Jump to content

Worker Basics, Psychology, Safety and Selling


Recommended Posts

Posted

Well I'm at the stage where I'm going to update all my workers from the TEW08 mod.. One thing I realized after reading TEW10's help file is that certain statistics, I was giving people far too low stats (namely, Consistency)

 

So like consistency, where the general idea is that an average worker should be about 85%, I'm wondering what the average stats should be for the other performance settings.

 

----

 

Basics I expect is something that can vary quite a bit, depending on experience, so what would be a general setting for an average new worker?

 

Psychology I tend to give people around the 40/50s, unless they're supposed to be particularly good or bad in that area for a reason.. is that too low or high?

 

Safety is one that I have been rating relative to their experience (meaning young guys tend to have pretty low ratings) in most cases, thinking that they need time to improve.. I am wondering if perhaps this is more a case of consistency, where people should be highly rated in general?

 

Selling, again, this is one that I have been doing in relation to experience. Is this right, or should it also be highly rated, unless someone particularly sucks?

Posted
Well I'm at the stage where I'm going to update all my workers from the TEW08 mod.. One thing I realized after reading TEW10's help file is that certain statistics, I was giving people far too low stats (namely, Consistency)

 

So like consistency, where the general idea is that an average worker should be about 85%, I'm wondering what the average stats should be for the other performance settings.

 

----

 

Basics I expect is something that can vary quite a bit, depending on experience, so what would be a general setting for an average new worker?

 

Psychology I tend to give people around the 40/50s, unless they're supposed to be particularly good or bad in that area for a reason.. is that too low or high?

 

Safety is one that I have been rating relative to their experience (meaning young guys tend to have pretty low ratings) in most cases, thinking that they need time to improve.. I am wondering if perhaps this is more a case of consistency, where people should be highly rated in general?

 

Selling, again, this is one that I have been doing in relation to experience. Is this right, or should it also be highly rated, unless someone particularly sucks?

 

I would say for basics it would be along the same lines as safety and selling. The longer you been around the more basics you would USUALLY have.

 

I think your psychology should be here though. Average psychology of a D is pretty poor.

Posted

Oi vey! I hadn't even thought about that thread for some strange reason (*hits self on head*)

 

Yeah looks like safety, basics, and selling are roughly about the same (I may need to be a bit more generous with them from now on).. consistency skews higher.. and psych skews lower (putting my defaulters about right).

 

Good show

Posted
In my view, basics is probably the best indicator of the quality of a trainer. The term 'fundamentally sound' often means something different in each sport it applies to. It's no different for wrestling. A well trained worker is going to have a firm grasp of the basics (which I would estimate as 60ish to start), be relatively safe (50s range in safety), and only really need experience to master the subtleties (psychology, selling) and learn to work to the same level of performance every match (consistency).
Posted
In my view, basics is probably the best indicator of the quality of a trainer. The term 'fundamentally sound' often means something different in each sport it applies to. It's no different for wrestling. A well trained worker is going to have a firm grasp of the basics (which I would estimate as 60ish to start), be relatively safe (50s range in safety), and only really need experience to master the subtleties (psychology, selling) and learn to work to the same level of performance every match (consistency).

 

If there's a handful of guys I can trust when it comes to stat setting advice, you're definitely one of them. So the advice is really appreciated

Posted
The stats thread is awesome, but anyone notice that despite the help file saying the average Consistency score should be 85%, that the actual average in the most balanced dataset in existence is only 70%, and that only 25% of workers are at 82% or above?

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...