Jump to content

Zeel1

Members
  • Posts

    1,161
  • Joined

Posts posted by Zeel1

  1. "Awwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww shucky-ducky quack quack!"

     

    Pretty much sums up Booker T as a commentator, doesn't it?

     

    And yeah, Rhodes did good. Wouldn't mind seeing him challenge Orton before too long. Maybe it could be part of his campaign to restore the lineage of the Intercontinental Title, to try and hold it and the World Heavyweight Title simultaneously, to show it itself is on World Title level.

  2. <blockquote data-ipsquote="" class="ipsQuote" data-ipsquote-username="BHK1978" data-cite="BHK1978" data-ipsquote-contentapp="forums" data-ipsquote-contenttype="forums" data-ipsquote-contentid="25169" data-ipsquote-contentclass="forums_Topic"><div>Wait a minute that avatar has never been employed by the WWF and therefore cannot be posted in this thread!<p> </p><p> Now for something that is on topic, why oh why is Booker T. on commentary?</p><p> </p><p> Don't get me wrong I have always been a huge Booker T. fan but some people just do not have the talent to do commentary. And Booker T. is one of them.</p></div></blockquote><p> </p><p> "AwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW MAH GOOT-NESS~!"</p><p> </p><p> Yeah, he's pretty terrible...</p>
  3. Not surprised with the Nash/Punk segment. Nash is terrible on the mic if he can't bury people. And whilst what they said might have been funny for people on message boards, I wonder if the other 98% of fans had any clue what they were talking about and what they were going on about. They've not killed Punk but they've certainly put a grinding halt to his momentum with a segment that went right over the heads of the masses and wouldn't have done anything to encourage the people who did understand it to care about the feud. Not that any feud with Nash involved is going to help Punk, or anyone. Oh well. I'd mention the excruciatingly boring notion of John Cena once again kept in the title picture but I wouldn't want his superfan to come leaping in with cries of being a hater.

     

    I dunno, the crowd seemed pretty into it, and I always kinda figure that the majority of the crowds are of that 98%. As was stated, I don't really think they used too much inside stuff - people in the crowd may not have known about the infamous vanilla midget comment, sure, but I'm not sure if they needed to. It tells them that Nash tried to say Eddie couldn't cut it, and as Punk's the face and Nash is the heel, the crowd would immediately buy that, plus Nash didn't even argue it... and the crowd knows that was a despicable thing to do, so in theory they'd boo him for it even if they weren't previously aware of it.

×
×
  • Create New...