mwalter Posted February 18, 2017 Share Posted February 18, 2017 I usually let the cpu determine the depth chart by hitting "suggest," but I'm wondering if that's a good idea. I recently got burned several times by a 1st team CB who was out of position several times late in the game, along with missing a key tackle. I suspect that the fact that this CB has an instinct rating in the 40's is a big part of the problem. The depth chart has another CB at number four who has similar ratings for most attributes, but an instinct rating that is twice as high. My question, now that I've finally gotten around to it, is this: How does the cpu determine the order of the players on the depth chart? How reliable is it? Is it a function of the coordinator's abilities? Thanks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
william1993 Posted February 20, 2017 Share Posted February 20, 2017 I think it's just overall grade. like the guy who is 3.5/5 is number 1, 3/4 number 2 2.5/4 number 3 and so on, regardless of instincts adn stuff Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arlie Rahn Posted February 20, 2017 Share Posted February 20, 2017 Yeah, the CPU balances all ratings and takes a best guess on who would be best. But, they don't always prioritize the right ratings your defense/role. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ragin Cajun Posted March 20, 2017 Share Posted March 20, 2017 There's nothing wrong with that but it also benefits you to delve deeper into the players to make any changes you feel are in your best interests...lol. I honestly use the AI alot and then will modify if there is someone that I feel is better, or try someone new if I see someone struggling. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.