Lita Maivia Posted January 23, 2010 Share Posted January 23, 2010 So I have a question. Is chemistry backwards compatible when it comes to the managing feature? Like say I put Worker A Managing Worker B with Great chemistry. Does that mean Worker A has to be the manager while Worker B managing Worker A might be different? I know that sounds dumb, but I am just curious for clarification. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jaded Posted January 23, 2010 Share Posted January 23, 2010 So I have a question. Is chemistry backwards compatible when it comes to the managing feature? Like say I put Worker A Managing Worker B with Great chemistry. Does that mean Worker A has to be the manager while Worker B managing Worker A might be different? I know that sounds dumb, but I am just curious for clarification. 99% sure that in previous version it DIDN'T necessarily work both ways. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LoNdOn Posted January 23, 2010 Share Posted January 23, 2010 I would imagine that managing skills plays a greater role in this equation than merely the chemistry between the two workers. For example, yes they may have great chemistry together, but worker A may be much better at managing then worker B. So when the roles are reversed it effects the chemistry. Hope that made some sense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.