Jump to content

Peter.1986

Members
  • Posts

    909
  • Joined

Everything posted by Peter.1986

  1. There's a reason in stings head. Look at all former wcw wrestlers, Jericho, guerrero, big show, Booker t, even Goldberg was uncooperative but still got win over the Rock and others, hulk hogan, loads out there have gone on to do wells Sting saw the the rock turn round to Booker t and say who are you and that was the reason he didn't want to join to have to start from scratch. What sting didn't realise was the rock said that to everyone at the time it wasn't a burying the wcw thing. I donagree about the product been rubbish I don't really watch it at all. But don't forget vince has buried himself and his family on many occasions, he does what he thinks is right for the company, letting sting debut at wrestlemania is what's good for the company. Nobody else would have got that opportunity.
  2. If taker would have lost it would have made the streak much more irrelevant. The streak is still talked about and will go down in history. Brock has the title of the only person to beat taker, taker has a streak that can't be matched and 1 loss is significant. Add another loss in there and the streak with 2 losses becomes much more irrelevant, and something that will go down in the history books will have a lot less significance to it. Plus Look at the difference between Brock then and wyatt now, wyatt is not at that level to justify making undertakers streak become irrelevant
  3. Are you an old WCW fan by any chance? Again like I said earlier vince would have no benefit from burying wcw. As he owns that (or what's left) so anything wcw he makes money from. To be fair sting has been treated extremely well. Not wrestling ever for Wwe and his debut match at wrestlemania If sting joined back when Goldberg did he would have had a good run.
  4. Well I don't really watch wrestling anymore but I am a wrestling fan, and due to playing TEW it actually got me guessing what they were going to do. For me though a lot of people who watch it these days aren't happy, and don't get me wrong it's a shadow of its former self, but people are unhappy with certain people winning and certain people losing? The rock was my favourite wrestler to the point I stopped watching it when he started taking time out, but when he lost did I think that bull? No. I hated kurt angle and every time he beat the rock I just thought you got lucky or he couldn't beat him fairly, and that's how it's supposed to be looked at. Anyway I was talking yesterday about it and here are what i think. Big show winning I didn't really know who was going to be in this, but the big show has had a lot of heat (not the good heat) and they need to start getting him over with the fans one way or another, because there's no denying he can be. Plus who better to win the Andre the giant memorial than the closest thing to the giant himself? Daniel Bryan If someone said here's a million pound you have to put it on a bet then this would be the one, Daniel Bryan needed to win no matter what, the fans have changed so much over the years, that if they don't accept one thing it spoils the rest of the night, I thought they would have found a way to get him in the title match, but seen as he wasn't he HAD to win. This one I think was obvious Seth Rollins There was no way Roman reigns was walking out champion that's for sure, i originally thought it would go the Yoko, bret, hogan way, reigns would win Brock (with some help from the rock) then Rollins would cash in and win. I wasn't far off, Rollins is a much better champ than reigns, I reckon they need to turn reigns heel because he's already getting heel heat. Turn Brock face, anyway as soon as I saw a picture and it was the open arena I just thought it would play out exactly like the wrestlemania with yoko and bret, wasn't far off though Triple H I was 50/50 on this, I thought sting would probably not wrestle if he was going to lose because of what he's said in the past, and I thought they may go with it because they want him for marketing purposes (sting is much more valuable to them outside the ring than in it) and thought maybe triple h would do the job for this reason. I also thought well really this guy has never wrestled in Wwe, for years he has been skating them, does he just come in on the biggest event and beat someone who's wrestled for 20years at the Wwe? So really if they could get sting to accept a loss and get him on board it's a win, win. He has done nothing to deserve a win here. And to be honest the way they did it sounds really good Undertaker Well again I was 50/50. I thought with the streak ending last year they would want to give undertaker a win because the streak is not over is it really, it's something that goes down in history and is going to be talked about for years, so if taker lost then last years match becomes less of a talking point and the record isn't as good. But on the other hand I thought they might use it to put wyatt over as taker doesn't wrestle much. I personally from a watching point of view would have enjoyed it more if I watched undertaker win, I don't think it can harm wyatt losing to undertaker at wrestlemania. I mean look at everyone else he beat. I also can't believe that he would lose fans because he lost lol Cena I think along with Bryan winning and Rollins cashing in this was another obvious one. Mr merchandise v Mr Russia in the old America v whoever it's at war against. Cena is still the biggest star outside the ring but is dropping inside it, so a rusev generates loads of heat and get beat at wrestlemania by the biggest selling star. One last thing, people that go on about vince and WCW Do you realise vince owns WCW or what is left of it? He owns all the footage and everything, he doesn't want to make wcw seem weak. Why should sting win? He's never wrestled in wwe before why should he win? As far a burying wcw in the first place, none of the top WCW stars came over anyway to begin with, plus as a WWF fan at the time for the WCW to come in and beat the top wwf wrestlers it just wouldn't have cut it with most people, there's a reason Wwe won the war, so why would you take the oppositions wrestlers and make them beat yours who won the war lol
  5. I was waiting for a 93' mod, but decided to run with 91' mod, with workers set all the way up to 2014, so I'm in this for the long run. I'm just a little bit torn between what to do. I'm a wwf man, so pretty much any game or era I always use WWF. But ive seen a dynasty for WWF and one for NWA (WCW) So I'm torn between these 2 options. Starting as WWF and obviously having the current star power, hulk, savage, warrior, perfect etc. having to take them through the steriod a scandle (which on a number of occasions drops their popularuty throught the years so that will be a challenge) then having to put up with WCW getting lots of money and challenging that. Or setting a new national promotion up and basically going up against WCW and WWF from 91 to the current day and seeing how it would have been to have 3 major companies going at it, there's currently a lot of decent people I could pick up to begin with. I could do with help to decide
  6. After 1 year of game time I am finally releasing my diary for 'the battle of the immortals' It is basically war of the immortals database where I have set up an elite company and slowly one by one take over the other companies, once I have the pick of the bunch I will reopen the other companies (eras) to pick up other wrestlers on PPA's The reason I am releasing it now is because I am at a stage where I have lots of the major stars and I am ready to have people come up with ideas, storylines, dream fueds for me to play out. It does start with a few wrestlers who would never make the hall of immortals, but I figured it was better to build it up that way, rather than just have them all to start with without a story line. For anyone who wants to start predicting (winners will get to pick a feud, storyline or worker to push or sign) here is the link. http://www.greydogsoftware.com/forum/showthread.php?t=530712
  7. I'm looking for a mod starting early 90's, but with as many future workers as possible to the current day. I see there's a 91, 94, 95. I would prefer 91, but has it got many future workers? I want a long game to run as long as I can with real life workers. Could anyone let me know which would be best?
×
×
  • Create New...