fatallylost

That would also depend on IF they had a TV show in the slot. Not movies, specials, or reruns. Which I don't recall them having. I could be wrong though, my memory ain't what it once was.

<blockquote data-ipsquote="" class="ipsQuote" data-ipsquote-username="lazorbeak" data-cite="lazorbeak" data-ipsquote-contentapp="forums" data-ipsquote-contenttype="forums" data-ipsquote-contentid="25169" data-ipsquote-contentclass="forums_Topic"><div>Yeah no unless HGH causes Danielson to grow at least 4 inches of height and gives him a personality, fans don't think he has star power because he <span style="text-decoration:underline;">doesn't look like a star</span>. Yes, he was champion in ROH, but did he get the same attention guys like Samoa Joe or CM Punk received? Did ROH's audience pay to see him wrestle or buy his dvds in the same numbers as those other guys? And now that he's in front of a wider audience his shortcomings in the "star quality" department are pretty hard to miss. I know workrate marks love the guy but seriously it's like saying Dean Malenko could've been world champ if only he had gas-ed up a bit.</div></blockquote><p> </p><p> Michael Cole? Is that you?!</p><p> </p><p> It's naive to say he has no personality. I've seen him live, and he's funny as ****. You do get that WWE puts across what it wants, right?</p>

DVR numbers are bull. I don't mind them adding live and dvr views, but, it's meaningless. Sometimes people have things to do on Monday night, not every week, so, the numbers can fluctuate in any number of ways.

<blockquote data-ipsquote="" class="ipsQuote" data-ipsquote-username="Stennick" data-cite="Stennick" data-ipsquote-contentapp="forums" data-ipsquote-contenttype="forums" data-ipsquote-contentid="25169" data-ipsquote-contentclass="forums_Topic"><div>He was Mr. Wrestlemania for "stealing the show" at Mania. Nearly every year he was involved in Wrestlemania he had the best match on the card so they were playing up the fact that nobody had more "classic" matches at Mania than Shawn Michaels. True or not it had nothing to do with his record thats what they had Taker for. It was the Most Dominant Wrestlemania worker against the greatest wrestlemania performer</div></blockquote><p> </p><p> Not to mention he was PWI match of the year for the majority of the 2000's, quite a few of those being Wrestlemania matches.</p>

I'll agree with that. I know what the gimmick was in FCW, so, it seemed Punk was the complete opposite. But, it seems to have stalled some. But, I'm still hooked for the payoff to that.

I'm not sure of you cable/satellite situation. Personally, I have Time Warner, and I watch Raw on HD at 6, and TNA comes on at 9, so I can watch/record either of them. Same way I always got to see Raw and Nitro back in the day.

I agree, in part. I like Slater, but, it just looks like he's trying too hard to do... something. I don't even know what. Although, Tarver, never cared. I was there for Shamrock, Blackman, all the way until Big Show boxer month. If I wanted to see a boxer/MMA fight, guess what I'd watch? I can see Slater possibly, Gabriel, and maybe one or two of the other guys connecting, depending on how the next 2 months go. But, I just can't see someone like Tarver, or Sheffield getting over anytime soon with those gimmicks. At least Otunga has the A lister thing, and Danielson needs no explanation. Young maybe, I'm not a fan of his look, just cause something about him looks very off putting to me. But, we shall see.

<blockquote data-ipsquote="" class="ipsQuote" data-ipsquote-username="Hyde Hill" data-cite="Hyde Hill" data-ipsquote-contentapp="forums" data-ipsquote-contenttype="forums" data-ipsquote-contentid="25169" data-ipsquote-contentclass="forums_Topic"><div>So this puts the total of active "real" tag teams in the E on 2 right? Hart Dynasty and Croft and Barreta aka Dude Busters? As given Lawlers commentary during Dibiase vs Christian it seems Rhodes and him are fully through as well.</div></blockquote><p> </p><p> I'm not sure we can count the Dudebusters. Since ECW closed, they were on one Smackdown, right? Unless they're on superstars, which I don't tend to watch.</p>

Look five posts before yours, and you'll get that answer.

This is how bad Masters' first run was. I don't even remember those programs! I recall the Masterlock Randomness, but, I guess I just erased him from my mind. Also, I'm sure I'm stating the obvious, and, maybe there'll be a swerve to it. But, now that they announced how NXT will be run, is it the easy guess Danielson wins, and challenges Miz for the US strap? I've been assuming that would happen after this run of rookies ended, but, that made it seem more obvious.

That's not news. Sting's always had an affinity for long, thick, black wood. Unless his bat was aluminum, but, it's not as funny that way.

The man speaks the truth. Are you referring to Sonny Siaki? That's messed up man...

As long as he doesn't look Scott Steiner old, I think we'll be ok.

Is it just me, or, is that weak? I mean, ECW hasn't been ECW since the first One Night Stand. So, why change the name, if it's going to focus on up and comers, in theory, why not just let it be ECW?

Someone get the Katie Vick video and shut that kid up. Also, I'm so glad I found that I can watch live Raw on my cable system. I'm having TNA recorded, and will get to it when I do. I really haven't watched in ages, it's always just utter crap when I've tuned in lately.

Probably being an uninformed American, I thought I heard that the "Oz" thing was sort of like calling it Old Zealand, since there is new. Maybe it was a tv show, a joke, who knows. I heard that a million years ago.

Also, WWF had a PPV called Ground Zero, I believe it was an in your house. Reckless abandon is also a Blink 182 song,