week or two. Of course, there still exists the small possibility that the release story is an elaborate work or that WWE will quickly rethink its decision and turn the release into a work. But if it is, it would mean that WWE is also working some of its most influential employees in the process, as multiple sources all maintain that some of WWE’s most senior individuals, in addition to the creative team, were assured he was gone. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LoganRodzen Posted June 13, 2010 Share Posted June 13, 2010 Well, I decided to sleep on the whole Danielson thing and come back with a different outlook. The more I think about it and the more I look at it from different angles... I'm starting to believe he truly was fired Friday. All this time I was thinking it couldn't be possible because Vinnie Mac had to approve what happened and he was said to be ecstatic about the angle. After seeing people talk about him getting fired "without a contract" since he didn't win NXT, the more I believe he actually was fired. He didn't win NXT so he wouldn't be under contract in the angle and therefore the release can't be part of the angle. It has to be because of Linda's campaign and someone outside of the WWE who complained big time. It's actually really disappointing now that I'm realizing the worst. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheEdgeOfReason Posted June 13, 2010 Share Posted June 13, 2010 So basically that was a big pile of nothing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-laz- Posted June 13, 2010 Share Posted June 13, 2010 i really dont think wwe writers have the intelligence to put this kinda thing together Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wilts Posted June 13, 2010 Share Posted June 13, 2010 And just think, this from a company that gave us Katie Vick, people being set on fire, someone being runover, and many more similar angles... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Linsolv Posted June 13, 2010 Share Posted June 13, 2010 I don't think they're unintelligent. I suspect they've been writing under pretty heavy restrictions due to the whole McMahon campaign. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-laz- Posted June 13, 2010 Share Posted June 13, 2010 how much money do you wanna bet that this wouldnt have happend if triple h, john cena or randy orton had choked that crappy anouncer Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.