deimos_masque Posted March 7, 2007 Share Posted March 7, 2007 This is more based on opinion I know. In everyone's opinion how many wrestlers, teams, etc need to be dedicated to a specific title division to make that title viable? To me 6 wrestlers/teams seems enough with 8 being ideal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shamelessposer Posted March 7, 2007 Share Posted March 7, 2007 A simple way of figuring it out: If everyone in the division can say they're a former champion of said division, you need to bring in more people. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
deimos_masque Posted March 7, 2007 Author Share Posted March 7, 2007 *laughs* Yeah that does sound like a division needing some new blood. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Derek B Posted March 7, 2007 Share Posted March 7, 2007 There's no way to fault that logic. But it depends on the kind of division you want to run and your style of promotion. I was gonna ramble on about what I think would be a good number but it basically comes down to your own booking style and the number of titles you have. Fewer titles means more competition and bigger divisions. More titles and narrower styles for them means less competition and contenders. Thats why my women's divisions almost always fail. Too restricted on the number of people I'm willing to hire for it and I prefer to have competition. Meh. Derek B Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.