danyp92

No, no matter who is involved after a determined lenght you get penalized, i don't remember exactly what number but there was a topic in the suggestion forum by MainOffender that covered it. EDIT: http://www.greydogsoftware.com/forum/showthread.php?t=545889 here it is. And my mistake it wasn't from Jaded but by MainOffender. Sorry!

I checked and only in a couple of products the requirement were altered because they were too harsh. I think all the products with this "expectation" should be less harsh.

Which patch are you on?

"No" means the "No New Members" option is off so they can take new members.

I voted "actual C-Verse character" but the truth is that half the time i play with avatars, Grand Avatar included, because like you said he's just there.

Sound really fun! Especially the 6 ZEN promotions Thank you!

I agree, but there is really no need of that user preference option when i can go in the editor and give me all the money i want. Still i think that if small companies must have the opportunity to own a network, there should be value in it. Being PPV focus on money, they should make the company money. Now is too powerfull (puting aside my preference here) and the way i can think for solving it are mainly 2: 1: Make the PPV network cost more than the other options (maybe making subscription the more cheapest). 2: Limiting the events on PPV that can be profitable on a determined period of time, maybe with only one event that will sell full potential and the second one only 50% and after that so low that it becomes not worthy. No idea how any of this will affect the balance of the game.

I'm not really bothered by it, but i only like to focus on the booking. If it stays like this i'll be happy. Still i understand the point made in this thread, but i still think that it should be somewhat a healty move to do a PPV broadcaster because that is what it's role in the game is, make money. For sure less, but if i (as a player ) don't get nothing from it, it becomes useless to do it unless your already big and at that point i don't need money probably or i can make it more easily using the broadcasters already in the game world. It may not be realistic, but i don't really want to deal with too much economy.

I'm glad That is one of the things that i really like about this perception system.

No, only by your company size and adjusted by momentum. Are you sure about styles?

And that none of the angles are rated on Overness or one of the others "passive" skills.

I've always played with crowd management (and Pefect Show Theory) off because the less i need to think about the better, but given i can't really use angles anymore to get an easy good rating i decided to try to turn on the option. This is only one show with a small company and i for sure need to use it more and with different companies, but my starting impression is that it's not as rigid as i thought and as you are describing it to be. At the beginning i was really unsure of waht to do, but before spending too much time in front of the screen without doing nothing i decided to book a show like i always book it (from a "creative" and "structural" point of view). The results was good, i got a better rating for the show and for some of the segments ( i run the same card without the option turned on) without the need to really overthink stuff. Like i said, i need to use it more, but maybe it's not as limiting i thought would be.

Another thing that you could do is add locations, but, you know, maybe as a last thing before release? It's not that important.

I don't really care one way or the other about products for the way i play the game, but i would really like the possibility to turn off penalties for lenght, in particular for angles.

Thanks! I'll use this when i start a save with EMLL, and thanks for giving me the name for my weekly event.

<blockquote data-ipsquote="" class="ipsQuote" data-ipsquote-username="KD637" data-cite="KD637" data-ipsquote-contentapp="forums" data-ipsquote-contenttype="forums" data-ipsquote-contentid="48754" data-ipsquote-contentclass="forums_Topic"><div>TEW2020 seems to be far more forgiving, $250k to start with and my average worker costing me a mere $30 a show. This includes guys I bring in from abroad (realistically my pay cheque will not cover their flight!) <p> </p></div></blockquote><p> </p><p> I started at 50'000, and that is because my avatar (The Great Avatar) had a reputation of 62. If you start at 0 you get $2500.</p>

I just saw the gimmick rating for the WWE roster and majority of them are awfull or great. I saw in the editor that they are set on random, maybe take look at them? Sorry if this is as much as a feedback i can give, i know pretty close to nothing on current day wrestling (not much in general) and even less about game balance. Still, thank you for this. EDIT: Some guys (always WWE) are set to be occasional wrestler or other roles but then they contract are for working only as Road Agents. Exemples I remember (Because by the time i noticed i already modified a loto of people roles): MVP, Sonjay Dutt, Jeff Jarrett. Natalya is set to be a manager for Tyson Kidd but he is a retired wrestler.

