RKOwnage Posted December 30, 2013 Share Posted December 30, 2013 <p>According to Wikipedia, Rodney Mack died of a mixture of pain killers and cocaine yesterday (Dec. 28th).</p><p> </p><p> It doesn't have a source, and I can't find it anywhere else on the internet, so it might just be a random hoax? Don't understand why though.</p><p> </p><p> And yes, I was on Rodney Mack's Wikipedia page individually <_<</p> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dawn Posted December 30, 2013 Share Posted December 30, 2013 <blockquote data-ipsquote="" class="ipsQuote" data-ipsquote-username="RKOwnage" data-cite="RKOwnage" data-ipsquote-contentapp="forums" data-ipsquote-contenttype="forums" data-ipsquote-contentid="25169" data-ipsquote-contentclass="forums_Topic"><div>According to Wikipedia, Rodney Mack died of a mixture of pain killers and cocaine yesterday (Dec. 28th).<p> </p><p> It doesn't have a source, and I can't find it anywhere else on the internet, so it might just be a random hoax? Don't understand why though.</p><p> </p><p> And yes, I was on Rodney Mack's Wikipedia page individually <_><p> </p><p> It has to, i don't find it too.</p></_></p></div></blockquote> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TakerNGN74 Posted December 30, 2013 Share Posted December 30, 2013 <blockquote data-ipsquote="" class="ipsQuote" data-ipsquote-username="RKOwnage" data-cite="RKOwnage" data-ipsquote-contentapp="forums" data-ipsquote-contenttype="forums" data-ipsquote-contentid="25169" data-ipsquote-contentclass="forums_Topic"><div>According to Wikipedia, Rodney Mack died of a mixture of pain killers and cocaine yesterday (Dec. 28th).<p> </p><p> It doesn't have a source, and I can't find it anywhere else on the internet, so it might just be a random hoax? Don't understand why though.</p><p> </p><p> And yes, I was on Rodney Mack's Wikipedia page individually <_<</p></div></blockquote><p> </p><p> lol at you believing anything posted on Wikipedia, you know that that website is an open source website meaning anyone can edit it so I wouldn't believe anything you see on Wikipedia until it's backed up by some sort of report elsewhere.</p><p> </p><p> Also @Smasher 1311 Thanks for spoiling an entire week of TV for everyone next time please put any spoilers in White so people don't have to read them if they don't want to.</p><p> </p><p> Thank you.</p> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rickymex Posted December 30, 2013 Share Posted December 30, 2013 <blockquote data-ipsquote="" class="ipsQuote" data-ipsquote-username="TakerNGN74" data-cite="TakerNGN74" data-ipsquote-contentapp="forums" data-ipsquote-contenttype="forums" data-ipsquote-contentid="25169" data-ipsquote-contentclass="forums_Topic"><div>.<p> Also @Smasher 1311 Thanks for spoiling an entire week of TV for everyone next time please <strong>put any spoilers in White</strong> so people don't have to read them if they don't want to.</p></div></blockquote><p> </p><p> I read spoilers so it doesn't affect me but this.</p> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dawn Posted December 30, 2013 Share Posted December 30, 2013 <blockquote data-ipsquote="" class="ipsQuote" data-ipsquote-username="TakerNGN74" data-cite="TakerNGN74" data-ipsquote-contentapp="forums" data-ipsquote-contenttype="forums" data-ipsquote-contentid="25169" data-ipsquote-contentclass="forums_Topic"><div>lol at you believing anything posted on Wikipedia, you know that that website is an open source website meaning anyone can edit it so I wouldn't believe anything you see on Wikipedia until it's backed up by some sort of report elsewhere.<p> </p><p> Also @Smasher 1311 Thanks for spoiling an entire week of TV for everyone next time please put any spoilers in White so people don't have to read them if they don't want to.</p><p> </p><p> Thank you.</p></div></blockquote><p> </p><p> That's why there is the warning of *May Contain Spoilers* on the thread, but ok, i'll do it.</p><p> </p><p> Sorry. <img alt=":(" data-src="//content.invisioncic.com/g322608/emoticons/frown.png.e6b571745a30fe6a6f2e918994141a47.png" src="<___base_url___>/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png"></p> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TakerNGN74 Posted December 30, 2013 Share Posted December 30, 2013 <blockquote data-ipsquote="" class="ipsQuote" data-ipsquote-username="Smasher1311" data-cite="Smasher1311" data-ipsquote-contentapp="forums" data-ipsquote-contenttype="forums" data-ipsquote-contentid="25169" data-ipsquote-contentclass="forums_Topic"><div>That's why there is the warning of *May Contain Spoilers* on the thread, but ok, i'll do it.<p> </p><p> Sorry. <img alt=":(" data-src="//content.invisioncic.com/g322608/emoticons/frown.png.e6b571745a30fe6a6f2e918994141a47.png" src="<___base_url___>/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" /></p></div></blockquote><p> </p><p> Sorry that I came off so rude in my last post but I just don't like being spoiled if I don't want to be, yes the title in this thread states "May Contain Spoilers" but the majority of the people who post them on here still post them in white. That way people have an option of being spoiled to whats going to happen or not.