Hive Posted February 12, 2014 Share Posted February 12, 2014 <blockquote data-ipsquote="" class="ipsQuote" data-ipsquote-username="justtxyank" data-cite="justtxyank" data-ipsquote-contentapp="forums" data-ipsquote-contenttype="forums" data-ipsquote-contentid="35547" data-ipsquote-contentclass="forums_Topic"><div>94 is NOT boring!<p> </p><p> Well, I guess it is if you are a WWF guy. WCW is fun, even the wackiness, through 94, 95 and 96 before the nWo gets there and it gets obviously cool.</p></div></blockquote><p> </p><p> Yeah, well, I never tried to hide the fact that I'm a WCW guy first and foremost... so my mods all start at interesting dates for WCW.</p><p> </p><p> WWF 1994 is okay except for the fact that their tag team division is even worse than it is in 2014...</p><p> </p><p> </p><blockquote data-ipsquote="" class="ipsQuote" data-ipsquote-username="justtxyank" data-cite="justtxyank" data-ipsquote-contentapp="forums" data-ipsquote-contenttype="forums" data-ipsquote-contentid="35547" data-ipsquote-contentclass="forums_Topic"><div>The good news is I have a new image compression tool that makes the pack significantly smaller in data size. There are over 500 new files in the pack.</div></blockquote><p> </p><p> 500 new files? I can't wait!</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dawn Posted February 12, 2014 Share Posted February 12, 2014 Hive, if you could make a 1992 or a 2005 mod i would love you forever. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hive Posted February 12, 2014 Share Posted February 12, 2014 Hive, if you could make a 1992 or a 2005 mod i would love you forever. I consider 1992 and 1993 to be justtxyank's territory, I wouldn't dare do go there! While 2005 (or late 2004) does hold fond memories for me, as it was when I after many years of hiatus (and quickly follow by a fair deal years of hiatus again) returned to the world of wrestling and got sucked in by WWF/WWE for the first time - I just don't feel my data, with heavy focus on the 90's, would be a suitable match for this time period. I'd have to change way too many things, might as well start from scratch in that case... and that, I'm afraid I have no patience for. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Final Countdown Posted February 12, 2014 Share Posted February 12, 2014 I will go ahead and tell everyone in advance that you will probably need to download an entire new copy of nGo as opposed to an update pack on the next release. You say that like it's a bad thing. Enough new cuts to justify an entirely new pack is great if you ask me. nGo 4 Life! Hive, if you could make a 1992 or a 2005 mod i would love you forever. I can't speak for WCW, but '92 would actually be a great time to jump in and book the WWF. If it started in January, the WWF title would be vacant, which would open up some really interesting possibilities. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dawn Posted February 12, 2014 Share Posted February 12, 2014 I can't speak for WCW, but '92 would actually be a great time to jump in and book the WWF. If it started in January, the WWF title would be vacant, which would open up some really interesting possibilities. Yeah, it was one of the best WWF years on the Golden Era - and its start has really a huge breach for lots of paths. I'm glad Yank will make a 93 mod but if someone could make 92 i would love it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dawn Posted February 12, 2014 Share Posted February 12, 2014 I love the Attitude Era so much i've put that 92 is a year of it >_> Thank god i edited before someone saw it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
justtxyank Posted February 12, 2014 Author Share Posted February 12, 2014 It's almost a given that I will port Rising Storms forward to January 1992 and release that. There's no sense in me going to 93 and skipping 92. I'll likely do January 92 and January 93 as it's not all that difficult to move forward 1 year at a time in this time period. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RatedRKO16 Posted February 13, 2014 Share Posted February 13, 2014 I'm in agreement with whoever said someone needs to make a mod in mid 2000s. I think we have a WCW lives/dies alternate scenarios mod and that is it. It would be nice to have something a little after that. I was a big fan of the era after the Attitude Era as well...realism era or whatever they called it... something just before the switch would be awesome so the person can go the way of PG or stay in the Attitude Era forever. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hive Posted February 13, 2014 Share Posted February 13, 2014 It's almost a given that I will port Rising Storms forward to January 1992 and release that. There's no sense in me going to 93 and skipping 92. I'll likely do January 92 and January 93 Interesting. Any particular reason for doing 2 x January, or is it just because it will work better ingame wise (with awards and such)? as it's not all that difficult to move forward 1 year at a time in this time period. I don't know about that, a lot of stuff happens in 1 year... tag team experience/status, contracts, injuries, etc... I will say though that it's much easier going forward than backwards. I'm in agreement with whoever said someone needs to make a mod in mid 2000s. I think we have a WCW lives/dies alternate scenarios mod and that is it. It would be nice to have something a little after that. But... aren't you doing a 2004 diary? I assume that's based on some mod? