Owner Goals or Own The Company?

[Gnrfan]

I have tried both ways with several different companies.

 

I find with Performance based companies that having owner goals makes for a better game but with Popularity based companies that the owner goals can make the game very restricted.

 

I just wondered what most people did?

[ash1983]

in TEW 08 I used to become the owner just because I couldnt sign certain people who were awesome and wouldve improved the promotion.

 

This time around I've got 2 games going incase I want to switch to have a change from booking sports entertainment or something and I'm using the owner goals on both as it does make the game more interesting and not as easy so it's a good challenge

[Lexa90]

You could always play Free Style too...

[NWO4until01]

for me it depends on the promotion and how it ties in with a realistic concept. In my game, I took over ownership of the TCW because with the financial problems they've had as a backdrop, its feasible that someone new could have purchased it from cornell. I'd be less inclined to takeover as owner with SWF as it doesnt fit the scene well.

[Candyman]

For me, neither. I don't think I've ever played as the owner of a company, aside from when I start my own promotion, and I rarely play with owner goals...although I do play as if I had the owner telling me what to do by pushing people they like, etc.

[Remianen]

I'm almost always owner (unless I'm testing for something). The goals I create for myself are, more often than not, far more challenging than the random owner goals and most of the time, they make more sense too.

[Terminator980]

I'm always the owner. Owner goals just sorta seem to turn me off to playing. Although that opinion could change if I ever try it. Who knows...

[Gigas]

You can toggle owner goals on and off in game now, so if I get any game breaking owner goals, I just turn em off.