Zero Posted Tuesday at 04:18 PM Share Posted Tuesday at 04:18 PM (edited) I would like for alliance members to vote for title changes. In another thread, someone brought up how often times "scrubs" will win alliance titles due to the fact it is based on popularity. I'm not sure how to rework this but it sucks watching a 10 overall no-name from anywhere but North America beat Harley Race for the NWA World Title. Maybe base it off OVERALL pop. Edited Tuesday at 04:19 PM by Zero 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fourbrothers366 Posted Tuesday at 04:45 PM Share Posted Tuesday at 04:45 PM (edited) Alliance members could also get a bonus POP for each game area that the alliance covers. So if the Alliance covers Canada, USA and Mexico, then maybe the company and workers get like +8% to 12% POP in outside game areas? Spillover? Just spitballing ideas. Edited Tuesday at 04:46 PM by fourbrothers366 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheDeep5ix Posted yesterday at 01:18 AM Share Posted yesterday at 01:18 AM This problem isn't just limited to alliance titles from what I've experienced. I've seen companies in alliances propose loans for my most popular wrestlers with 80+ popularity, only to job them to somebody with less than 20 popularity even though they lacked the 'Easy to Do Business' and other related attributes. They're supposed to have creative control when borrowed, so I'm stumped seeing why any popular wrestler in a big company would agree to do the job in a small-time show against a legit nobody if they don't have a pre-defined relationship, especially if the no-name has less than 2 years of experience. I think anybody loaned for an alliance should be inherently more selfish and just flat-out not lose to Unimportant people if they lack 'Easy to Do Business' and its related attributes when the AI controls them. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
frstbasmn13 Posted yesterday at 05:05 PM Share Posted yesterday at 05:05 PM 15 hours ago, TheDeep5ix said: This problem isn't just limited to alliance titles from what I've experienced. I've seen companies in alliances propose loans for my most popular wrestlers with 80+ popularity, only to job them to somebody with less than 20 popularity even though they lacked the 'Easy to Do Business' and other related attributes. They're supposed to have creative control when borrowed, so I'm stumped seeing why any popular wrestler in a big company would agree to do the job in a small-time show against a legit nobody if they don't have a pre-defined relationship, especially if the no-name has less than 2 years of experience. I think anybody loaned for an alliance should be inherently more selfish and just flat-out not lose to Unimportant people if they lack 'Easy to Do Business' and its related attributes when the AI controls them. A bit along the same lines but I wish when I have wrestlers in development I could have certain wrestlers be pushed more than others. I had someone who I built up after a big feud and I sent them down to development for some time away and they went from red hot to cold momentum bc they lost to lower overall wrestlers so I had to rebuild them up a bit. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.