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RatedRKO16 Posted February 13, 2014 Share Posted February 13, 2014 But... aren't you doing a 2004 diary? I assume that's based on some mod? Nope, must be someone else with a similar name or avatar. I'm terrible at diaries. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beejus Posted February 13, 2014 Share Posted February 13, 2014 January of 92 is a good spot, really; for the WWF, you have such a great roster, and the vacant title is a good jumping on point to go anywhere with it. For WCW, Luger is on the way out as champion with Sting as his contender, but with guys like Vader and the Dangerous Alliance on his heels. Honestly, the start of 93 really only gives you the very first Raw to work off of. Not a bad thing though, as it's a lot like doing September 95 for WCW. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hive Posted February 13, 2014 Share Posted February 13, 2014 Nope, must be someone else with a similar name or avatar. I'm terrible at diaries. Oh right, sorry. I'm thinking of RKOwnage. I assume I won't have to explain where I went wrong? Anyway, he's doing a 2004 diary - so I assume *someone* did mods in that timeframe. a lot like doing September 95 for WCW. http://forum.paradoxplaza.com/forum/images/smilies/ninja.gif Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Final Countdown Posted February 13, 2014 Share Posted February 13, 2014 But... aren't you doing a 2004 diary? I assume that's based on some mod? That's RKOwnage, and I think he said he's using a beta where the game world isn't fully fleshed out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mattywood Posted February 13, 2014 Share Posted February 13, 2014 It's almost a given that I will port Rising Storms forward to January 1992 and release that. There's no sense in me going to 93 and skipping 92. I'll likely do January 92 and January 93 as it's not all that difficult to move forward 1 year at a time in this time period. Love that you're doing those two time periods. So may different scenarios I've wanted to play with and never really had the chance to. I haven't gotten back to working on my improved version of the 1987 mod since I've gotten back to working on Risky Business. I'm thinking once I'm done with 1985 and 1987, I might do 1986. Does this make me the 80s guy for mod making? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
justtxyank Posted February 13, 2014 Author Share Posted February 13, 2014 Interesting. Any particular reason for doing 2 x January, or is it just because it will work better ingame wise (with awards and such)? Yeah it's mainly because it makes the game world smoother. Awards work better, etc. Also, I tend to get enjoyment out of running a full calendar year when I run a game so that's the way I see mods being built. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dawn Posted February 13, 2014 Share Posted February 13, 2014 The mid-2000s really need to be explored more in mods IMO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Idolized Posted February 13, 2014 Share Posted February 13, 2014 I have a 2004 mod in the late BETA stage you can find in the first page of this forum. There is also a 2003 BETA floating around though I'm not sure how complete it is. Same for a 2002 one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RatedRKO16 Posted February 13, 2014 Share Posted February 13, 2014 <blockquote data-ipsquote="" class="ipsQuote" data-ipsquote-username="Idolized" data-cite="Idolized" data-ipsquote-contentapp="forums" data-ipsquote-contenttype="forums" data-ipsquote-contentid="35547" data-ipsquote-contentclass="forums_Topic"><div>I have a 2004 mod in the late BETA stage you can find in the first page of this forum. There is also a 2003 BETA floating around though I'm not sure how complete it is. Same for a 2002 one.</div></blockquote><p> </p><p> Sweet deal! I'm always hesitant to start beta mods though... so whenever you get that baby more complete i'll be trying it <img alt=";)" data-src="//content.invisioncic.com/g322608/emoticons/wink.png.686f06e511ee1fbf6bdc7d82f6831e53.png" src="<___base_url___>/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" /></p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
justtxyank Posted February 14, 2014 Author Share Posted February 14, 2014 OK folks, almost there. Doing some new narratives and then running a few more tests and then she'll be released on you all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RatedRKO16 Posted February 14, 2014 Share Posted February 14, 2014 <blockquote data-ipsquote="" class="ipsQuote" data-ipsquote-username="justtxyank" data-cite="justtxyank" data-ipsquote-contentapp="forums" data-ipsquote-contenttype="forums" data-ipsquote-contentid="35547" data-ipsquote-contentclass="forums_Topic"><div>OK folks, almost there. Doing some new narratives and then running a few more tests and then she'll be released on you all.</div></blockquote><p> </p><p> <img alt=":D" data-src="//content.invisioncic.com/g322608/emoticons/biggrin.png.929299b4c121f473b0026f3d6e74d189.png" src="<___base_url___>/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" />:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D:D</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
