Jump to content

masterded

Members
  • Posts

    1,690
  • Joined

Posts posted by masterded

  1. Ok, You'll never believe what I just found out, Harry Smith, (Better known as David Hart Smith) CHOKED OUT a THIEF in AMSTERDAM! Yeah, you heard me correctly, DAVID HART SMITH choked the living crap out of a thief!...In Amsterdam!

     

    And i've got proof! http://www.wrestlingnewssource.com/news/34486/Former-WWE-Superstar-Choked-Out-a-Thief-In-Amsterdam/

     

    P.S: If I came off as a bit of a spammer in this, I apologize.

     

    That's been on the news sites for a day or so and there is nothing proving it actually happened.

     

    I'm not saying it didn't happen, but your link has zero proof.

     

    This one time Daivari choked a guy on the Minneapolis light rail then threw him off after the drunk tried to cause issue for other passengers and I actually have proof. :D

    http://youtu.be/_PzOCffcXNQ

  2. He would not move it. I was just saying that I think they should be moved to another market.

     

    I don't disagree :p I would love for Seattle to get a team back, and it's not like the people of LA would miss the Clippers too much... right? :D I mean, they HAVE the Lakers!

     

    Though I would love to see Seattle get a team again the Clippers will never move and when Sterling does sell (though it could be quite some time if he uses the courts to try and stop any NBA sanctions) it will go for a billion dollars easy. Why a billion dollars because it is in LA and the Bucks just sold for 550 million with a contractual agreement to not move the team (though if a new stadium isn't in construction by 2017 the same contract says the NBA will buy the team from the new owners). If a team in Milwaukee is worth $550 million than even the 2nd team in LA is worth an easy billion.

     

    How sad is it you finally get punished for being a horrible person and your reward is going to be turning a 12 million dollar investment into a billion dollar pay day?

  3. <blockquote data-ipsquote="" class="ipsQuote" data-ipsquote-username="moon_lit_tears" data-cite="moon_lit_tears" data-ipsquote-contentapp="forums" data-ipsquote-contenttype="forums" data-ipsquote-contentid="25169" data-ipsquote-contentclass="forums_Topic"><div>Poor Jake Roberts. Watching his H.O.F speech was depressing....</div></blockquote><p> </p><p> It made me hate wrestling fans. I mean there are times to shut your mouth and listen and too often people were either yelling stupid things or chanting/cheering at stupid times.</p>
  4. <blockquote data-ipsquote="" class="ipsQuote" data-ipsquote-username="milamber" data-cite="milamber" data-ipsquote-contentapp="forums" data-ipsquote-contenttype="forums" data-ipsquote-contentid="25169" data-ipsquote-contentclass="forums_Topic"><div>It would be a nice thank you to the fans. But at the same time it might overshadow Bryan's big moment if he does win. Personally I think Punk is done for good.</div></blockquote><p> </p><p> Yeah I would hate to have a Bryan win be due to interference it would lessen the impact of the victory. What I would like to see happen at Wrestlemania is Bryan make HHH tap in the first match and then wins with the knee in the second.</p>
  5. Oof, I hope that's just an actor talking. If there's one movie franchise I don't associate with Frank Miller-style "realism," it's the Fantastic Four. My biggest issue with those other FF movies (beyond the casting), is that they never do anything. I'd rather have a fun, action-heavy film with some character development than the Thing moping for an hour and nothing happening. I get that the Avengers can kind of cheat because all the character introduction stuff was already done, but I feel like even if you didn't see those other movies, you can pretty easily "get" who's who.

     

    I would vastly prefer the Fantastic Four just exploring the Negative Zone and fighting a weird bug alien in a robot suit for 2 hours over some "realistic" take on the characters.

     

    Here is the article I was talking about.

