Tha Black Phenom Posted January 30, 2010 Share Posted January 30, 2010 I wonder about this statement every show they keep dragging out the Piggy James segments. No, she isn't a size 0 so OMG SHE MUST BE FAT. I think its just a shame that they parade around a perfectly fine sized woman as fat, which could have some influence in effecting some younger girls in the crowd. Isn't that... part of the point in the storyline though? Unless I haven't followed it well. Bunch of heel girls acting like snobby b*****s and picking on another claiming to be 'fat', when really everyone sees she isn't really fat, it's just the girls taking the piss. So through that, Mickie advocates the "we are all women" schtick. I like the storyline. Some people saw the bowl-dumping segment angle last week as going 'too far' - IMO that's them getting complacent and being synonymous with WWE not going out of their cocoon as much. Edit: Mickie accepts herself as she is, her going to Anorexics Anonymous or anything of the sort would defeat the purpose of the angle... I think. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DaMegaFish Posted January 30, 2010 Share Posted January 30, 2010 If this had a decent ending, it might work itself out, but this is WWE and well, they don't get things worked out properly a lot of times. This being said, I don't always see Smackdown, and I'm sure I've probably missed a segment or two but have any other divas just told Mickie she's fine? It seems like every diva that I've seen get dragged in all just seem to go, "Yup, you're fat." Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
James Casey Posted January 30, 2010 Share Posted January 30, 2010 This being said, I don't always see Smackdown, and I'm sure I've probably missed a segment or two but have any other divas just told Mickie she's fine? It seems like every diva that I've seen get dragged in all just seem to go, "Yup, you're fat." Maria came out on Mickie's side last week, but as the face contingent on Smackdown right now is Mickie and Maria, and Maria's Apprentice contract apparently blocks her from appearing on other TV shows during it's run (or at least while she's in it) then she's going to vanish again soon. As for Mickie going to AA, well, this is WWE. Besides, if the heels get to her, she could go down that route in the storyline. Again, done sensitively, this could end up being WWE's very special episode on eating disorders. Done improperly it's 'Molly's got a big ass' all over again. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DaMegaFish Posted January 30, 2010 Share Posted January 30, 2010 .Done improperly it's 'Molly's got a big ass' all over again. Could be worse...could be Katie Vick. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wrestling Century Posted January 30, 2010 Share Posted January 30, 2010 Who do you guys think will win the Royal Rumble? I personally don't want HHH or Cena or HBK to win. I want someone who has never won the Rumble before to win. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Candyman Posted January 30, 2010 Share Posted January 30, 2010 Who do you guys think will win the Royal Rumble? I personally don't want HHH or Cena or HBK to win. I want someone who has never won the Rumble before to win. It'll be one of those three. Likely Cena. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stennick Posted January 30, 2010 Share Posted January 30, 2010 HHH wins who is Cena going to face at WM? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Shape Posted January 30, 2010 Share Posted January 30, 2010 The Animal, Batista. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jesterx7769 Posted January 30, 2010 Share Posted January 30, 2010 I think HBK will win the way they have been building up the SD storyline since he has beef with both Mysterio and Taker, so if WWE goes the obvious no twist route I think it has to be HBK but maybe they will throw a wrench in there and Punk or something win since he is gaining momentum with this cult (as much as i dont like it) The only thing that I dislike about the Rumble is how every year they make such a big deal about the big guys "oh my god how is Kane not going to win, hes so big!" and every year people just team up and throw the big guys over, so i kinda wish one of the big guys would win for once even though none of them are really being pushed right now Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