justtxyank Posted February 14, 2014 Author Share Posted February 14, 2014 <p>Just FYI, and I hope this doesn't bother people...</p><p> </p><p> There are several workers that I just couldn't find DOBs for that I felt were worth adding. In their case I either estimated based on someone saying something about their age in a video or by watching their match on youtube or pictures and just guessing.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mattywood Posted February 14, 2014 Share Posted February 14, 2014 <blockquote data-ipsquote="" class="ipsQuote" data-ipsquote-username="justtxyank" data-cite="justtxyank" data-ipsquote-contentapp="forums" data-ipsquote-contenttype="forums" data-ipsquote-contentid="35547" data-ipsquote-contentclass="forums_Topic"><div>OK folks, almost there. Doing some new narratives and then running a few more tests and then she'll be released on you all.</div></blockquote><p> </p><p> And I'm fully committed to my WWF diary. Damn you updates! <img alt=":p" data-src="//content.invisioncic.com/g322608/emoticons/tongue.png.ceb643b2956793497cef30b0e944be28.png" src="<___base_url___>/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" /> KIDDING! <img alt=":D" data-src="//content.invisioncic.com/g322608/emoticons/biggrin.png.929299b4c121f473b0026f3d6e74d189.png" src="<___base_url___>/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" /></p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RatedRKO16 Posted February 14, 2014 Share Posted February 14, 2014 <blockquote data-ipsquote="" class="ipsQuote" data-ipsquote-username="justtxyank" data-cite="justtxyank" data-ipsquote-contentapp="forums" data-ipsquote-contenttype="forums" data-ipsquote-contentid="35547" data-ipsquote-contentclass="forums_Topic"><div>Just FYI, and I hope this doesn't bother people...<p> </p><p> There are several workers that I just couldn't find DOBs for that I felt were worth adding. In their case I either estimated based on someone saying something about their age in a video or by watching their match on youtube or pictures and just guessing.</p></div></blockquote><p> </p><p> Sounds fine by me <img alt=":)" data-src="//content.invisioncic.com/g322608/emoticons/smile.png.142cfa0a1cd2925c0463c1d00f499df2.png" src="<___base_url___>/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" /></p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mattywood Posted February 14, 2014 Share Posted February 14, 2014 <p>Can't remember how you handled Rachel Summerlyn's "relationship" to the Putski family, but I think we can lay the talk to rest now, as she is definitely <strong>not</strong> a member of the Putski family as I came across this:</p><p> </p><p> <a href="http://www.pwinsider.com/article/45337/ivan-putski-shoots-hard-updated-with-note-on-statements-regarding-shimmer.html?p=1" rel="external nofollow">http://www.pwinsider.com/article/45337/ivan-putski-shoots-hard-updated-with-note-on-statements-regarding-shimmer.html?p=1</a></p><p> </p><p> I always wondered if it was a he said/they said situation because for awhile, I only heard their side, and Scott Putski's side. But now if Ivan is chiming in saying she's not a part of their family, and knowing that Ivan and Scott are known not to BS people, then I would think it's safe to say not to put in a blood relative relationship involving Rachel and the Putskis. So for other mod-makers out there, you can update your Rachel Summerlyn bios now and take out any Blood Relative relationship with Ivan and Scott Putski.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jaysin Posted February 15, 2014 Share Posted February 15, 2014 <blockquote data-ipsquote="" class="ipsQuote" data-ipsquote-username="Matt Shannon" data-cite="Matt Shannon" data-ipsquote-contentapp="forums" data-ipsquote-contenttype="forums" data-ipsquote-contentid="35547" data-ipsquote-contentclass="forums_Topic"><div>Can't remember how you handled Rachel Summerlyn's "relationship" to the Putski family, but I think we can lay the talk to rest now, as she is definitely <strong>not</strong> a member of the Putski family as I came across this:<p> </p><p> <a href="http://www.pwinsider.com/article/45337/ivan-putski-shoots-hard-updated-with-note-on-statements-regarding-shimmer.html?p=1" rel="external nofollow">http://www.pwinsider.com/article/45337/ivan-putski-shoots-hard-updated-with-note-on-statements-regarding-shimmer.html?p=1</a></p><p> </p><p> I always wondered if it was a he said/they said situation because for awhile, I only heard their side, and Scott Putski's side. But now if Ivan is chiming in saying she's not a part of their family, and knowing that Ivan and Scott are known not to BS people, then I would think it's safe to say not to put in a blood relative relationship involving Rachel and the Putskis. So for other mod-makers out there, you can update your Rachel Summerlyn bios now and take out any Blood Relative relationship with Ivan and Scott Putski.</p></div></blockquote><p> </p><p> She's far too attractive to have somehow spawned from that family anyway <img alt=":p" data-src="//content.invisioncic.com/g322608/emoticons/tongue.png.ceb643b2956793497cef30b0e944be28.png" src="<___base_url___>/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png"></p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.