Jump to content

benjybates

Members
  • Posts

    208
  • Joined

Posts posted by benjybates

  1. <blockquote data-ipsquote="" class="ipsQuote" data-ipsquote-username="Kingster" data-cite="Kingster" data-ipsquote-contentapp="forums" data-ipsquote-contenttype="forums" data-ipsquote-contentid="41194" data-ipsquote-contentclass="forums_Topic"><div>No, dark segments don't advance storylines in 2016.</div></blockquote><p> </p><p> Oh wow, I never realised, that means I can book say "Flair/Hogan" matches as post show matches that doesn't effect heat and has very minimal pop losses, right?</p>
  2. <blockquote data-ipsquote="" class="ipsQuote" data-ipsquote-username="sabataged" data-cite="sabataged" data-ipsquote-contentapp="forums" data-ipsquote-contenttype="forums" data-ipsquote-contentid="41194" data-ipsquote-contentclass="forums_Topic"><div>I dont have a real answer for you. But I have found that if I used Storytelling with my older veterans that I typically get better matches out of them. I am using SWF and I am about 3 years in. I use Storytelling for Jack Bruce matches all the time and they typically get higher ratings than without it.</div></blockquote><p> </p><p> Yeah I ALWAYS book Flair in storytelling matches cos they get better ratings, but i have no idea why at all</p>
  3. <blockquote data-ipsquote="" class="ipsQuote" data-ipsquote-username="Dr. Hook" data-cite="Dr. Hook" data-ipsquote-contentapp="forums" data-ipsquote-contenttype="forums" data-ipsquote-contentid="41194" data-ipsquote-contentclass="forums_Topic"><div>There is a possibility they could get busted and then your company gets hurt- not sure what the penalties are as it's never happened to me (I fire them straightaway <img alt=":D" data-src="//content.invisioncic.com/g322608/emoticons/biggrin.png.929299b4c121f473b0026f3d6e74d189.png" src="<___base_url___>/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" />)- but I imagine it could be pretty damaging.</div></blockquote><p> </p><p> I do absolutely nothing and have seemingly gotten away with it</p>
  4. <blockquote data-ipsquote="" class="ipsQuote" data-ipsquote-username="RatedRKO16" data-cite="RatedRKO16" data-ipsquote-contentapp="forums" data-ipsquote-contenttype="forums" data-ipsquote-contentid="41194" data-ipsquote-contentclass="forums_Topic"><div>What changes were made and when was this done?</div></blockquote><p> </p><p> I just meant with the fact that its now "Positive, Major Positive" etc</p><p> </p><p> I seems a lot easier now than a grade or numbered momentum system. Which i usually had ALL the workers I wanted to push in a big storyline called "[insert title] Division" or something so i could get them in the 90s-100</p><p> </p><p> But if it just goes from positive to major positive would they still have to be in successful angles to gain overness?</p><p> </p><p> ...I now don't know if I'm making sense</p>
  5. <blockquote data-ipsquote="" class="ipsQuote" data-ipsquote-username="mvargus" data-cite="mvargus" data-ipsquote-contentapp="forums" data-ipsquote-contenttype="forums" data-ipsquote-contentid="41194" data-ipsquote-contentclass="forums_Topic"><div>I just noticed you never received an answer. I don't run the performance feds often, so I am limited in what I can say, but in my experience they tend to be actually easier to book and to get workers over in as you just have to find workers with good skills and put them in good matches. It is entirely possible (although quite unlikely) to get two workers to put on a B+/A level match even when neither has B level overness in a performance fed if they are good enough wrestlers. Its not possible in a WWE type fed where popularity matters too much to allow the fans to give an A rating to such a matchup.</div></blockquote><p> </p><p> Oh! I guess the most challenging part is ingratiating myself into the Japanese wrestling scene then! Thank you!</p>
×
×
  • Create New...