masterded Posted January 30, 2010 Share Posted January 30, 2010 I think HBK will win the way they have been building up the SD storyline since he has beef with both Mysterio and Taker, so if WWE goes the obvious no twist route I think it has to be HBK but maybe they will throw a wrench in there and Punk or something win since he is gaining momentum with this cult (as much as i dont like it) The only thing that I dislike about the Rumble is how every year they make such a big deal about the big guys "oh my god how is Kane not going to win, hes so big!" and every year people just team up and throw the big guys over, so i kinda wish one of the big guys would win for once even though none of them are really being pushed right now Didn't Undertaker win it a few years ago? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jesterx7769 Posted January 30, 2010 Share Posted January 30, 2010 While Takers big he's not a dangerous larger than life monster though, I'm talking about the guys who they push as indestructible monsters who should legitimately win, Big Show, Kane, Khali, Mark Henry, Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
masterded Posted January 30, 2010 Share Posted January 30, 2010 While Takers big he's not a dangerous larger than life monster though, I'm talking about the guys who they push as indestructible monsters who should legitimately win, Big Show, Kane, Khali, Mark Henry, A wrestling zombie who in every big match has a moment where he gets hit with a huge move which seems to kill him only to sit up and appear damage free isn't a dangerous larger then life monster? I do know what you are saying, though I think the only real difference is that Taker is built for life so they don't need to put him in domination matches to remind people that he is dangerous. Hmm, taking Taker out i guess the last one to do it would be Yokozuna, which was a long time ago. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PeterHilton Posted January 30, 2010 Share Posted January 30, 2010 I get what jester is saying: the guys like Khali, Show, Henry, etc...their size IS their gimmick. The reason they get hyped around this time is because of how big they are, not how over or popular they are (and that really does separate Taker from Kane, Show, Khali, etc because he's over regardless) So yeah, other than Taker, it's been ages since one of those 'giants' won. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moe Hunter Posted January 31, 2010 Share Posted January 31, 2010 Taker and Cena get gimmicks that make them out to not be as strong as their pushes. "How can Cena win this time?" turns out, pretty much the same way he won EVERY time they said that. Taker's never touted as "the" man to eliminate. I don't think there's ever been a time when people ganged up on him in the way they do to Big Show, Khali, etc. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wrestling Century Posted January 31, 2010 Share Posted January 31, 2010 I would really like Kane to win the Rumble and win the WWE Title from Sheamus at WM. Kane doesn't get the credit he deserves, and plus, I personally think that it would be a good match. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PeterHilton Posted January 31, 2010 Share Posted January 31, 2010 I would really like Kane to win the Rumble and win the WWE Title from Sheamus at WM. Kane doesn't get the credit he deserves, and plus, I personally think that it would be a good match. Yeah that's not happening And it would be a f'n awful match EDIT: I didn't want to sound rude, but KANE? In 2010? It's just sof ar from being realistic...and neither man is a good enough worker to carry a WM main event. An acceptable midcard braw? possibly. But Kane vs Sheamus to headline the biggest PPV of the year? I can hear the stock dropping. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Woodsmeister Posted January 31, 2010 Share Posted January 31, 2010 Cena is my pick to win it although I would rather Michaels win it out of the three obvious choices (Cena, Triple H and Michaels), I think they could be the last three aswell Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tag01 Posted January 31, 2010 Share Posted January 31, 2010 God is Sheamus really going to hold the title until WM? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MattitudeV2 Posted January 31, 2010 Share Posted January 31, 2010 I'm going to call it now Triple H to eliminate Shawn Michaels to win the Royal Rumble in the same place he won the 2002 Royal Rumble to take on the WWE Champion Sheamus. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ampulator Posted January 31, 2010 Share Posted January 31, 2010 Yeah that's not happening And it would be a f'n awful match EDIT: I didn't want to sound rude, but KANE? In 2010? It's just sof ar from being realistic...and neither man is a good enough worker to carry a WM main event. An acceptable midcard braw? possibly. But Kane vs Sheamus to headline the biggest PPV of the year? I can hear the stock dropping. I agree, but only half-way. Kane's one of those big workers, like Bam Bam Bigelow and Vader, who can put on pretty good matches with good workers without looking like they are being carried all the time. If Kane was to face, let's say, Chris Jericho or Shawn Michaels, it could and would be a great match. But against Sheamus? No. Kane might not need to be carried, but he can't carry anyone else. