BuddyGarner

<blockquote data-ipsquote="" class="ipsQuote" data-ipsquote-username="CPBHBK" data-cite="CPBHBK" data-ipsquote-contentapp="forums" data-ipsquote-contenttype="forums" data-ipsquote-contentid="34866" data-ipsquote-contentclass="forums_Topic"><div>Anyone interested in doing a two player Dynasty based in 1998?</div></blockquote><p> </p><p> What about MAW?</p>

The problem with Benoit is that he Kurt Angle and Eddie G. used a lot of the same psychology in their matches and had the whole rolling suplex variations. It's like seeing the same match three times a week.

I've been watching TNA for the past few weeks and my main problem is that there are way too many angles per matches and there hasn't been a real main event. This results in me fast forwarding through most of the angles cause I'm like isn't there going to be a match yet?

The WWE has not produced a product that entertains compared to regular TV shows which are way more popular. WWE doesn't know what they're doing compared to normal TV. Part of it is that live entertainment is usually more repetitive than scripted(how often does JR say the same thing during announcing? How often do Kurt Angle, Shawn Michaels, Chris Benoit, or Eddie Guerrero use the same spots when wrestling?). Who's Line is it Anyways is repetitive too. WWE doesn't compare favorably to sports. The announcers in MMA and Boxing tell it like it is in terms of the athletes involved plus their are less frequent events so their is less repetitive commentary. And, these sports usually have better psychology despite the occasional anti-climactic finish(which happens a lot in wreslting too). Plus, boxing and MMA have better storylines too.