     

    http://www.ign.com/articles/2014/03/08/miles-teller-on-what-appealed-to-him-about-the-fantastic-four-reboot

  6. <blockquote data-ipsquote="" class="ipsQuote" data-ipsquote-username="Jaysin" data-cite="Jaysin" data-ipsquote-contentapp="forums" data-ipsquote-contenttype="forums" data-ipsquote-contentid="25823" data-ipsquote-contentclass="forums_Topic"><div>On the topic of Fantastic Four, I can honestly say I'm looking forward to what Michael B. Jordan does as Human Torch. Being white is not part of the character. It's not like they're casting a white guy as Black Panther. Him being black and Sue being white is easily explainable. They can be half siblings, step siblings or one can be adopted. He's such a talented actor that I think he's going to knock it out of the park.</div></blockquote><p> </p><p> I have little to no hope for FF. One of the actors recently talked about how it will be more grounded and they won't be wearing cheesy Halloween costumes. My instant reaction to his quote was that he was directly insulting comic book fans and how dumb can the studio be if that is true. I mean The Avengers and the other stand alone films shows that what we want isn't grounded comic book films without the costume we know and love. We want comic book films that look like comic books.</p>
  7. <blockquote data-ipsquote="" class="ipsQuote" data-ipsquote-username="Jaysin" data-cite="Jaysin" data-ipsquote-contentapp="forums" data-ipsquote-contenttype="forums" data-ipsquote-contentid="25823" data-ipsquote-contentclass="forums_Topic"><div>I'd be ok with more Bishop. Omar Sy, the guy playing the role at least looks the part. <p> </p><p> I'm more excited at the prospect of Mr Sinister. He's probably my favorite X-Villain. He's the only comic book character to ever genuinely creep me out. Well, he did when I was a kid and I was raised on horror movies. </p><p> </p><p> They could easily use DoFP time hopping crap mixed with AoA time issues to bring Cyclops back and rectify the age issues with him and Havok. At least I hope so. I'd like them to actually be the brothers they're supposed to be. </p><p> </p><p> There's also the possibility of adding Cable and X-Man. I'd prefer them to go all out and do an entire trilogy based on Age of Apocalypse, but I'm ok with them condensing the story if it's done right.</p></div></blockquote><p> </p><p> I would love to see Mr. Sinister, though like you said they need to bring Cyclops back. Sinister and his obsession with breeding the perfect Mutant by using the 2 most pure mutants (Cyclops and Jean) is such a big part of his character. If they make a Sinister who isn't obsessed with Cyclops than he isn't Sinister.</p><p> </p><p> The other big reason to bring back Cyclops is obviously Cable who I would think has to be a big part of any Apocalypse movie. If Apocalypse has a main foil it would have to be Cable. My biggest fear is they just keep making Wolverine an even bigger piece of all things X-men and make him Cable's father.</p><p> </p><p> Here is how I would hope X-men DoFP ends. Cyclops runs up to Xavier and the other surviving X-men with a baby in his arms and a red headed woman. Everyone is shocked how are you and Jean alive and so on. Cyclops says that isn't Jean and that the rest isn't important right now. He then asks Xavier to save his son who the camera now shows infected with the Techno-Organic Virus.</p>
  8. <blockquote data-ipsquote="" class="ipsQuote" data-ipsquote-username="delv213" data-cite="delv213" data-ipsquote-contentapp="forums" data-ipsquote-contenttype="forums" data-ipsquote-contentid="25823" data-ipsquote-contentclass="forums_Topic"><div>lazorbeak, lol. I find it more comforting that Batman is the only guy to be in two places at once in the entire DC Universe considering all his villains aren't trying to do anything besides harm Gotham, when the rest of the Marvel Universe is protecting the earth from total destruction on more then one occasion. I know Marvel introduced parallel universes to try and cover for their numerous plot holes, but still it's hard to follow.<p> </p><p> As for the Wolverine part, I always assumed Wolverine was part of the Avengers for a longer time because of his introduction through Hulk comics? My mistake, I was always clueless to these cross promoting schemes that Stan Lee came up with. Spider-Man was apart of the Avengers in the 90's though apparently, and Beast of all people was apart of the Avengers in the 1970's, which I find rather amusing. Anyways I don't want to discuss the small inacuracies of things that have little to no continuity. Since each team is usually apart of their own parallel universe.</p><p> </p><p> <a href="http://marvel.wikia.com/List_of_Avengers_members" rel="external nofollow">http://marvel.wikia.com/List_of_Avengers_members</a></p><p> </p><p> Regardless, I still find DC rather better when it comes to continuity all jokes aside. Just a preference.</p></div></blockquote><p> </p><p> Continuity for the major comic companies tends to be a joke. That is what ends ups happening when you have tons of characters tons of comics and characters either don't age or age extremely slowly. I mean DC has reset total continuity 3 times now. That being said in Marvel we have seen multiple time lines in which mutant prejudice has lead to mutant genocide and never one story about what the non-mutants did. Which goes hand in hand with normal heroes doing nothing about mutant prejudice at all in most x-men stories. Though recently marvel has been trying to better explain the relationship between mutants and other heroes going as far as suggest Captain America may be prejudice. Both have their issues and like you said it comes down to preference.</p><p> </p><p> Funny thing about Wolverine. He originally was going to be a wolverine who was turned in to a man. His big nemeses Sabertooth was originally just a serial killer and not a mutant at all. When the retcon him to be mutant and Wolverines rival the original idea was he was going to be his father (thought that got squashed before it ever happen).</p><p> </p><p> On the Rock in a DC movie note. I would rather have him be John Stewart than Cyborg.</p>