</p> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RKOwnage Posted December 30, 2013 Share Posted December 30, 2013 <blockquote data-ipsquote="" class="ipsQuote" data-ipsquote-username="TakerNGN74" data-cite="TakerNGN74" data-ipsquote-contentapp="forums" data-ipsquote-contenttype="forums" data-ipsquote-contentid="25169" data-ipsquote-contentclass="forums_Topic"><div>lol at you believing anything posted on Wikipedia, you know that that website is an open source website meaning anyone can edit it so I wouldn't believe anything you see on Wikipedia until it's backed up by some sort of report elsewhere.</div></blockquote><p> </p><p> I didn't necessarily believe it, hence why I looked for sources, but it's just one of those things that like...why would that be a hoax... it's so irrelevant to anything that it's probably true >_></p><p> </p><p> And yes, I've been using the internet for more than a month, I know it's open source lol.</p><p> </p><p> That being said, it's been taken down now. It makes no sense as to why someone would make that up.</p> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stennick Posted December 30, 2013 Share Posted December 30, 2013 <p>People make things up for the simple fact of making things up. It happens across all divisions of media on a daily basis. Wouldn't this be like a White House journalist saying "I have no idea why someone would make something up about this politician"? </p><p> </p><p> It didn't make sense for anyone to say the Ultimate Warrior died either. </p><p> </p><p> Anyway next time save the RIP's for something a bit more stable and credible than wikipedia. Remember when that kid posted a lie about the Benoit story hours before that lie became eerily similar to what happened?</p> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RKOwnage Posted December 30, 2013 Share Posted December 30, 2013 <blockquote data-ipsquote="" class="ipsQuote" data-ipsquote-username="Stennick" data-cite="Stennick" data-ipsquote-contentapp="forums" data-ipsquote-contenttype="forums" data-ipsquote-contentid="25169" data-ipsquote-contentclass="forums_Topic"><div>People make things up for the simple fact of making things up. It happens across all divisions of media on a daily basis. Wouldn't this be like a White House journalist saying "I have no idea why someone would make something up about this politician"? <p> </p><p> It didn't make sense for anyone to say the Ultimate Warrior died either. </p><p> </p><p> Anyway next time save the RIP's for something a bit more stable and credible than wikipedia. Remember when that kid posted a lie about the Benoit story hours before that lie became eerily similar to what happened?</p></div></blockquote><p> </p><p> It wasn't an RIP, it was something random I found while on the Internet, not once did I say anything about it being definitely factual. It's essentially got the same credibility of a dirt sheet which gets posted in here often, but it was something peculiar I ran into.</p><p> </p><p> Only difference between the Warrior and Rodney friggin' Mack is that the Warrior has some notoriety and that would get a rise out of people and perhaps cause chaos. Rodney Mack? Not so sure. Someone's obviously just a moron.</p> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
20LEgend Posted December 31, 2013 Share Posted December 31, 2013 V. interested to see how this Bryan stuff plays out. The ending with the fans chanting his name looked really good and played into it well. It's one of those Raw's that happen ever so often that seem to hit the reset switch. Can't wait for next week's show now for the first time in a while Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jaysin Posted December 31, 2013 Share Posted December 31, 2013 Just read about the end of Raw. The rest of the show looked bleh, but I'll watch it tomorrow just for the end. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warhawk8492 Posted December 31, 2013 Share Posted December 31, 2013 This was worthy of the 2013 Golden Gooker. Terrible ending to RAW. Turn Daniel Bryan back face. Here is too hoping the Wyatts get nuclear X Pac heat. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RKOwnage Posted December 31, 2013 Share Posted December 31, 2013 Agreed with 20LEgend. Don't know where this is going, but I'm excited to see it progress. It's a risk, and I want to see how it unfolds. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Warhawk8492 Posted December 31, 2013 Share Posted December 31, 2013 Agreed with 20LEgend. Don't know where this is going, but I'm excited to see it progress. It's a risk, and I want to see how it unfolds. I can't see very much good coming from this at all just an attempt to bury Daniel Bryan. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UkWrestleFan Posted December 31, 2013 Share Posted December 31, 2013 I can't see very much good coming from this at all just an attempt to bury Daniel Bryan. Hardly. For me, it seems like an effort to help get the Wyatt's more over. They'll gain some major heat while the fans will continue to get behind Bryan, clamouring for him to find his way and finally overcome the Wyatt's. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
