Questlove Posted May 31, 2020 Share Posted May 31, 2020 Something I've noticed in every single test I've done of my mod is that whenever you have a worker in multiple promotions that are all on Tiny broadcasters, the popularity gains stack ridiculously. Here are some examples, with numbers: Mance Warner who works for: - MLW (8-14k subscribers on Tiny Internet Subscription, 1-2k viewers on Internet Free-to-Air) - AAW (6-7k viewers on Tiny Internet Subscription) - AIW (7k viewers on Tiny Internet Subscription) - GCW (13k viewers on Tiny Internet Subscription) Eddie Kingston who works for: - NWA (9-15k viewers on Tiny Internet Free-to-Air) - EVOLVE (6-8k viewers on Tiny Internet Subscription) - AAW (6-7k viewers on Tiny Internet Subscription) Nick Gage who works for: - GCW (13k viewers on Tiny Internet Subscription) - AIW (7k viewers on Tiny Internet Subscription) Fred Yehi who works for: - ROH (30k viewers on Tiny Internet Subscription) - AAW (6-7k viewers on Tiny Internet Subscription) I think this should be altered so that popularity gain is scaled back based on the number of people watching. These guys have become ready to slot straight into WWE's midcard when they have almost no eyeballs on them, it makes no sense. Currently the only way I can see to fix this is to remove broadcasters like Pivotshare, IWTV etc from the data entirely. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DaneQuixote Posted May 31, 2020 Share Posted May 31, 2020 <blockquote data-ipsquote="" class="ipsQuote" data-ipsquote-username="Questlove" data-cite="Questlove" data-ipsquote-contentapp="forums" data-ipsquote-contenttype="forums" data-ipsquote-contentid="50395" data-ipsquote-contentclass="forums_Topic"><div>Something I've noticed in every single test I've done of my mod is that whenever you have a worker in multiple promotions that are all on Tiny broadcasters, the popularity gains stack ridiculously. Here are some examples, with numbers:<p> </p><p> <strong>Mance Warner</strong> who works for:</p><p> - MLW (8-14k subscribers on Tiny Internet Subscription, 1-2k viewers on Internet Free-to-Air)</p><p> - AAW (6-7k viewers on Tiny Internet Subscription)</p><p> - AIW (7k viewers on Tiny Internet Subscription)</p><p> - GCW (13k viewers on Tiny Internet Subscription)</p><p> </p><p> <img alt="QWAwgrZ.png" data-src="https://i.imgur.com/QWAwgrZ.png" src="<___base_url___>/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" /></p><p> </p><p> <strong>Eddie Kingston</strong> who works for:</p><p> - NWA (9-15k viewers on Tiny Internet Free-to-Air)</p><p> - EVOLVE (6-8k viewers on Tiny Internet Subscription)</p><p> - AAW (6-7k viewers on Tiny Internet Subscription)</p><p> </p><p> <img alt="ZQwKxgc.png" data-src="https://i.imgur.com/ZQwKxgc.png" src="<___base_url___>/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" /></p><p> </p><p> <strong>Nick Gage</strong> who works for:</p><p> - GCW (13k viewers on Tiny Internet Subscription)</p><p> - AIW (7k viewers on Tiny Internet Subscription)</p><p> </p><p> <img alt="oxaWHgQ.png" data-src="https://i.imgur.com/oxaWHgQ.png" src="<___base_url___>/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" /></p><p> </p><p> <strong>Fred Yehi</strong> who works for:</p><p> - ROH (30k viewers on Tiny Internet Subscription)</p><p> - AAW (6-7k viewers on Tiny Internet Subscription)</p><p> </p><p> <img alt="Xo12fth.png" data-src="https://i.imgur.com/Xo12fth.png" src="<___base_url___>/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" /></p><p> </p><p> I think this should be altered so that popularity gain is scaled back based on the number of people watching. These guys have become ready to slot straight into WWE's midcard when they have almost no eyeballs on them, it makes no sense. Currently the only way I can see to fix this is to remove broadcasters like Pivotshare, IWTV etc from the data entirely.</p></div></blockquote><p> </p><p> I've been exclusively running watcher games and have noticed this same thing. It's something I'd like to see addressed as well.</p> Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SirMichaelJordan Posted May 31, 2020 Share Posted May 31, 2020 Definitely agree with this Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
louis1016 Posted May 31, 2020 Share Posted May 31, 2020 This looks like it should be in the tech support forum as a bug instead of the suggestion forum. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Taker4455 Posted May 31, 2020 Share Posted May 31, 2020 This definitely looks like a bug. I can't imagine this is intended, anyway. I think you should post it in tech support. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Questlove Posted May 31, 2020 Author Share Posted May 31, 2020 I don't think it's a bug because it was the same in 2016. Pop gains have always been insane in TEW, they just seem slightly worse now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Self Posted May 31, 2020 Share Posted May 31, 2020 It's always been backwards. TV shows in major promotions get tiny popularity increases. Events in small promotions get huge increases. I think this should be altered so that popularity gain is scaled back based on the number of people watching. This. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.