akujy

BFG was the worst PPV of the year IMO. That is not what one expects on TNA's biggest show of the year.

This looks interesting. What mod are you using?

<blockquote data-ipsquote="" class="ipsQuote" data-ipsquote-username="Greylocke" data-cite="Greylocke" data-ipsquote-contentapp="forums" data-ipsquote-contenttype="forums" data-ipsquote-contentid="25169" data-ipsquote-contentclass="forums_Topic"><div>You can pretty much ask the same question every time a big evil stable is in charge. Why didn't everyone just gang up on the evil McMahon and is Corporation back in the Attitude Era? Why didn't the whole roster unite against Vickie Guerrero and La Familia? Heck, why didn't the whole roster just get together and beat up the Shield for the last few months? Why were there never more than 3 guys getting together to fight them at the same time? I think history has told us that wrestlers for the most part are a self-centred bunch and it takes a lot for several of them to get together for a common cause. <img alt=":p" data-src="//content.invisioncic.com/g322608/emoticons/tongue.png.ceb643b2956793497cef30b0e944be28.png" src="<___base_url___>/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" /><p> </p><p> Actually, a very simple explanation in this case would be that most of the wrestlers don't even care that much about Daniel Bryan anyway. Daniel Bryan's character hasn't really been the most sociable guy. I mean, his best pal was Kane (who wasn't around on RAW), and even Kane couldn't stand him half the time! I really don't think half the roster cares enough about him to risk antagonising the boss. Yes, it was an injustice, but if the good guys are running out to help every time someone is in need we'll be seeing random run-ins in 90% of the matches and angles in wrestling.</p></div></blockquote><p> </p><p> You guys are over thinking this. It's like in the RW, when your boss is an evil dictator and there is no union to defend you. You can try and do a strike, or you can go to work and accept his evilness. People would only need to stop working and they wouldn't be able to fire everyone. That is not what happens most of the time. People have to feed their wife and kids.</p>

Yup. I remember that one. I laughed a lot when you mentioned it in the chat, during the live broadcast. And I think it was a little demeaning to them. Aren't they some sort of anti rules/authority figures sort of stable, serving their own justice? It really looks anti gimmick. But nothing that will burry them.

This is all pretty much amazing to me. That is all I will say. I don't even know Stennick, but as I also don't like Cena and I know Shawn, I have no right to express myself. And good for me. People are talking about my posts, awesome. I have no idea how much of Shawn's posts I commented exactly, but I'm pretty sure that most of my posts are probably associated with his. He was the main reason why I got to know this place, and his dynasty was the main reason I posted in recent days. I'm usually one of those users that mostly reeds and never talks that much but I learned my lesson. I can only post where I'm told to post and It seems my opinion is not relevant because I know Shawn. Good for me. Good for me! Now I know where I am not allowed to post! Sorry Shawn, it seems I have to avoid every single one of your posts. Good for me!

<blockquote data-ipsquote="" class="ipsQuote" data-ipsquote-username="Stennick" data-cite="Stennick" data-ipsquote-contentapp="forums" data-ipsquote-contenttype="forums" data-ipsquote-contentid="25169" data-ipsquote-contentclass="forums_Topic"><div>So you're saying if john cena took on a different persona tomorrow if he was someone completely different with a new gimmick people wouldn't hate him. Shawn is saying he would still hate him no.matter what character he played does that mean you hate ziggler because he was a spirit squad member or any wrestler for their last gimmick.<p> </p><p> No my point is that unless you hate john as a person then there is no reason you wouldn't say its not possible to like him in another role. Didn't anyone envision Steve Austin when he was the ringmaster....certainly not in the way we got him same goes for the Rock Shawn Michaels and tons of wrestlers who's gimmicks evolved and changed completely. So to say there is no way that any worker can't become something you would be interested in is either extreme shirt sightedness and delusion or you just aren't a fan of pro wrestling. </p><p> </p><p> My point isn't that you can't and shouldn't hate his character its that nobody should say there is nothing any worker can do to.become interesting since wrestling has proven all of us wrong on that front constantly. </p><p> </p><p> So maybe you should "say no to drugs" if you're too burnt out to comprehend the debate at hand...</p></div></blockquote><p> </p><p> You are the one not understanding the debate. What I said was that Shawn is right and you are wrong. And both of you keep having this discusion because you are always thinking that Shawn is thinking something he is not. Why do you even have these discussions? I have no idea. You guys seem to get along well, from what I've seen around the boards. But I agree with Shawn when it comes to Cena. You can't possibly think we are the only ones.</p>

<blockquote data-ipsquote="" class="ipsQuote" data-ipsquote-username="Stennick" data-cite="Stennick" data-ipsquote-contentapp="forums" data-ipsquote-contenttype="forums" data-ipsquote-contentid="25169" data-ipsquote-contentclass="forums_Topic"><div><strong> So please if there are so many people who agree with you and are willing to say "yes no matter what John Cena does we will hate him for all the end of time" then point to them</strong>. Because I'm betting 99.9999 percent of the people on here and reality are in the camp of "I hate the way the WWE pushes him but there are certainly things they could do to make me like him again and overall I think he's an average human being". You however don't seem to feel this way and I seriously get a Mark David Chapman vibe from you.</div></blockquote><p> </p><p> I'm one of those guys. He's not alone. I see tons of people chanting Cena sucks and you think Shawn is the only one to hate him? Say no to drugs.</p>

I agree with SM82 on this one. Stennick could have said the things he said without using the tone he did. Shawn was man enough to admit he shouldn't have said "all the IWC." Stennick is never man enough to admit he talks to people like the petulant guy he is. SM82 is not alone. I hate Cena and i know lots of people that also do. I go to wrestling forums daily and see a lot of people that hate him. What does that say about those people? Nothing, except the fact they hate him. Stennick acted like a douche. Admit it and move on.

But what a turn. it's not every day that we see someone turning by hitting a finisher on the Rock these days. And on that situation. That was nice.

Punk Turn...and still the WWE champion! Hell yeah!

Well Rock is coming to the Show, and they are promoting his comeback with this "Title pursuit statements" he made after Mania, so yeah, i can see him involved somehow. I just hope Cena becomes the 1st ever MITb winner to fail his cash in.

Very debatable. But each one with it's own opinion. And although you're not wrong, i think the other side is also true.

So true. We would stop analyzing every single move and word, and so on. God those days were fun. Still love wrestling, but it was much more fun then. What? The 5x, 5x, 5x 5x,...WCW world champ, and you think he sucks??? Are you kidding? Of course he sucks! God how he sucks at it! He doesn't even suck to the point of being a guilty pleasure, wich is sad. He just...sucks and although i like him, (as a wrestler) i definitely could live wihout his nonsensical commentary!

I have no idea why they chose the guys/girls they chose to win if they are not going to sign them. They should chose people they intend to sign as winners. I just don't get it.

Can you be more clear? I didn't got that one. Who are you talking about?