Jump to content

Moe Hunter

Members
  • Posts

    2,045
  • Joined

Posts posted by Moe Hunter

  1. Excited for Rock Band 4, but I really wish I bought a PS3 back in the day rather than a 360. I'm going to lose so much DLC, as I have no desire to buy an XBOne.

     

    That said though, if you play with friends, none of them would have gained their own progress or achievements/trophies on PS3 as only one person can be logged in at once. 360 was by far the superior RB platform.

  2. <blockquote data-ipsquote="" class="ipsQuote" data-ipsquote-username="The Swanton825" data-cite="The Swanton825" data-ipsquote-contentapp="forums" data-ipsquote-contenttype="forums" data-ipsquote-contentid="25169" data-ipsquote-contentclass="forums_Topic"><div>You know, bringing Balor up to the main roster as the straight man to some stooge tag partner who keeps ignoring Finn's skill in the ring and instead, forces him into idiotic outfit after idiotic outfit until he finally snaps and beats the crap out of his partner wouldn't be the worst way to try and get him over with the "Universe". As long as they actually remember that the stupid costumes are a temporary thing and don't ruin him like they did with Sandow...</div></blockquote><p> </p><p> If by "ruined", you mean "more over than ever", then yeah, they totally ruined Sandow.</p>
  3. While I'd rather have seen Bryan win the Rumble, if they have him go over Reigns at Fast Lane, then that'll be two years in a row where the Royal Rumble has been undermined. If that's going to become the trend going forward, I'd rather they just got rid of the event, or else what's the point in winning it?

     

    In addition to the other examples (99, 06, 08), in 1997 neither the Royal Rumble Winner, the runner-up, or the guy who left RR as champion were in the Main Event / Title Match at Wrestlemania.

     

    Austin won, Bret was the would-be winner as Austin had been eliminated but refs didn't see it, and HBK won the championship that night. At WM, Austin vs Hart had nothing to do with the title or the ME, which was Sycho Sid vs Undertaker.

     

    Let's not act as if the Rumble is some sacred, unbroken, unbreakable promise. Del Rio vs Edge and Sheamus vs Bryan opening WM instead of Main Eventing is also going against the conventional way the RR works.

  4. I think the main problem with Reigns is that he HAD to win, creatively. I mean, the guy is going to be a star whether we like it or not (personally I like it, I really like it), and you can't be a 'star' without winning the title at some point.

    And that means he has to win the title in less than two and a half years of his debut, five months of which he spent injured? He hasn't even had a complete singles feud yet.

     

    Daniel Bryan winning the Rumble could 100% not happen. He had his Wrestlemania moment last year. He won the title at Wrestlemania for heaven's sake. He became the first guy in forever to win the title match at WM without being the current champion or that year's Rumble winner - hell, he didn't even have the MitB cash-in that year. I'm not saying he can't ever win the Rumble because he won the title at Wrestlemania, but the very next year would be pushing it. Wait until he NEEDS a bit of a boost.

     

    Having Bryan win the Rumble this year would've been stupid.

    No one's ever main evented two Wrestlemanias back to back, right? Why would they put the most popular guy on the roster in the top spot of their biggest show? That would be really stupid. They should push someone who's not talented or experienced enough for the role, and whom the fans aren't getting behind. That's "best for business".

  5. That being said, I would argue about whether or not Roman Reigns is that green. He has been around the business his entire life (being part of the Anoa'i family). To me, he doesn't botch moves that I've seen. Or it's a very rare thing if it does happen. He has the look. He's never going to do all the flippy moves that some wrestlers do. He's never going to be a spot monkey. He is what he is. He is a big man wrestler that uses power and power spots and that is enough to make me a fan of his.

     

    You seem to be pretty green yourself if you think that the quality of a wrestler is just what moves and spots they do.

     

    He can't put together a good singles match, certainly not at Main Event level. He doesn't have the experience or the psychology necessary. He also can barely cut a promo to save his life.

     

    It's easy to like Roman Reigns when he's in a multi-man match and just gets to come in and hit some Spears - he has a nice comeback sequence and generates some big moments. But the Main Event of Wrestlemania? That's gonna be a poor showing.

