D16NJD16

<blockquote data-ipsquote="" class="ipsQuote" data-ipsquote-username="HighDefOverDose" data-cite="HighDefOverDose" data-ipsquote-contentapp="forums" data-ipsquote-contenttype="forums" data-ipsquote-contentid="41967" data-ipsquote-contentclass="forums_Topic"><div>I'm not a Japanese wrestling buff by any means, but there being only 5 Japanese wrestlers yet to debut, it's a bit of an immersion killer, I noticed it when looking for Kota Ibushi, it means that if you have organic wrestlers turned off, which you probably would with a mod set in the past, that the japanese wrestling scene will become stale after a number of in game years.<p> </p><p> I have a list that i'm thinking of importing from fleischs real world mod of 150 workers (150 exactly, just counted, I have the list in a notepad document)</p></div></blockquote><p> </p><p> It would be easy I'm sure, to import a bunch of Japanese workers as "futures", but it seems Idolized is choosing quality over quantity here, that seems to be his modding style, and I for one welcome it. He doesn't watch Puro, so he naturally didn't create many Puro wrestlers.</p><p> </p><p> Since Idolized did say he is open to adding workers from a list, it might be best to suggest which mod would be best to import these Puro wrestlers from. Just a suggestion.</p>

<blockquote data-ipsquote="" class="ipsQuote" data-ipsquote-username="justtxyank" data-cite="justtxyank" data-ipsquote-contentapp="forums" data-ipsquote-contenttype="forums" data-ipsquote-contentid="41768" data-ipsquote-contentclass="forums_Topic"><div>It should work with those mods, but technically they are designed to be used with the Mod Squad's version of the pack known as MSP.</div></blockquote><p> </p><p> It works just fine with those mods</p>

<blockquote data-ipsquote="" class="ipsQuote" data-ipsquote-username="Jaysin" data-cite="Jaysin" data-ipsquote-contentapp="forums" data-ipsquote-contenttype="forums" data-ipsquote-contentid="41768" data-ipsquote-contentclass="forums_Topic"><div>Rising Storms, Clash of the Titans, War of the Worlds, and Matt Shannon's Risky Business.</div></blockquote><p> </p><p> I haven't found it to be incompatible with any retro mods ?</p>

Thanks so much not only for doing this but for continuing to update it

where is the dirty trick option within the game

Well, it had promise.

Can someone please make a company logo for Xtreme Fight Club (2000's era fictional promotion) I am not particular about it

Is there to make luchadors, X Division, or guys work with guys in their respective weight classes more often? Basically anything to improve AI booking is appreciated.

<blockquote data-ipsquote="" class="ipsQuote" data-ipsquote-username="Waters" data-cite="Waters" data-ipsquote-contentapp="forums" data-ipsquote-contenttype="forums" data-ipsquote-contentid="41967" data-ipsquote-contentclass="forums_Topic"><div> if Chris Benoit, or Chris Jericho, or Edge had made their way to TNA during its boom period in 04-06. <p> </p><p> </p></div></blockquote><p> </p><p> A boom period where the company never turned a profit. <img alt=":o" data-src="//content.invisioncic.com/g322608/emoticons/redface.png.900245280682ef18c5d82399a93c5827.png" src="<___base_url___>/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" /></p>

<blockquote data-ipsquote="" class="ipsQuote" data-ipsquote-username="d12345" data-cite="d12345" data-ipsquote-contentapp="forums" data-ipsquote-contenttype="forums" data-ipsquote-contentid="41194" data-ipsquote-contentclass="forums_Topic"><div>Take a look at the in game help section. It's all in there.<p> </p><p> Topic 39 of 46: Buy Rates and Viewers</p><p> Things that effect viewer levels: Popularity in each region where the show is reached on that network. whether the product is trending or not, final show rating, and the show's time slot.</p></div></blockquote><p> </p><p> Im aware of this info, and it does not explain what is happening. The More Popular, More Trending show is getting lower ratings than the other show in the same timeslot. Yes, the less popular promotions shows are slightly better 'rated'...but that equals a 2 million viewer increase over a more popular promotion? That can't be.</p>

<blockquote data-ipsquote="" class="ipsQuote" data-ipsquote-username="Jaded" data-cite="Jaded" data-ipsquote-contentapp="forums" data-ipsquote-contenttype="forums" data-ipsquote-contentid="41194" data-ipsquote-contentclass="forums_Topic"><div>What's the US overness of the top few guys in each fed?</div></blockquote><p> </p><p> As it was in 1997</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> WWF has </p><p> </p><p> 2 Icons</p><p> </p><p> 3 Huge Stars</p><p> </p><p> 5 Stars</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> WCW has </p><p> </p><p> 2 Icons</p><p> </p><p> 4 huge stars </p><p> </p><p> 7 Stars</p>

Can someone with a better understanding of this game answer or at least theorize for me Why in this scenario, the WWF would be getting a 14.3 average rating, while WCW would be averaging a 12.2 WWF USA Coverage - Big WWF Canada Coverage - Medium WCW USA Coverage - Very Big WCW Canada Coverage - Big WCW popularity 87 WWF - 80 WCW Momentum A WWF Momentum B- WWF Show Quality Average B+ WCW Show Quality Average B- Two million more viewers for WWF? Help!

