kesselll

I hope this is not mentioned anywhere in this topic as i searched forum a bit and found nothing. When I look at the wrestler I can seen the following on the right corner: Wrestler Toned Light Heavyweight Luchador 7 years of experience Based in Centro (Mexico) Ranked #340 in the world (here should be his personality type, but due to the fact that he is ranked, i cannot see it, hence question below) Is it a resolution? is it something i can find on any other screens (can i click somewhere and get to see his personality type?). Not interested in looking up in the editor Was this already asked and someone knows where? Thanks Sorted. I was looking at this in one of mods (1995) and some people just did not have any personality. When worker has no personality, in this place we can see his Power Rank

my english definitely could be better ... but: Queens (or Daughters)of Fire and Ice (or, North and South)? V.S.S (Valkyries of Sand and Snow), ? V.I.P Sisterhood (Viking - Intensity (or Intelligence) - Pharaoh)? N.E.G. (Norse and Egyptian Goddesses) even if the names sucks, maybe will push you towards something you did not think about

<blockquote data-ipsquote="" class="ipsQuote" data-ipsquote-username="Suplewich" data-cite="Suplewich" data-ipsquote-contentapp="forums" data-ipsquote-contenttype="forums" data-ipsquote-contentid="47434" data-ipsquote-contentclass="forums_Topic"><div>Oh that's an interesting idea. How could I potentially call my tag team titles?</div></blockquote><p> actually, that's why I left "etc" there as I had no idea hahah <img alt=":D" data-src="//content.invisioncic.com/g322608/emoticons/biggrin.png.929299b4c121f473b0026f3d6e74d189.png" src="<___base_url___>/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" /></p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> I retract that, but this is an complex idea, and probably a bad one.</p><p> There would not be Tag team Title as such, but ... aaa tag team title ... called, lets say Defenders of the Crown or something like that. </p><p> It's a title with storyline implemented as a default:</p><p> Whichever tam becomes DotC's, they <strong>must</strong> pledge their allegiance to the current King of the World. They have to make sure he don't loose his title, as if he does, they are stripped of the titles!</p><p> That's con, here's pro: DotC's can choose format of the match every time they defend their title, or need to be defeated twice, or anything else, or absolutely nothing, as they just get some extra money for being title champs</p><p> </p><p> It can lead to sudden turns, a lot of storylines, will require planning and such, but I see a strange potential for storylines here.</p>

<p>Hi mate, </p><p> </p><p> Not sure if it has something to do with me being old skull 'rassling fan, but i like 3 word company names, like WCW, WWF, JCP, TNA, etc, so for me the below is the best.</p><p> </p><p> Altought IRWA is not that bad to :] </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><blockquote data-ipsquote="" class="ipsQuote" data-ipsquote-username="Suplewich" data-cite="Suplewich" data-ipsquote-contentapp="forums" data-ipsquote-contenttype="forums" data-ipsquote-contentid="47434" data-ipsquote-contentclass="forums_Topic"><div>-<p> <strong><em>Royal Wrestling Alliance</em></strong></p><p> <em>RWA World Heavyweight Championship</em></p><p><em> RWA Pan-Pacific Heavyweight Championship</em></p><p><em> RWA World Junior Heavyweight Championship</em></p><p><em> RWA World Tag Team Championships</em></p><p><em> RWA World Openweight U-30 Championship</em></p><p> </p></div></blockquote><p> </p><p> </p><p> Or, with the "Royal" in the company name, just go with all the medieval names, something like:</p><p> RWA King of the World Title, </p><p> RWA Pan-Pacific Prince Title,</p><p> RWA X- Squire Title,</p><p> etc, <img alt=";)" data-src="//content.invisioncic.com/g322608/emoticons/wink.png.686f06e511ee1fbf6bdc7d82f6831e53.png" src="<___base_url___>/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" /></p>

Love this diary. Subscribed for weekly updates, checked the topic for any new posts 4 times in last 3 hours WCW World Heavyweight Championship Scott Steiner © vs Goldberg WCW United States Heavyweight Championship Kanyon © vs Booker T vs Mike Awesome WCW World Tag Team Championships Totally Buffed vs The Road Warriors WCW Cruiserweight Championship Chavo Guerrero © vs Billy Kidman vs Shane Helms vs AJ Styles vs Kaz Hayashi WCW World Television Championship Rick Steiner © vs Mark Jindrak Kevin Nash vs Diamond Dallas Page Lance Storm and Ric Flair vs Jeff Jarrett and Chyner Vampiro vs Rey Mysterio and Konnan Natural Born Thrillers vs Kronik

