TakerNGN74 Posted June 5, 2011 Share Posted June 5, 2011 Is annoying, In my MSWA game I have had him for a long time and every time his contract comes up he wants a title reign (Usually Midcard) and as a result has been both my Midcard and Main Event Champion multiple times. In fact every time his contract ususally comes up he is a champion already. It really annoys me when someone who is already a champion wants a title reign promise when negotiating a new contract. Anyone have this happen either with Ford Gumble or anyone else? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Inky The Squid Boy Posted June 5, 2011 Share Posted June 5, 2011 Don Henderson, Billy Robinson and Joey Beauchamp with ROF. Also Merle O'Curle but what Merle wants Merle gets. Just throw some more money at him, he'll soon realise that there's more to life than the glory of a midcard title reign Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TakerNGN74 Posted June 5, 2011 Author Share Posted June 5, 2011 Alright cool I will try and do that thanks for the quick reponse! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eidenhoek Posted June 5, 2011 Share Posted June 5, 2011 Try to have him not be champ when his contract comes up. His demands should lower. Similarly, the less popular he is, the cheaper he'll be. Then again, once a ****, always a ****. I guess his personality sucks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TakerNGN74 Posted June 5, 2011 Author Share Posted June 5, 2011 Every time he has wanted a title run I have him beat someone at one show and then lose it to the same guy he won it from on the last. There has been a few times that he hasn't been a champion when his contract came up but he still wanted a title run. My only hope at this point is that he retires soon, I am not sure although I doubt that will happen because he is only 47 right now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eidenhoek Posted June 5, 2011 Share Posted June 5, 2011 Every time he has wanted a title run I have him beat someone at one show and then lose it to the same guy he won it from on the last. There has been a few times that he hasn't been a champion when his contract came up but he still wanted a title run. My only hope at this point is that he retires soon, I am not sure although I doubt that will happen because he is only 47 right now. Make an angle with a high injury risk. Spam him in it. Also, overwork him every show and put him in matches with as high an injury risk as possible. Also, set the match danger/intensity to 100 for those matches. Put the matches in the pre- or post-show to not affect your show rating. Hopefully the wear-and-tear will cause him to retire. Then leech his overness. Note: I suggest hiring some poor slob psychopath to participate in the matches with him. Put these in the pre- and post-show. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ampulator Posted June 5, 2011 Share Posted June 5, 2011 TakerNGN74, you sure do seem to forget what good tactics. You give him the win when he wants, but it's up to YOU how you want him to win. He can win the in the worse ways possible, where he gets his butt kicked everytime, but somehow he wins. That will eventually destroys his momentum and popularity. A vet like you should know this. Let me help you set it up: Ford Gumble vs. Wrestler X Ford Gumble gets buried (but only if Ford Gumble doesn't complain about it in anyway whatsoever). Wrestler X dominates. Wrestler X is Kept strong. Wrestler X is Protected. Or Ford Gumble is the victor Ford Gumble gets buried (but only if Ford Gumble doesn't complain about it in anyway whatsoever). Wrestler X dominates. Wrestler X is Kept strong. Wrestler X is Protected. Cheap or Tainted Win The first has a rare but possible chance that the other wrestler might get booked the win, the other guarantees that Ford looks really bad even when he wins. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.