K-Nection Posted November 11, 2015 Share Posted November 11, 2015 New Wrestling Promotion.... I kind of got this concept I been stewing over. I've been marathon watching Walking Dead and that's when the idea hit me. One of the things about Walking Dead that we like is we don't know how long the character will last. I think this can be translated into wrestling very well and I had an idea for a promotion. Darwin Wrestling Federation! It is the survival of the fittest and the stakes get the highest on the World Title Matches...Whomever loses these whether it be the defending champion or the challenger they are fired from the promotion. I think this will make all of the main event matches mean something because it means anyone can be gone at any time.....thoughts? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave_Scott Posted November 11, 2015 Share Posted November 11, 2015 It does sound cool, but you'd run out of guys REALLY quick Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
supershot Posted November 11, 2015 Share Posted November 11, 2015 It does sound cool, but you'd run out of guys REALLY quick Ya I think you would lose people that you have build up to fast. Another way could be if a wrestler acquires 5 losses they are out. Way more flexibility that way. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jaysin Posted November 11, 2015 Share Posted November 11, 2015 TNA has sort of done with twice. Madison Rayne only defended the Knockouts' Championship if people put their career on the line. Beer Money did the same with with the tag titles. It was fun both times, but it doesn't have long lasting appeal in my opinion. If anything it's something a promotion could do to refresh their roster, but not something that could happen on a consistent basis. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
K-Nection Posted November 11, 2015 Author Share Posted November 11, 2015 Well the Title Matches would only occur once in a while so you have time to build up your talent. Like a company that is Regional or higher only holds a World Title match at their big 4. A local company has the benefit of holding them closer together as it doesn't take as long to build the talent up. I'm kind of enjoying this idea because it always keeps your roster fresh and who is to say you couldn't hire them back? That lovable baby face that the heel champion screwed over comes back to a huge ovation after 6 months of being gone and rights the wrong of him getting screwed. It forces your hand to always be looking to freshing the roster because if you really pick up a guy you don't like...just stick him in a Title match!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CQI13 Posted November 11, 2015 Share Posted November 11, 2015 This could only be improved if you don't pick winners for the title matches. Also, what happens in case of a draw? or one of those finishes where they are both pinning each other and a ref gives each of them each of them a win. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
K-Nection Posted November 11, 2015 Author Share Posted November 11, 2015 This could only be improved if you don't pick winners for the title matches. Also, what happens in case of a draw? or one of those finishes where they are both pinning each other and a ref gives each of them each of them a win. Well I guess they would have to have a rematch....Last man standing sounds good or maybe a cage match....I think I really want to book this now! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
redhilleagle Posted November 11, 2015 Share Posted November 11, 2015 Good idea in theory, but how often were you looking at having these matches? Monthly? Quarterly, Yearly? I think once you fire someone it takes a few months for them to be willing to negotiate with you again. Maybe instead of being world title matches (as I always think that title should be on the line at least once a month), it could be for a different title, maybe not a title at all, but a tournament crown (Royal Rumble, KOTR, etc.) And maybe the loser doesn't have to be fired but "Demoted" to another brand or division. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
supershot Posted November 12, 2015 Share Posted November 12, 2015 Maybe instead of being world title matches (as I always think that title should be on the line at least once a month), it could be for a different title, maybe not a title at all, but a tournament crown (Royal Rumble, KOTR, etc.) And maybe the loser doesn't have to be fired but "Demoted" to another brand or division. Good ideas. I'm currently doing something with my midcard belt to fix the problem where once someone wins it they usually become Main Event level and are to over to drop it to a midcarder. So what I've done is once said person accumulates 6 title defenses they can choose to vacate the title for a world title match. Just another cool idea. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zero Posted November 12, 2015 Share Posted November 12, 2015 Have a tournament where the losers move on. The biggest loser is fired Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iruleall15 Posted November 12, 2015 Share Posted November 12, 2015 Id say a 3 losses would be perfect. Maybe even in a row so you arnt losing guys left and right Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Winter8905 Posted November 13, 2015 Share Posted November 13, 2015 What about if all the guys who have lost their title mach for your top title face each other in a multiman match or tournament at one PPV in the year. So many options depending on how many people lost their heavyweight title match.. could have it so that if you lose title match but end up winning a one later in the year then it saves you. Could have a money in the bank style match.. 6 men have to reach a contract at the top of a ladder.. the winner is safe and has to pick the guy who gets fired. That in itself could lead to a hot feud in a year time if you bring that guy back. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
K-Nection Posted November 14, 2015 Author Share Posted November 14, 2015 What about if all the guys who have lost their title mach for your top title face each other in a multiman match or tournament at one PPV in the year. So many options depending on how many people lost their heavyweight title match.. could have it so that if you lose title match but end up winning a one later in the year then it saves you. Could have a money in the bank style match.. 6 men have to reach a contract at the top of a ladder.. the winner is safe and has to pick the guy who gets fired. That in itself could lead to a hot feud in a year time if you bring that guy back. I like the ladder match concept...it sows the seeds for a slow burning off title feud....you have my gears turning on that note. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trev3454 Posted November 14, 2015 Share Posted November 14, 2015 What about if all the guys who have lost their title mach for your top title face each other in a multiman match or tournament at one PPV in the year. This is actually a pretty sweet idea. Makes each individual title match feel important while also sowing seeds throughout the year that someone that lost a title match is already gone and they just don't know it yet. I may have to steal this. I like the idea of someone losing 5 matches being out, as someone else stated earlier. It makes the successful performers look even stronger while giving the jobbers a threat to act against and raises even the lowest of stakes considerably. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
K-Nection Posted November 15, 2015 Author Share Posted November 15, 2015 This is actually a pretty sweet idea. Makes each individual title match feel important while also sowing seeds throughout the year that someone that lost a title match is already gone and they just don't know it yet. I may have to steal this. I like the idea of someone losing 5 matches being out, as someone else stated earlier. It makes the successful performers look even stronger while giving the jobbers a threat to act against and raises even the lowest of stakes considerably. Feel free to borrow it. I was bouncing this idea off of the board was thinking of making something like this down the road. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.