Great idea, and a great way to build feud for that. To avoid problems with face / heel, you can always double turn them. See Bret Hart vs Stone Cold

<p>Me too. </p><p> </p><p> Came back from work, and downloaded newest demo to see if this was implemented.</p><p> Sorry but "better" icon placement in Main Office is not enough.</p>

WMMA5 has received some good reviews, so i'd go for a download here. Should you be scared that it may be too complex for you, go for WMMA4. But then, price for both is the same, so should you like to buy it, you'd go for newer product, hence my vote goes for WMMA5. Tryi it, love it, or just try When it comes to TEW 2016 and TEW 2020. If you did not play the 16, I'd recommend to go for the newest. TEW2016 was part of a long process, years. New one is built from scratches, so in many areas will feel different from older one. Besides, you can install all demos and check

I will not buy it on the release day. Instead, I'll download trial, hoping that all UI changes plus others will make the trial look like official product, not beta. Then I'll try, then I'll judge, then I'll decide

cheers jhd1 and Capelli King - did not know about this.

<blockquote data-ipsquote="" class="ipsQuote" data-ipsquote-username="Dross" data-cite="Dross" data-ipsquote-contentapp="forums" data-ipsquote-contenttype="forums" data-ipsquote-contentid="48899" data-ipsquote-contentclass="forums_Topic"><div>This (posted by Slim Jim in the beta feedback thread) would be a good alternative:<p> </p><p> <img alt="T8NdEJG.jpg" data-src="https://i.imgur.com/T8NdEJG.jpg" src="<___base_url___>/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" /></p></div></blockquote><p> </p><p> same as above. It would be great :] <img alt=":D" data-src="//content.invisioncic.com/g322608/emoticons/biggrin.png.929299b4c121f473b0026f3d6e74d189.png" src="<___base_url___>/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" /></p>

or ... which probably would make it ever better, there could be a small button, allowing us to "ignore", "dismiss", "hide" etc, allowing us to choose not to see the worker who we don't want to see. That plus small button reseting our all dismisess on that screen.

TV size too small to give you any advantages / popularity gains?

Hey man, 1. I've read somewhere, that to make any improvement in charisma/mic /acting your angles would have to be at least 6 min long. Do not forget about it - very important. 2. Success or failure as far as i know would have no impact on the development, only their success in storyline, and sligthly improve or stop momentum. 3. Put the worker you want to improve to segments with someone he can lear from. I usually put the workers i want to improve to an angles with people much better "on-camera-skills", 6 minutes and let them learn. If you don't want to waste your best talker's time, or use him on poor rated segments, just contract someone who is either non wrestler or other kind of ringside worker, and let them have some angles togetgther. Let's pretend, that they are talking on each show about upcoming matches.... it'll work ... 6 minutes minimum ...

Owner, Creative team and ring announcers This is something that in my opinion was missing in TEW 2016 Owner vs Head Booker Playing as a Booker in TEW2016 is not hard and unpredictible enough in my opinion. While if you play as an owner it's all in your control and it's ok ... If you play as a booker i'd like to have more influencial owner. Me as a booker: - would not sign new workers, instead could only ask owner to sign them (with contract lenght and possible rooster push indicated on the same screen, but for owner to negotiate), - Same goes for the backstage / ringside staff, - would not negotiate PPV / TV coverage, deals etc, but could suggest expanding to new markets, - in fact, i'll skip all ideas i have in mind and just say, that all aside of booking shows would have to be negotiated with the owner, while it would be the boss who would have to agree and get the deals done. It was mentioned in some posts before: I'd love to have some sort of writers and or booking team. I.e.: just playing TEW 2016, 1996 mode and as WWF i have guy known as Vince Russo, who .... there is no point in him being in my company, so gets fired straight away as soon as he does something disturbing backstage. I know, i know we have a creative meeting screen but it's so automated. I can be alone in the newly found company with no other people and still get the best possible advice about best talents in the world - makes no sense for me. I could sign 20 wrestlers and get best advice as who is my best 5 workers etc. Creative team could be so much fun, they would like to push their favourites, and try to sink down guys they don't like etc. Ring Announcers: Same mod, same problem, Howard Finkel, he is not play by play comentator or colour, he is your typical announcer, and it would be great to show it in the game. Good announcer and / or famous celebrity could add something to the show, while poor one could lower crowd mood with uninteresting announcing.

i sometimes, just for sake of having more woman on the show, gather them all in one segment, where they are some kind of talking panel, and have 5-8 min, about 6 woman, that solves it.

