the ismailite Posted February 6, 2006 Share Posted February 6, 2006 Depends on if a title changes hand due to a no contest. Some feds have different stips in regards to that. Some feds also have different stips in regards to no contests as well. I remember as a child watching Roddy Piper beat the crap out of Rick McGraw on a WWF show. He beat him so bad that the ref stopped the match citing that McGraw was unable to continue. Piper was given the win due to no contest even tho there actually was a contest (McGraw died within the next two weeks by the way). Would something like that merit a title change? I'd say so, but again different feds have different stips! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Villano 77 Posted February 6, 2006 Author Share Posted February 6, 2006 Yeah, I think on WWE in the recent past (Mid 90's-Present) a champion got knocked out but retained the championship. Anyway, that rule was used here. Maybe I'll write it into the storyline. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ultima Posted February 7, 2006 Share Posted February 7, 2006 I wasn't complaining, just curious. If Molly had been the one who hadn't won the title, THEN I'd be complaining ;) Good show Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.