<blockquote data-ipsquote="" class="ipsQuote" data-ipsquote-username="ampulator" data-cite="ampulator" data-ipsquote-contentapp="forums" data-ipsquote-contenttype="forums" data-ipsquote-contentid="25169" data-ipsquote-contentclass="forums_Topic"><div>Again, you miss out on my point. Jobbing them out would be a way to hurt their popularity, as a way to keep them from going critical mass. But once they reached that point, jobbing them out wasn't going to work. You think I'm saying that them losing to others while actually losing no popularity is the issue. It isn't. <p> </p><p>
What we think of "yo-yo" pushes is really a way to control how popular a wrestler is. You've seen this Mark Henry. Last year, he was beating Randy Orton. This year, his jobbing out to Wade Barrett. It's way to make sure they don't get more popular than WWE think they should. </p><p> </p><p>
The other conclusion is that, instead of WWE being controlling, it's that they are incompetent. </p><p> </p><p>
So, in fact, the only other conclusion is the WWE has idiotically bungled Mark Henry's, R-Truth's, Jack Swagger's, Dolph Ziggler's, and a lot of other's pushes because they don't just don't know how to do it right. </p><p> </p><p>
Or they are intentionally doing it, or they aren't. If they are, they are being controlling. If they aren't, they are being incompetent. </p><p> </p><p>
I rather think they are just being over-controlling, rather than being utterly incompetent.</p></div></blockquote><p> </p><p>
Well if its a case of being controlling, why don't they bring 4/5 guys to the level of John Cena popularity, it would make them so much stronger as a company.</p>