Angle Riskiness

[jsadighi]

Want to make an angle where there are 2 workers who are about to sign a contract to face each other in a match. Predictably, one of them attacks the other.

 

However, during the segment the attacker signs the contract using the victim's blood.

 

What kind of riskiness rating should I give this angle? I'm using the Montreal 97 mod as WCW, and was wondering if TNT would allow this on Nitro (since they're notoriously low riskiness in the game mod)

[Teh_Showtime]

Id say low if not none

 

or it depends on what other blood angles in the batabase are

[Greg McNeish]

I'd make it Low. There's blood, so it's not a kiddie angle. That said, it's not exactly gruesome, or ultra-violent.

 

Heck, The Undertaker signed a contract using Steve Austin's blood, in 1998 or so. That wasn't even close to as risky as any of the crucifictions, or gun-related angles they did, and all of them were aired.

[King Kirby]

And Vince McMahon did this to Hogan sometime between 2003-2005, on Smackdown (free, mainstream TV, in primetime), well after the Attitude era was over and WWE was on the road to family-friendliness. Corpse fu@%ing, on the other hand, was reserved for cable.

[alden]

i am pretty sure i seen a few blood contract in the late 80's in mid south *i might be wrong about the company* so i would say fairly low risk if any.

[Hyde Hill]

Actually a lot of what was done in the MS in those times was quite risky. Heyman stole a lot from that area and time period as he freely admits. He just presented it better and or differently.