<blockquote data-ipsquote="" class="ipsQuote" data-ipsquote-username="sonofpaul" data-cite="sonofpaul" data-ipsquote-contentapp="forums" data-ipsquote-contenttype="forums" data-ipsquote-contentid="48713" data-ipsquote-contentclass="forums_Topic"><div>Ah! Thanks! The "Turn" button on the bottom of the pop-up when you click on the Works line of the character's status section.<p> </p><p> The downside is that it isn't very intuitive or easy to find. Why not just have it in the "Talks to Worker" section where the rest of your interactions are? </p><p> </p><p> I still feel that should ALWAYS approach you when they want to do a Face/Heel turn, or change a gimmick. They should meet with you upon signing and review their details for their character. McMahon (or Watts, Von Erich, Crockett, etc.) presumably never just let new workers arrive and start making these decisions without approval. It would add to the realism of the game if every signing met with you and stated, for example, I am planning on being a Babyface with an Adventurer gimmick, and you can accept or adjust it to your plans as the Owner/Creative. You could even have the worker get slightly unhappy or upset when you force such details onto them against their initial plan. Maybe have them argue some with you?</p></div></blockquote><p> Sorry but it never happened to me that workers turn or change they gimmick on their own. Like i said before, i don't think can happened at all and i can't think of anything that could be causing you this confusion.</p>

Maybe something to do with their gimmick or how you booked the match? Still strange and i guess annoying.

You can change their disposition without talking to them first and even if they told you that (and i guess it is because there is no text for this particular situation) you are able to change it anyway. Honestly, i don't understand how they can change anything on their own, i mean, i don't think is even possible. Can you explain further?

Thanks both of you for answering. Turns out that i didn't updated 7zip in... who knows... anyway now it works.

<blockquote data-ipsquote="" class="ipsQuote" data-ipsquote-username="gazwefc83" data-cite="gazwefc83" data-ipsquote-contentapp="forums" data-ipsquote-contenttype="forums" data-ipsquote-contentid="48694" data-ipsquote-contentclass="forums_Topic"><div>Why can't you extract the data?<p> </p><p> The link has expired for the pic pack it seems, I'll reupload now</p></div></blockquote><p> </p><p> It says to me that it can't be opened as an archive, but maybe the problem is on my end so...</p><p> </p><p> </p><blockquote data-ipsquote="" class="ipsQuote" data-ipsquote-username="GarthAlgar" data-cite="GarthAlgar" data-ipsquote-contentapp="forums" data-ipsquote-contenttype="forums" data-ipsquote-contentid="48694" data-ipsquote-contentclass="forums_Topic"><div>I don't have a problem extracting the data, but the link for the pictures does not look right, it seems the three dots "..." are not only in the text of lhe link, but in the link itself, too.</div></blockquote><p> </p><p> ... what did you use to extract it?</p>

<blockquote data-ipsquote="" class="ipsQuote" data-ipsquote-username="The Rock" data-cite="The Rock" data-ipsquote-contentapp="forums" data-ipsquote-contenttype="forums" data-ipsquote-contentid="47568" data-ipsquote-contentclass="forums_Topic"><div>Using Patch 9, playing as TCW, I noticed something weird:<p> when I go to the Show Report, it says "Attendance: unknown" and I´m also not getting any income from Ticket sales.</p><p> </p><p> I run a test as SWF and while it still says "Unknown", I did receive money for Ticket sales.</p><p> </p><p> I changed nothing in regards to Ticket Prices.</p><p> Am I doing something wrong or could this be a bug??</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> EDIT:</p><p> The Show Report for other Companies shows the Attendance number. It´s just my show that doesn´t.</p><p> </p><p> EDIT 2:</p><p> Just ran a second show with SWF and this time, just like with TCW, no income from Ticket sales.</p></div></blockquote><p> It should be fixed in the next patch.</p>

Can't download the Pic Pack. EDIT: I can't even extract the data from the rar.

<p>Seems to me, but i would need to check it better, that the Core product affect the match ratio and ratio between match and angle.</p><p> </p><p> EDIT: Nope, i was imagining things.</p>