  9. <blockquote data-ipsquote="" class="ipsQuote" data-ipsquote-username="Stennick" data-cite="Stennick" data-ipsquote-contentapp="forums" data-ipsquote-contenttype="forums" data-ipsquote-contentid="25169" data-ipsquote-contentclass="forums_Topic"><div>Yeah I agree that and 98 WCW were staggeringly awesome as far as talent goes. <p> </p><p> 98 WCW you had Flair, Hogan, Roddy Piper, Bret Hart, Ultimate Warrior, The Outsiders, Sting, all of the cruiserweights, a hell of a tag team division. I remember a random Nitro that featured Hart/Hogan vs. Warrior/Sting which should have done monster business if the WCW wasn't in free fall by then. But yeah the most stacked rosters of all time are without a doubt </p><p> </p><p> WWF in the late 80's</p><p> WCW in 97/98 </p><p> WWF 2002</p></div></blockquote><p> </p><p> I don't know about WCW 98 the main eventers you named were past their primes as a in-ring performer. Sure a few of them were still able to perform at a high level (Bret and Sting), but for the most part the wrestling was the worst part of their performances. In 98 I think Nash was the only one who wasn't 40 yet and I think he was 39. </p><p> </p><p> On a somewhat related point. I was watching the main event of Bash at the Beach 94 Hogan vs. Flair on the network recently. The first thing I thought about is that they both looked so old at the time even though they were only 41 and 45. This was made funny with the way the announcers talked about how good they looked. The other thing that stood out was how boring the match was. It reminded me of how I never liked Ric Flair as a child. I think it all comes down to me starting to watch wresting in 1990 and by that point everyone of his matches seemed to be a paint by number affair that lacked any exiting moments or spots to look forward to. I have/had no problem with a paint by numbers match but I needed some type of moment to get exited for be it hulking up or a cool move and Flair just didn't have any.</p>
  10. What bothers me about Cena when it comes to face to face promos isn't what he says to people but how he reacts when other people are talking. It seems like he is just waiting for his turn to speak and doesn't care at all what the other people is saying. You go back and you watch promos with the Rock and Jericho and their reactions to what people said were great. It was either frustration, anger, annoyance, and yes at times fear. Did that stop them from tearing down the other person on the mic? Nope, but it sure made the other person seem more important, like what they said actually mattered and had weight. Someone compared him to the old DX promos and I think that is kind of fair in the way he kind of no sells the other persons promo. That being said their is a big difference seeing as Cena doesn't openly mock the other person as they talk and instead waits his turn to mock.
  11. <blockquote data-ipsquote="" class="ipsQuote" data-ipsquote-username="Smasher1311" data-cite="Smasher1311" data-ipsquote-contentapp="forums" data-ipsquote-contenttype="forums" data-ipsquote-contentid="25169" data-ipsquote-contentclass="forums_Topic"><div>Now i thought this...<p> </p><p> How about a WWE Network thread?</p></div></blockquote><p> </p><p> Would probably be seen as redundant and get closed. That being said I would like it. That way we can ask about recommendations and have a place to talk about issue with the service without cluttering this thread. I have always thought this thread works best as a place for reactions/discussions on the current product.</p>
  12. <blockquote data-ipsquote="" class="ipsQuote" data-ipsquote-username="Jaysin" data-cite="Jaysin" data-ipsquote-contentapp="forums" data-ipsquote-contenttype="forums" data-ipsquote-contentid="25169" data-ipsquote-contentclass="forums_Topic"><div>Didn't they advertise that the Monday Night Wars show was supposed to be on here? Can't find it anywhere.</div></blockquote><p> </p><p> Hasn't started yet, the only new shows that have anything is Countdown and Wrestlemania Rewind (each has one episode). I looked at the schedule for this week and haven't seen the Monday Night Wars show listed.</p>
  13. <blockquote data-ipsquote="" class="ipsQuote" data-ipsquote-username="D-Lyrium" data-cite="D-Lyrium" data-ipsquote-contentapp="forums" data-ipsquote-contenttype="forums" data-ipsquote-contentid="27929" data-ipsquote-contentclass="forums_Topic"><div>To be fair, though, a lot of late teens/early 20s Who fans (at least in Britain) are probably already familiar with him. It's not like they're throwing in a complete unknown. So IMO the age thing shouldn't be a problem.<p> </p><p> Plus, he's a stellar actor, so will quickly win the skeptics over IMO.</p></div></blockquote><p> </p><p> I don't know enough about British audiences so this may sound ignorant. After going on a British TV kick after getting into the new Dr. Who it seems British TV is a lot less interested in looks then American TV audiences. In fact I would almost say a lot of British TV seems to go for the real people look over the model look of American TV. Which does concern me about how well the new Dr will go over in America. I know so many girls who talk about how cute Smith is and a lot of them seem to feel that way about Tennant too. I could see having an older Dr. causing some American Female fans to leave.</p>
  14. So. Thoughts on Batista winning the rumble?

