GeoWar Posted September 16, 2004 Share Posted September 16, 2004 What are your thoughts???? . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GeoWar Posted September 16, 2004 Author Share Posted September 16, 2004 I choose -- Bowls with BCS. It is better than the polls because if you lose your final game it should be viewed no worse than lossing the 1st game of the season. In the polls it is ... you lose you drop. So when you lose is VERY important. . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Danny Posted September 16, 2004 Share Posted September 16, 2004 I vote E- All of the above Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest IrishHand Posted September 17, 2004 Share Posted September 17, 2004 A 16-team playoff is a ludicrous suggestion. They can't get them to agree on 1 extra game (for a 4-team playoff)...what makes you think they'd even consider 3 extra games?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maximus Posted September 19, 2004 Share Posted September 19, 2004 [QUOTE=Danny Drickman]I vote E- All of the above[/QUOTE] I could have sworn I posted in this thread already. Anyways, I agree with Danny here. I vote all of the above. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wranglers110 Posted September 22, 2004 Share Posted September 22, 2004 Any playoff system is better than the status quo, IMO. Heck, keep the status quo and mandate a championship game between the top two teams [i]after[/i] the traditional bowls have concluded. Anything but the status quo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GeoWar Posted September 24, 2004 Author Share Posted September 24, 2004 [B]Will people be happy with a playoff system, if we have a three (3) loss team win the National title over a one loss team ? Would it de-value the regular season ? . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HerdFan Posted September 25, 2004 Share Posted September 25, 2004 Teams are going to get screwed regardless of the system put in place. I'd rather they worked on cutting the conference affiliations in bowl games and dropping 3 or 4 of the really crappy bowls instead of going to a playoff. A bowl committee similar to the one the NCAA uses for college basketball seeding would be a great way to place teams in bowls. Also, if there were a playoff system put in place, any more than 4 teams is wrong. College football is the only sport that has such a major emphasis on the regular season and we get great football all season because of it. A 16 team playoff is a big step toward devalueing it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Danny Posted September 25, 2004 Share Posted September 25, 2004 [QUOTE=HerdFan]Teams are going to get screwed regardless of the system put in place. I'd rather they worked on cutting the conference affiliations in bowl games and dropping 3 or 4 of the really crappy bowls instead of going to a playoff. A bowl committee similar to the one the NCAA uses for college basketball seeding would be a great way to place teams in bowls. [/QUOTE] I disagree, with the exception of the championship bowls, the other bowls should be based conference affiliations. The rivalries that spur from that make it worthwhile. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.