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sabataged Posted January 31, 2010 Share Posted January 31, 2010 I see Triple H winning, going on to challenge Sheamus. Then somehow at the February PPV HBK screws Undertaker out of his title, maybe to Jericho? Edge? Then we can get something like HBK vs Taker - Grudge rematch because Michaels wants it and Taker wants revenge HHH vs Sheamus - WWE Title Jericho vs Edge - World Title Batista vs Cena - Raw vs Smackdown Mysterio vs Punk - Cuz it sounds good McMahon vs Hart - Cuz Bret is back Kofi defeats 5 others to win MITB Orton is the real only wild card here. Being a top star in the company he has to have some sort of head liner match but all the big stars are tied up. I just don't see Orton vs Dibiase being that big of a match for wrestlemania. But the problem is I can not picture anyone else being at that level except maybe the Big Show but that doesn't make any sort of sense either. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Candyman Posted January 31, 2010 Share Posted January 31, 2010 HHH wins who is Cena going to face at WM? Yeah, that's why Cena is going to win. They're clearly setting up HHH vs. HBK at WM, or maybe even HHH & Vince vs. HBK & Bret. Cena will go after Sheamus. The only other possibility is Batista, I forgot about him. Cena or Batista. Either way, they're both going to face their respective brand's champion so it doesn't really matter who is standing at the end. Batista vs. Taker, Cena vs. Sheamus, HHH vs. HBK, Vince vs. Bret, Jericho vs. Edge, Orton vs. DiBiase...Punk wins MITB again? I could see it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Shape Posted January 31, 2010 Share Posted January 31, 2010 I just don't see sheamus holding the belt till Mania and with the way he's being pushed atm I'd rather he didn't. I kind of like the idea of him pulling out an amazing match with Trips out of nowhere but I just can't see it happening. At Mania I'm thinking Michaels-Taker (World Title on this or the match below, if they do the rematch I'd really like the belt involved) Jericho-Edge Cena-Batista-HHH (WWE Title, three men saves them building up a real storyline lol) Rey-Punk Orton-Ted maybe Vince-Bret MITB: kofi/morrison/christian/big show and others Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Woodsmeister Posted January 31, 2010 Share Posted January 31, 2010 http://www.gerweck.net/news/1264918610.shtml just read the wrestling observer said Cena would have been facing Sheamus tonight at the Rumble if he had not have hurt his back (he has bulging disks) so he will probably win the Rumble and then get injured by Sheamus so he can have treatment leading up the rematch at Mania. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
James Casey Posted January 31, 2010 Share Posted January 31, 2010 I'm going to call it now Triple H to eliminate Shawn Michaels to win the Royal Rumble in the same place he won the 2002 Royal Rumble to take on the WWE Champion Sheamus. Yeah, same here. I can see HHH/HBK at the next pay per view. Killing off DX could be hard for WWE, but they seem set for the occasional reunion/merch shilling spot regardless of what else they might be doing. As for the Mania card, something like this is how I imagine it: Jericho/Edge - possibly. If Edge is fit, this would be good. If not, why not Jericho/Christian? That would pave the way for an eventual feud between Jericho/Edge, with Christian caught between the two. Undertaker/Michaels - Almost certain, with Hart/McMahon in their corners. Sheamus/HHH - Yeah. This one might as well be advertised now. Legacy triple threat - Or possibly Orton/Dibiase, but Legacy are imploding slowly, and the only question is what Cody Rhodes gets out of it all. MITB - Kofi to win this. Can't see any other outcome. Would very much love for this match not to have Kane/Henry/Khali in, please WWE. Let the lightweights go nuts. Ideally, this'll be Kofi, Miz, Morrison, Mcintyre, Bourne, Tatsu and (why not?) the Hart Dynasty. As much as Shelton Benjamin and Matt Hardy excel in MITB, having a few new guys in there can't hurt. Diva match - Who can say? There may even be two. How about Gail/Maryse and Mickie/Beth/Michelle? Mysterio/Punk or Mysterio/Matt vs. Punk/Gallows - A bit of a stretch, but Mysterio is a third wheel in the main event scene on SmackDown, so who knows? Cena/Batista - Otherwise they're left off the big show Their only other match wasn't too bad, if memory serves, and it's been a while since that one, so why not? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.