Companies in debt should prioritise running in profitable areas

[Bad Collin]

In my save 21CW are $12m in debt but keep running shows in places like Scotland and Wales where they can draw fewer fans (6k compared to 25k in London). In months that they run their big shows in London they make a profit. My suggestion is that when a company starts to get into debt they prioritise running in profitable areas until they are back to financial health.

Edited August 28 by Bad Collin

[TheDeep5ix]

That makes sense.

Likewise, a company in debt should prioritize getting rid of over-the-top production values that aren't necessary to their current broadcasters. 

[fourbrothers366]

Basically, maybe some changes to their behavior once they are negative. Also, other companies should be more aggressive in hostile takeover's of historic (either 7 years old or Small size) companies. A certain wrestling business owner bought his competition (WCW/ECW), not just let them go into bankruptcy and do nothing. 

[Bad Collin]

On 8/29/2024 at 3:12 AM, fourbrothers366 said:

Basically, maybe some changes to their behavior once they are negative. Also, other companies should be more aggressive in hostile takeover's of historic (either 7 years old or Small size) companies. A certain wrestling business owner bought his competition (WCW/ECW), not just let them go into bankruptcy and do nothing. 

Yeah, behaviour changes when going into debt would be great. If our owner can decide to work for free then surely Jeff Nova can decide to run show only in Southern England until they are back in the black.

I like the more aggresive AI purchasing idea too. In an ideal work owned broadcasting revenue would be affected by the number and quality of shows in the back catalogue and purchasing tape libraries would be a thing (like a certain former wrestling business owner).