     

    Ziggler, Bryan, Rollins, Ambrose - any of those guys are hot enough right now to push, and are all far more capable than Reigns in every way. Cesaro could put on the match of century, but Vince can't stop crapping all over him.

  6. <blockquote data-ipsquote="" class="ipsQuote" data-ipsquote-username="BHK1978" data-cite="BHK1978" data-ipsquote-contentapp="forums" data-ipsquote-contenttype="forums" data-ipsquote-contentid="25169" data-ipsquote-contentclass="forums_Topic"><div>No WWE, I do not want to sign-up for your network. So quit sending me emails on a nearly daily basis. I can't help it if you are not hitting your projected numbers and the network is a flop.</div></blockquote><p> </p><p> Man, if only they had a "unsubscribe" button on those emails!</p>
  7. I thought it was a great listen. I used YouTube and went through bits and pieces of the Rumble to see if I could see what Punk was talking about, and it all seemed to check out. I didn't realize quite how banged up and rough he looked in that Rumble match, even at the start. Within 10 mins in to the match he is grimacing really hard. Reminded me of watching HBK and Stone Cold's WM match.

     

    Yeah, when I saw it live I noticed Kane being there well before he did anything, it was good to hear the story behind that. It's really quite sad that the company/business fosters this mentality of striving forward when you're injured, always going the extra mile, hoping to be recognised and rewarded for it, even if instead they give the glory to people who put in a lot less effort. Even after everything Punk had been through, even knowing the WM plans, even with how beaten up he was, with an undiagnosed staph infection and a concussion, he still maintained that he had to keep doing the job he was asked to do.

     

    I'm glad that he's managed to find happiness outside of that system.

  8. I mean I really don't know what else to tell you guys. He talked up Daniel Bryan all during Wrestlemania 30's build a bunch of times. I think that what milamber had originally meant when he said it. I really don't know what else to tell you guys other than that it all DID happen and it wasn't THAT long ago that this should even be an argument...

     

    Which is part of the problem first mentioned:

     

    "Why do the WWE feel the need to involve John Cena with every hot feud or upcoming star?"

     

    Cena had nothing to do with actually making Bryan popular. Leading up to Summerslam everyone already wanted him to go for the title, WWE chose to write it as "Cena picks his opponent, isn't he a nice guy for picking your favourite?" instead of having Bryan earn the shot.

     

    Then leading up to WM where Cena had nothing to do with the World Title scene, he still desperately tried to associate himself with the most popular wrestler at the time.

     

    There's a huge difference between verbally "putting over" and actually putting someone over in the ring (which yes, he did at Summerslam, that's a grand total of one).

     

    Now Cena's attaching himself to Ambrose, much as he has to Evan Bourne, Zack Ryder, and etc.

  9. <blockquote data-ipsquote="" class="ipsQuote" data-ipsquote-username="Teh_Showtime" data-cite="Teh_Showtime" data-ipsquote-contentapp="forums" data-ipsquote-contenttype="forums" data-ipsquote-contentid="25169" data-ipsquote-contentclass="forums_Topic"><div>I think he should always be on commentary but if he's a GM what else can he do? Do you really want to see him feuding with talent?</div></blockquote><p> </p><p> Never said he should feud with anyone. Just do something, anything beyond the laziest booking in the world with the least personality possible.</p>
  10. Man, I am psyched for Takeover 2. Very nice ending to this week's ME, with Zayn hitting those vicious Helluva kicks. Also, excited that it seems he'll be in WWE 2k15 (the making of video shows his Rolling Yoshi Tonic mocap data with his name in the files).

     

    I agree that Sasha Banks is fantastic - she's heavily gimmicked but in a way that I fully believe. I don't know what she's like IRL but it doesn't matter because she works that character incredibly well. ODB was essentially being herself in TNA, but drawing off a flask five times on the way to the ring was so incredibly lame.

     

    I've always loved Rebecca Knox (Becky Lynch), and I'm very glad they got rid of the stereotypical Irish BS, but making her act like Lita because of her hair colour isn't that much of a step up and seems forced. Hopefully they relax and she finds a more natural character to play. Maybe focus on her apparent love of puns as far as promos go.

×
×
  • Create New...