I really miss the days of being to edit and view databases in excel. I think this was TEW 2008

<blockquote data-ipsquote="" class="ipsQuote" data-ipsquote-username="Loz_22" data-cite="Loz_22" data-ipsquote-contentapp="forums" data-ipsquote-contenttype="forums" data-ipsquote-contentid="41261" data-ipsquote-contentclass="forums_Topic"><div>How retro are you talking here? <p> </p><p> I'm currently working on a megapack as it were, with screens fitting each "era." I have folders of <strong>'85-'92</strong> // <strong>'93-'96</strong> // <strong>'97-'01</strong> // <strong>'02-'06</strong> // <strong>'07-'10</strong> // <strong>'11-'15</strong> // <strong>2016+</strong> </p><p> </p><p> Let me know what kind of time you're looking at and I'll work on a pack for you. </p><p> </p><p> Is there a limit to how many screens will work with a certain mod or can you just throw as many as you want in there?</p></div></blockquote><p> </p><p> That's actually exactly what I had in mind. Great idea I have no idea the answers to any of your questions, but I'd love an Attitude Era pack 97-01</p>

Has anyone put together a retro pack?

<blockquote data-ipsquote="" class="ipsQuote" data-ipsquote-username="Adam Ryland" data-cite="Adam Ryland" data-ipsquote-contentapp="forums" data-ipsquote-contenttype="forums" data-ipsquote-contentid="41194" data-ipsquote-contentclass="forums_Topic"><div>It is a ratio, but it's never been an even split.<p> </p><p> Usually it's (from ME to ET): 20%, 20%, 30%, 15%, 10%, 5%. This varies depending on the company size however.</p><p> </p><p> This maintains a 'shape' where around 60-70% of the roster are in midcard pushes and 20% are on top.</p><p> </p><p> The hard-capped system that some people want (i.e. "if you're at C+ popularity and it's a National company then you must be a midcarder) makes little sense and would not work as it has a massive flaw inherent in it - it could create stupidly imbalanced rosters. If you hire a 100 people and 1 had A grade popularity and the rest had C, that system would leave you with 1 main eventers and 99 midcarders. That's not only impractical, it doesn't even make any logical sense, which I hope is obvious from even a cursory look at it.</p></div></blockquote><p> </p><p> So it really just comes down to then, it shouldn't be 20% main eventers. I think otherwise the ratio makes sense. Whether its a 60+ wrestler promotion with 20+ main eventers, or a 30+ one with 10 main eventers, it just doesn't make sense. There should be a way to cap main eventers, or even just set pushes like we we're able to in the past.</p><p> </p><p> The ratio IS a MUCH better idea than a hard capped split, I dont know who would suggest otherwise.</p><p> </p><p> But does 20% main eventers really make for the most realistic split of a roster? I haven't found it does. </p><p> </p><p> I hope this doesn't seem like nitpicking, because it really does have a huge impact on the game---the pushes determines the entire shape and course of the CPU/AI booking.</p>

<blockquote data-ipsquote="" class="ipsQuote" data-ipsquote-username="Jaded" data-cite="Jaded" data-ipsquote-contentapp="forums" data-ipsquote-contenttype="forums" data-ipsquote-contentid="41194" data-ipsquote-contentclass="forums_Topic"><div>How big is their roster?</div></blockquote><p> </p><p> Massive, exactly how it was in 1997.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> But why should TEW shove 22 guys into the main event push, C- popularity guys up there with A+ popularity, when it could instead put them in mid card (20), lower midcard (15), Opener (9) etc. Just doesn't make any sense. No promotion in history pushes 20 main eventers. Well, maybe in the C-Verse.....</p><p> </p><p> Am I right in understanding that perhaps getting rid of the openers & enhancement talent (something that makes the data historically inaccurate) would maybe fix this?</p>

How do I stop WCW (International) from pushing 22 main eventers (?!), including Earl Robert Eaton and Brian Knobbs...(D+ and C- popularity)

Thrilled you are taking this to 2016 and expanding on the 2013 version

What can I do to stop CPU controlled promotions from making several TV deals with every country when I only want them set to have their show air on US TV?

<blockquote data-ipsquote="" class="ipsQuote" data-ipsquote-username="Hive" data-cite="Hive" data-ipsquote-contentapp="forums" data-ipsquote-contenttype="forums" data-ipsquote-contentid="37869" data-ipsquote-contentclass="forums_Topic"><div>Due to recent development, my 1994 and 1995 mods are <em>no longer</em> to be considered freeware. <p> </p><p> .</p></div></blockquote><p> </p><p> What happened Hivey?</p>

<blockquote data-ipsquote="" class="ipsQuote" data-ipsquote-username="Jaysin" data-cite="Jaysin" data-ipsquote-contentapp="forums" data-ipsquote-contenttype="forums" data-ipsquote-contentid="41194" data-ipsquote-contentclass="forums_Topic"><div>What mod are you using? The data is corrupt.</div></blockquote><p> </p><p> I forget, its a 199'7 one converted over to 2016. What does that mean the 'data is corrupt'. Ive never had any other issue with the data besides that. Will it cause other issues? Is there any fix?</p>

<p>-When i try to set WCW to being owned by Turner Broadcasting, I save it, and it sets it to CableVision. Ive tried this over and over.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> -Why is WWF Raw getting higher ratings 60.52 (?!) than WCW Nitro 45.44, when Nitro has more popularity, same size network, more momentum, equal quality shows?</p>

What is your base for this?

What would be the ideal setting for 1997-98 era ratings and buyrates? Or modern era REAL WORLD buyrates? Ie: National-Global - 3.5-4.5 range National-Global PPV - 0.7 to 1.7 range There were some speculating about ideal network sizes, as well as units. Edit/Delete Message