Wrestling Century Posted March 16, 2010 Share Posted March 16, 2010 Modkill: Wrestling Century No, that belongs on the Mafia Game forum! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Astil Posted March 16, 2010 Share Posted March 16, 2010 No, that belongs on the Mafia Game forum! I'm practicing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zeel1 Posted March 16, 2010 Share Posted March 16, 2010 Modkill: Wrestling Century Wrestling Century is dead. He was Wailmer, Pokemon Aligned Sea Protector Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wrestling Century Posted March 16, 2010 Share Posted March 16, 2010 Wrestling Century is dead. He was Wailmer, Pokemon Aligned Sea Protector I burst out laughing right there! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stennick Posted March 16, 2010 Share Posted March 16, 2010 So I did not want a Wrestlemania rematch between Shawn and Taker I pretty much hate wrestlemania rematches I want to see original stuff but now I'm looking forward to it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jesterx7769 Posted March 16, 2010 Share Posted March 16, 2010 If you edit your post within a certain time that edited thing doesn't pop up, I do it all the time to correct spelling errors. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bigpapa42 Posted March 16, 2010 Share Posted March 16, 2010 So I did not want a Wrestlemania rematch between Shawn and Taker I pretty much hate wrestlemania rematches I want to see original stuff but now I'm looking forward to it. Yeah, I seriously disliked the idea when it was first looking like a possibility. Looks like a solid enough WM overall. Definitely better than last year, when I actually attended. Solid enough Raw tonight. If only they could have Stone Cold host every week. I expected Stunners all over the place, to be honest. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hyde Hill Posted March 16, 2010 Share Posted March 16, 2010 Pretty Good RAW but no stunner? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PeterHilton Posted March 16, 2010 Share Posted March 16, 2010 Pretty Good RAW but no stunner? My thoughts exactly. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jjohns44 Posted March 16, 2010 Share Posted March 16, 2010 So all the WM rematches of RAW involved interferences. Good call on Bret faking it whoever said it earlier. I had a feeling that was going to happen too, but was expecting it to be revealed right before the match was going to start at WM Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dragonmack Posted March 16, 2010 Share Posted March 16, 2010 Personally I'm waiting for Bret to reveal that he set up the whole 'broken leg' thing just to trick Vince into challenging him for the match at wrestlemania since he knew Vince would never agree to it if he thought Bret was 100%. I can imagine the look of shock on Vince's face at the start of the match when Bret calmly takes the cast off and shows he can walk normally. Man, did I ever call that one correctly!!! I love it when I can predict sports entertainment so accurately. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheOmniWarrior Posted March 16, 2010 Share Posted March 16, 2010 Is Kozlov a face or a heel? At end of ECW he was a face I think but last week on Raw he beat up Cena, and didnt show any hesitation like Mark Henry did. Or is Kozlov a tweener? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PeterHilton Posted March 16, 2010 Share Posted March 16, 2010 Is Kozlov a face or a heel? At end of ECW he was a face I think but last week on Raw he beat up Cena, and didnt show any hesitation like Mark Henry did. Or is Kozlov a tweener? I think they're betting on the fact that no one watched ECW and ignoring continuity. big angry russian = heel Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hyde Hill Posted March 16, 2010 Share Posted March 16, 2010 Or they just let us fill in the blanks. Floundering in ECW and got a chance to get in good with the boss -> heel turn. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MattitudeV2 Posted March 17, 2010 Share Posted March 17, 2010 I know this is off topic but I think RAW needs something, oh what is it....... .... .... .... GOT IT! ..... NO BLAND FACE CHARACTERS Kofi Kingston-Bland Evan Bourne-Bland Primo-Bland Yoshi Tatsu-Bland The Bellas-Bland Eve-Bland Gail Kim-Bland Kelly Kelly-Bland John Morrison-Bland Matt Hardy-Bland Tiffany-Bland GIVE ME A REASON TO CHEER FOR THESE PEOPLE PLEASE WWE! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jesterx7769 Posted March 17, 2010 Share Posted March 17, 2010 I think the whole bland comes from their product changes in the last years as now the gimmicks are so similiar (faces or heels) there are no "gimmicky" people. The only ones that really exist are old, Shamus and CM Punk seem to be the only unique people they've tried introducing in recent time. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tha Black Phenom Posted March 17, 2010 Share Posted March 17, 2010 No character diversification. Basically what I said before. They went from booking tag teams as mindless zombies to booking midcarders as mindless zombies as well. They deliver generic conversational lines backstage and the spotlight is mainly left to main-eventers, the unified tag team champions and.. /sigh guest hosts. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hyde Hill Posted March 17, 2010 Share Posted March 17, 2010 I think the whole bland comes from their product changes in the last years as now the gimmicks are so similiar (faces or heels) there are no "gimmicky" people. The only ones that really exist are old, Shamus and CM Punk seem to be the only unique people they've tried introducing in recent time. Even Sheamus is not that unique from a character standpoint just accent and look. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jesterx7769 Posted March 17, 2010 Share Posted March 17, 2010 Pretty bad then huh? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MattitudeV2 Posted March 17, 2010 Share Posted March 17, 2010 Pretty bad then huh? Yep, and I was watching RAW last night and the bleeped out half of Austin's lines so the whole point for Austin being there was to promote... Damage a movie that's going straight to DVD and not for nothing I could see more people buying that then watching Wrestlemania this year. Also look at that list again three of those guys are in the Money in the Bank ladder match and one in the Unified Tag Team Championship Match. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stennick Posted March 17, 2010 Share Posted March 17, 2010 I liked Yoshi's character in ECW. The Christian/Yoshi build up was good stuff. Evan, Primo, even Matt Hardy these guys are basically JBTTS at this point. So although its nice to have these guys have character thats just not the way the WWE works. Its not the attitude era where even lower card guys have gimmicks that shine through on t.v Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jesterx7769 Posted March 17, 2010 Share Posted March 17, 2010 I liked NXT, I haven't watched it the last two weeks. Wish it was two hours, we actually got three real matches on the show, *thumbs up* Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheOmniWarrior Posted March 17, 2010 Share Posted March 17, 2010 God... Danielson jobbing to Khali... KHALI! And Khali hasnt been on TV in a month, maybe more... and no excuse for Danielson this time. He is NXTs William Regal Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Shape Posted March 17, 2010 Share Posted March 17, 2010 God... Danielson jobbing to Khali... KHALI! And Khali hasnt been on TV in a month, maybe more... and no excuse for Danielson this time. He is NXTs William Regal lol he's still the focus of the show by a long shot. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tha Black Phenom Posted March 17, 2010 Share Posted March 17, 2010 As I said, Danielson's win is gonna be a big one. It might be hyped and whatnot, wouldn't put it past them if he were to win against Miz himself. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.