Striking Moves need a size limit

[BuddyGarner]

Although perhaps the current 4 sizes bigger isn't enough for strikes. It doesn't make sense for a roundhouse body punch to be used by a midgit against a giant.

 

Many moves do not seem feasible to be used by wrestlers of extremes in size.

 

This also takes a lot from the high flying moves as most of the time using strikes is better.

 

There is a possibility of limiting size universally for all standing/charging strikes but there are instances where strikes makes sense such as dropkicks.

[Blake Trask]

This is why bracing exists though. It's built in that strikes are less effective against bigger opponents.

[BuddyGarner]

<blockquote data-ipsquote="" class="ipsQuote" data-ipsquote-username="Blake Trask" data-cite="Blake Trask" data-ipsquote-contentapp="forums" data-ipsquote-contenttype="forums" data-ipsquote-contentid="37462" data-ipsquote-contentclass="forums_Topic"><div>This is why bracing exists though. It's built in that strikes are less effective against bigger opponents.</div></blockquote><p> </p><p> You can use face rake or standing submissions until they're below normal momentum. It's really not realistic for a midgit to be able to do a face rake or a side headlock on a giant.</p><p> </p><p> But the issue isn't so much low level moves as flying double axe handle is a pretty good move.</p><p> </p><p> The issue is more medium+ where bracing isn't feasible. There's no reason to use high flying moves over strike moves. However, this could change if striking moves became limited on size.</p>

[Blake Trask]

iirc fewer high flying moves can be flat out blocked, they tend to have to be avoided or countered, which is an advantage to flying around right there.