<blockquote data-ipsquote="" class="ipsQuote" data-ipsquote-username="Fleisch" data-cite="Fleisch" data-ipsquote-contentapp="forums" data-ipsquote-contenttype="forums" data-ipsquote-contentid="41191" data-ipsquote-contentclass="forums_Topic"><div>From my 1992 game (in 1996)... So do we think Rocky was to blame?!<p> <img alt="Ow4pQhZ.jpg" data-src="https://i.imgur.com/Ow4pQhZ.jpg" src="<___base_url___>/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" /></p><p> </p><p> I just took over ECW after 4 years at my own promotion and noticed this when looking through the company.</p></div></blockquote><p> </p><p> Lorri must have fancied a bit of Peoples Champ strudel <img alt=":)" data-src="//content.invisioncic.com/g322608/emoticons/smile.png.142cfa0a1cd2925c0463c1d00f499df2.png" src="<___base_url___>/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" /></p>

<blockquote data-ipsquote="" class="ipsQuote" data-ipsquote-username="James Casey" data-cite="James Casey" data-ipsquote-contentapp="forums" data-ipsquote-contenttype="forums" data-ipsquote-contentid="41194" data-ipsquote-contentclass="forums_Topic"><div><p> Also, depending on money, switch to weekly shows as your workers' overness will quickly increase with exposure and you can quickly start getting the B show grade needed to (almost always) win regional battles.</p></div></blockquote><p> </p><p> based on my personal experience, i would suggest creatin 4 monthly events, as events bring more people, money, plus boost morale if achieve success</p>

I've noticed, that my developing workers tend to develop skills quicker when in batle royals than in single matches. did anyone noticed that as well?

<blockquote data-ipsquote="" class="ipsQuote" data-ipsquote-username="Defmall" data-cite="Defmall" data-ipsquote-contentapp="forums" data-ipsquote-contenttype="forums" data-ipsquote-contentid="41194" data-ipsquote-contentclass="forums_Topic"><div>Often I start my own Fed, or change jobs from 1 fed to another, only to realize that the Style was not REALLY what I was looking for. I guess I'm not clear on how to read the Company Stats to understand if a fed is based on Popularity vs Workrate. <p> </p><p> Can anyone advise a thread/resource where I can better understand how this works?</p><p> </p><p> (ex: if I am looking for a fed that is based on workrate - not popularity - but is not 100% opposed to storylines...how do I set/find those stats?)</p></div></blockquote><p> </p><p> In my opinion is the best for you would be to open the game, go to editor, create own company, and see the difrence between the product. If you need a bit od guidance, my WCW has:</p><p> Heavy on Traditional,</p><p> Key Feat on Mainstream</p><p> Medium on Modern</p><p> that gives storylines to follow, and rated equally on perf and pop</p><p> </p><p> if you add medium on Pure or Realism - you get more on perf, than pop</p>

straight after the worker announces his desire to retire. you'll get a notification in the box, and there is a chance to speak to the worker.

<p>it is not for TEW 2016, but may still give you a bit of help</p><p> below, link to the TEW 2010 help file</p><p> </p><p> <a href="http://cdn.akamai.steamstatic.com/steam/apps/344810/manuals/TEW2010Help.pdf?t=1426270220" rel="external nofollow">http://cdn.akamai.steamstatic.com/steam/apps/344810/manuals/TEW2010Help.pdf?t=1426270220</a></p>

I've read in this or other topic, that some users use Story Telling. This makes sense - as with that many wrestlers there is for sure some story to tell. Plus, with this on, with ring full of workers, diffrent styles, sometimes clashing, it may raise the overall fight/match rating. On another hand, if this would be your way to start a show, you could consider Work the Crowd, but i'm not convinced with this. You can always leave it as regular ...

<blockquote data-ipsquote="" class="ipsQuote" data-ipsquote-username="Leedz" data-cite="Leedz" data-ipsquote-contentapp="forums" data-ipsquote-contenttype="forums" data-ipsquote-contentid="41194" data-ipsquote-contentclass="forums_Topic"><div>I want a wrestler to be "managed" by both a bodyguard and a valet. If I set the valet to manage the wrestler and the bodyguard to manage the valet, will they all appear at ringside during his matches?</div></blockquote><p> </p><p> Worker can have only one manager at the time i believe.</p><p> Managers are usually mentioned in the segment and rated ( how well they worked in ringside)</p>

I think you could see the topic in Technical forum. Yes, this is a change for gains in popularity from Tiny and Very small Broadcasters, it is explained and introduced over there + you get a chance/hope that this may be overturned