Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I don't want to nitpick on an otherwise bang on point but, somehow, it appears that Sean Waltman made his way onto your list of wrestlers who were entertaining. Don't feel bad about it, it's happening now to TNA too. The edit button is a blue one in the bottom right hand side of your post if you want to remove him.

 

Oh and it might be a Prestige issue. Check your prestige and that of WCW's... they might have sneaked ahead of you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest goatc0re

The way this game works, with little-to-no popularity in the US, their asking price would only be a few hundred dollars a month for an exclusive contract, and they are most likely making a lot more in that in Mexico where they are famous. Personally I think they should at least negotiate with you to see what you will offer.

 

Oh, and Waltman was totally entertaining back then! A lot of the WWF roster did suck though but I fixed that at least in my game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's popularity disparity. They're more popular in their home territory (mexico from the sound of it) then in the United States.

 

If the worker would have to take a huge pay cut to work in a new area, some take it, some don't. If it really bothers you, bump up their popularity in the US or lower their popularity in Mexico and they should reconsider.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It says they THINK they can make more money elsewhere. What causes that thought?

 

 

oh and

 

 

So in 95, suddenly Bret, Owen, HBK, Waltman, Razor Ramon, Taker, Davey Boy Smith, and everyone wernt entertaining? Interesting

 

It means that they think they can make more money working in Mexico were they are more popular.

 

Also WWF was good in 95 and as for Waltmen was entertaining and still is his ring work isnt as good today as it was in 95 then he could work a pretty good match

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's popularity disparity. They're more popular in their home territory (mexico from the sound of it) then in the United States.

 

Huh. Good to know.

 

As for Waltman... well... these things are subjective. There's no right or wrong. Of course if there were to be a wrong in such things, thinking Sean Waltman is entertaining would be it. I don't know if you saw his epic rockpaperscissors battle at Genesis, but entertaining isn't the word I'd use for it. I think the compound word TNA asked their fans not to chant anymore would be more like it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...