djthefunkchris Posted December 31, 2013 Share Posted December 31, 2013 I can't see very much good coming from this at all just an attempt to bury Daniel Bryan. How does anyone come to this conclusion? The group of friends I watch wrestling with have been jokingly referring to RAW as the Daniel Bryan show, pretty much all year. If it has something to do with him not holding the title, it should be kind of obvious why people might be interested in what. happens next. Now smarks can hope the Wyatt's get behind him, possibly protecting him from wrong doings... There is no reason a smark or iwc fan should be gullible enough to believe the storyline currently running is real fact, especially when Daniel Bryan takes up 1/3rd of a three hour show. If you are going to burry someone, you have them on only long enough to have them lose, not having the show built around them. I'm using a new toy typing this, and rereading what I typed looks a bit more serious then I meant. My biggest point is only why the storyline just gained more interest. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UkWrestleFan Posted December 31, 2013 Share Posted December 31, 2013 the Wyatt's get behind him, possibly protecting him from wrong doings... Would love to see the storyline go this way and Bryan be a legit member of the Wyatt's who have his back and make sure he isn't getting screwed over etc. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UkWrestleFan Posted December 31, 2013 Share Posted December 31, 2013 It would also be great to see Kane turn on The Authority and for him & Bray Wyatt to reveal it was all part of their plan. The more I think about it, the more I hope this will be the start of a Wyatt's / Bryan / Kane vs The Authority storyline. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Macca316 Posted December 31, 2013 Share Posted December 31, 2013 I can't see very much good coming from this at all just an attempt to bury Daniel Bryan. Is this story line going to make Bryan any less over? Answer: No. Is this story line going to keep him busy? Yup Basically as far as I can see its basic wrestling 101, You want to get guys over, put them with the hottest comodity on the show which at the moment is Daniel Bryan, few weeks ago before TLC did he not derail an entire segment for a period due to the fans chanting his name... Also I agree with the previous, its hardly burying him when he is in the main event of the show instead of the champion, smells to me like WWE are building the show round Bryan. Just cos he's not the champ is in no way damaging to him and I see this whole programme with the Wyatts as benifit to them, They get some overness and heat from working with Bryan. Also why would you even wish they get X-Pac heat? Bray Wyatt is one of the most interesting gimmicks to hit wrestling in a long time, He could easily be the Raven for a new age... If they do get X-Pac heat then what will you jump on here and say WWE screwed the opertunity with Wyatt and they aren't making new stars? Rest my case. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
milamber Posted January 1, 2014 Share Posted January 1, 2014 <p>Raw was good considering half the roster were doing house shows. Rollins is getting a chance his chance to shine, though his match with Cena last week was better. Props to Fandango for using adding a modified Indian Deathlock to his moveset. Lesnar destroying Henry was awesome.</p><p> </p><p> Lots of backlash from the IWC over the Bryan/Wyatts feud who think nothing less than a championship feud is good enough for Bryan. He's over as hell and gets more wrestling time than most of the roster. Sure, the Wyatts aren't as over the Shield but its a decent feud. Bray needs to improve in-ring. Rowen looked viscious tossing Bryan about (but he's still a bit green) and Harper is good. I marked out for Bryan's turn because I never thought Creative would have the balls to go through with it.</p><p> </p><p> <a href="http://www.cagesideseats.com/wwe-raw/2013/12/31/5262374/wwe-stars-react-to-daniel-bryan-joining-the-wyatt-family-on-raw-video" rel="external nofollow">Raw Backstage Fallout - Punk comments on Bryan's turn</a></p><p> </p><p> The show did good ratings. It averaged 4.12 million viewers for all three hours.</p><p> </p><p> Hour one: 4.14 million</p><p> Hour two: 4.20 million</p><p> Hour three: 4.04 million</p><p> </p><p> Punk vs The Shield and Bryan vs The Wyatts is good for business.