flamebrain Posted July 15, 2007 Share Posted July 15, 2007 Warlord or Barbarian. Who carried the other in that team? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PeterHilton Posted July 15, 2007 Share Posted July 15, 2007 Barbarian. If you look at how their career went after they broke up, he was far more agile in the ring and even had some decent success with Meng in WCW. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Franchise22 Posted July 16, 2007 Share Posted July 16, 2007 barbarian for sure.... warlord was garbage. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
irabowman Posted July 16, 2007 Share Posted July 16, 2007 I will agree Barbarian. Warlord was just a huge stiff kinda like Lugar in my opion Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
still71 Posted July 16, 2007 Share Posted July 16, 2007 [B]Mr. Fuji[/B] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flamebrain Posted July 16, 2007 Author Share Posted July 16, 2007 [QUOTE=still71;261290][B]Mr. Fuji[/B][/QUOTE] Excellent point! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DocStevens Posted July 16, 2007 Share Posted July 16, 2007 I liked them both but I have to agree that Barbarian was probably the "better" of the two not that either of them had much talent beyond smashing things and screaming wildly...now that I think about it they sound like a 2008 WWE Main Eventer!! :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest The Aussie Posted July 17, 2007 Share Posted July 17, 2007 Barbarian was pretty good but this may be in comparsion with Warlord who was definetly pretty bad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.