DjRelativity

Matt Hardy's Deletion matches didn't have commentary and they were better for it. Same with the Boneyard Match & Firefly Funhouse Match at Wrestlemania. I can't think of any cinematic matches that did have commentary. It seems the standard is to not have any in these kind of matches.

In Cinematic matches I like to remove the commentators just like in many of the real life wrestling cinematic fights. At the moment this incurs a penalty for not having announcers assigned to the match. As far as i'm aware, most cinematic matches don't have commentators. I think it would be great if the penalty was removed to better reflect reality.

The lengthy match penalty doesn't apply to Timed-entrance matches/ Battle Royales or Royal Rumbles. This was adjusted on a patch a while back

Ignore the hate. Your mods are awesome! Your picture pack design is revolutionary! Thanks for making this game more enjoyable for the community

I agree with this. Many times now I've pre-booked a match with an injured worker by accident.

<blockquote data-ipsquote="" class="ipsQuote" data-ipsquote-username="Self" data-cite="Self" data-ipsquote-contentapp="forums" data-ipsquote-contenttype="forums" data-ipsquote-contentid="50859" data-ipsquote-contentclass="forums_Topic"><div>They didn't start from zero. AEW are the equivalent of starting a new company on the "Easy" setting. With starting popularity across their country, money to spend on production values, the ability to get TV right away, etc. They didn't 'grow' it in the same way a Ring of Honour, Pro Wrestling Guerrilla etc came from nothing.</div></blockquote><p> </p><p> I do agree with this^^, except that AEW did need to produce a couple of acclaimed PPVs before TNT would even look at them.</p><p> </p><p> What I don't agree with is a 30 pop company needing 5000 people in attendance to gain any pop at all as this is near impossible with a company that size in the game. Even if you had the world's biggest stars headlining the shows. In reality if you signed big names it would attract bigger audiences and you would gain some recognition for that. It's how TNA rose to significance between 2004-2008. Big names = more viewers</p>

^^^ 100% with you on this

At the moment a tiny or insignificant company can't get past 30 popularity as they can't attract enough viewers, even if they put on incredible shows. In reality word would spread and they would get more popular. If you play as a low popularity company you are basically stuck even if you sign a load of world stars. So i'd argue this is in no way realistic. Big stars pull in viewers as does good shows. The way it is at the moment, you are basically stuck no matter how good the show is and how many stars you have. Take AEW for example, they have become Americas second most popular company in less than a year due to star power and great shows. You cant replicate this in TEW atm due to the restrictions.

I really like this idea. Like an AEW style rankings system. Similar to the system in WMMA

Thanks Adam You've been so excellent at listening to community feedback

If I put on an amazing show even as a tiny or insignificant company I should still gain popularity. In real life, word would spread how great the show was and more people would tune in to the next show. There should maybe be a system where if the show rating is 20+ higher than your popularity in that area, then you still gain popularity regardless of the popularity blocks, or at least gain more viewers to allow you to gain popularity. This change was brought in to reflect reality, but in reality, if something is amazing then people will talk and more people would watch the next show and you would gain popularity. The new system leaves smaller companies stuck and unable to progress. How are we supposed to gain popularity if a 30 pop company can't get more than 5000 viewers. Maybe I'm missing something here but this is how it appears to me. I get that you can turn this feature off, but the feature is supposed to reflect reality and I don't believe it does.

I 100% agree with this ^^

<blockquote data-ipsquote="" class="ipsQuote" data-ipsquote-username="gazwefc83" data-cite="gazwefc83" data-ipsquote-contentapp="forums" data-ipsquote-contenttype="forums" data-ipsquote-contentid="50407" data-ipsquote-contentclass="forums_Topic"><div>Nice one bud, that was doing my head in, I may even crack on with a new skin soon as that was going to be a pain in the ass</div></blockquote><p> </p><p> However, I have just noticed that this method doesn't work on the screen where you select your user character for some reason. It works literally everywhere else</p><p> </p><p> EDIT: Also I'm not sure WWF's core product should be Attitude Entertainment as the core product represents the companies DNA and WWF was only just beginning to add in edgier elements in 1996. I think their core should be Classic Sports Entertainment as this is what they are known for. You could maybe make the current product Attitude Entertainment but i'd say they were in a very slow transition at the time so they are between the two.</p>

<p>Not sure if you knew this, but you can use the default skin without issues if you follow the instructions below;</p><p> </p><p> - copy the file in the logos folder called GEN.jpg into the people folder and rename it _Blank Background.jpg </p><p> </p><p> This will fix the issues related to using .gif photos with the default skin.</p><p> </p><p> Hope this helps anyone who prefers the default skin</p><p> </p><p> EDIT: great mod btw =)</p>

WWE's ppv's aren't really ppv's it's now a subscription service not a PPV. PPV's are way more expensive, like £30-50 ($25-$40) a pop.