Jump to content

BloodyKnuckles

Members
  • Posts

    290
  • Joined

BloodyKnuckles's Achievements

Newbie

Newbie (1/14)

10

Reputation

  1. I can see that comparison in a way, again like I said, I don't believe any wrestler can ever be replicated by another.. but if I'm comparing Punk to anyone, it's Steve Austin. Maybe it's just me, but I seem to always find them similar.. especially with Punk's recent anti-hero run.
  2. If I had to compare a current worker to Shawn Michaels, it'd have to be John Morrison. Both guys started out in tag teams, Morrison went on to bigger things while Mercury disappeared until the SES thing that lasted five days.. they are both also well rounded in the ring, but I'd say Morrison is more of a high flier whereas Michaels is more of a technician if that makes any sense. Still though, every wrestler as great as Michaels can ever be replicated. Their will never be another Shawn Michaels the same way their will never be another Rock or another Austin..
  3. I was more confused by you criticising some parts that you said you didn't even watch more than anything.. also, the RVD/Steiner match wasn't bad, both guys are older for sure but they can both still put on good matches. Again, since it's Impact they gave it like six minutes, but for me it wasn't skip worthy. Not trying to start an argument again, I just don't think people should bomb on things they didn't watch.. although I agree that Mexican America sucks, and the Knockouts stuff was too long.
  4. I thought it was a good match for the time they were given, that's my problem with Impact, everyone knows Shelley and Kendrick can put on a great match with each other.. but why cut some time away from the old guys and a ridiculously long Knockout brawl, just make the match 6 minutes and move on.. Never mind the fact that it was a title shot, I really feel like that was a missed opportunity for TNA to put on a really good title match on TV, but oh well, they'll still continue to ignore the crowd (loudest for X-Division segments) and spam knockouts and Hogan all over the show..
  5. You pretty much skipped the whole show, how can anyone take this opinion seriously? Other than Anarquia and the way too long Knockout segments, this was a pretty good show..
  6. But they did acknowledge him several times, just without doing it directly. Vince mentioned that he wasn't saying his name, Cena was supposed to be fired, the title tournament because he left, etc. etc. They are keeping it in the forefront, just without directly using or mentioning Punk by name. I'm actually surprised at how well it's gone so far..
  7. I think the point of it is that they aren't acknowledging it on Raw, it's kind of being played off as something completely outside of the WWE, which is pretty cool. Not saying it'd be better or worse if they did mention what he was doing on Raw, but I'm almost sure they won't.
  8. I agree one hundred percent that it was a five star match, for me Cena/Punk was as good as wrestling gets. The fact that it had an absolutely red hot crowd also didn't hurt..
  9. Alright show, with a pretty nice twist ending. Really curious to see where things go from here.
  10. New era talk is premature, but I hope it does mark a change towards a more entertaining product. I had a hard time even watching the 'E around 09-10. Also, no more spammed World Title runs!
  11. Sounds good, I just hope Punk shows up on Raw tonight! Imagine if he actually puts Punk's face on all the turnbuckles and such!
×
×
  • Create New...