Has anyone tested out how match setups are classified when it comes to products?

[awesomenessofme1]

<p>So there are these categories for match setups that are affected by products:</p><p> </p><p>

Steel cage</p><p>

Basic match setups</p><p>

High flying aids</p><p>

Dangerous match setups</p><p>

Ultra-dangerous match setups</p><p> </p><p>

Has anyone gone through and checked to see what qualifies as which type?</p>

[Bonafide_Bluffa]

i would also like to know this. mainly whats a "dangerous" and "ultra dangerous" set up

[awesomenessofme1]

I was going to test this out, but I've had my test cut short by a bug. In a bit, I'll try again.

[mharmon99]

That's a good question. I don't know. The kinds of companies I like to run don't really rely on those types of matches.

[DBarkavon]

<blockquote data-ipsquote="" class="ipsQuote" data-ipsquote-username="awesomenessofme1" data-cite="awesomenessofme1" data-ipsquote-contentapp="forums" data-ipsquote-contenttype="forums" data-ipsquote-contentid="48706" data-ipsquote-contentclass="forums_Topic"><div>So there are these categories for match setups that are affected by products:<p> </p><p> Steel cage</p><p> Basic match setups</p><p> High flying aids</p><p> Dangerous match setups</p><p> Ultra-dangerous match setups</p><p> </p><p> Has anyone gone through and checked to see what qualifies as which type?</p></div></blockquote><p> </p><p> To add to this, I've also seen the description that fans won't like matches that 'are too extreme', which seems vague, but I guess that's the point.</p>