</p> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arrows Posted January 2, 2014 Share Posted January 2, 2014 <blockquote data-ipsquote="" class="ipsQuote" data-ipsquote-username="milamber" data-cite="milamber" data-ipsquote-contentapp="forums" data-ipsquote-contenttype="forums" data-ipsquote-contentid="25169" data-ipsquote-contentclass="forums_Topic"><div>Punk vs The Shield and Bryan vs The Wyatts is good for business.</div></blockquote><p> </p><p> Cept, now it's not Bryan vs. The Wyatts. Hope is for Bryan to use the Wyatt's up through the rumble and his whole turn being him using them to get himself the rumble win and Mania title shot.</p><p> </p><p> Then all we have to hope for is Punk winning at EC, and we might have a Mania main event worth watching this year. Given the rule of Mania main events, it can't be Bryan vs. Cena or Orton. It can't be Cena vs. Orton. Severly limits what's left that could actually main event the biggest show of the year.</p> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
milamber Posted January 2, 2014 Share Posted January 2, 2014 <blockquote data-ipsquote="" class="ipsQuote" data-ipsquote-username="Arrows" data-cite="Arrows" data-ipsquote-contentapp="forums" data-ipsquote-contenttype="forums" data-ipsquote-contentid="25169" data-ipsquote-contentclass="forums_Topic"><div>Cept, now it's not Bryan vs. The Wyatts. Hope is for Bryan to use the Wyatt's up through the rumble and his whole turn being him using them to get himself the rumble win and Mania title shot.<p> </p><p> Then all we have to hope for is Punk winning at EC, and we might have a Mania main event worth watching this year. Given the rule of Mania main events, it can't be Bryan vs. Cena or Orton. It can't be Cena vs. Orton. Severly limits what's left that could actually main event the biggest show of the year.</p></div></blockquote><p> </p><p> Well at least they're getting Cena vs Orton out of the way before WM. Only way Punk or Bryan don't main event WM is if Batista or Lesnar win the Rumble. Or they throw a curveball and someone like Sheamus or Reigns wins the Rumble.</p> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
milamber Posted January 2, 2014 Share Posted January 2, 2014 <p>"Big Time" Brodus Clay got a new look and some mic time on Main Event.</p><p> </p><p> <a href="http://www.wwe.com/shows/wwemainevent/2014-01-01/results-26173077/page-3" rel="external nofollow">http://www.wwe.com/shows/wwemainevent/2014-01-01/results-26173077/page-3</a></p> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arrows Posted January 2, 2014 Share Posted January 2, 2014 <blockquote data-ipsquote="" class="ipsQuote" data-ipsquote-username="milamber" data-cite="milamber" data-ipsquote-contentapp="forums" data-ipsquote-contenttype="forums" data-ipsquote-contentid="25169" data-ipsquote-contentclass="forums_Topic"><div>Well at least they're getting Cena vs Orton out of the way before WM. Only way Punk or Bryan don't main event WM is if Batista or Lesnar win the Rumble. Or they throw a curveball and someone like Sheamus or Reigns wins the Rumble.</div></blockquote><p> </p><p> I really don't get the point behind bringing Batista back, at all. We have Brock, we have Reigns, what role is Batista going to fill here? He's just another jacked up guy who couldn't hold a candle to Brock on his best day and Brock's worst, and any good that could've come from a return has been tossed away by advertising his return a month in advance, and then bringing Brock back out of nowhere right in the middle of said hype.</p> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Teh_Showtime Posted January 2, 2014 Share Posted January 2, 2014 <p>I dont see how people can think Bryan "joining" the Wyatts would be bad in any fashion. Bray and his boys have looked like idiots for months constantly losing to Punk and Bryan and they finally have some juice to run with now instead of just being full of empty threats. On the other side, Bryan presumably is changing for the time being with months before WM and its pretty obvious he will turn back soon enough, and when he does it will have him in a better place than when he started. I don't know what else the story can do since he's obviously not booked in the WWE title match so working with Bray before snapping out of it at the Rumble seems to be the way to go.</p><p> </p><p> As for Batista, not really hyped for him, especially if he's gonna be a face because the roster is in dire need of heels (only Orton and now Lesnar can close a PPV). It's a nice boost of star power, so I can see why they did it. I'm just wary because pretty much every year this happens and there ends up being multiple guys shafted at WM because they have to go into a filler match due to time restraints. It is borderline criminal that a guy like Ziggler has yet to have a singles match at WM.</p> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.