     

    I hate the idea of a guy who is only going to stick around a few months and has been gone for years winning the rumble. I would rather have him get eliminated by someone not in the rumble or someone he just eliminated from the rumble. That way you can use the guy who screwed him over as his Wrestlemania opponent (has the added bonus of Batista not being in a title match).

  15. I just watched a two minute clip of that Honey Boo Boo garbage...I know some people get into reality television and that's their own business, but how in the blue hell do over two million people tune into that show?

     

    This part isn't meant in a derogatory fashion, but is there something mentally wrong with that kid or is she just a spoiled little brat who thinks her poo doesn't stink? Or both?

     

    Something just seems...off about her.

     

    As someone who loves the Real World (early reality TV) I never understood the whole pageant thing and think all involved should be arrested and locked up for the good of humanity.

  16. Fringe an The Walking Dead are two of the series i most long to see this year. In a completely different note, NCIS is back in it's full glory. Love that show. It's surely not the first spin-off to last as much as an original show, or to eventually last longer, but it probably is the first one to do so while the original show (JAG) ran for 10 years. Don't remember any 10 year series producing longer or equal spin-offs, but if they do exist, then they are very few.

     

    The only one that I can think of is both Cheers and Frasier lasted 11 seasons each. That is 22 season of the character Fraiser Crane.

  17. So at the request of friends I just watched the Pilot of Grimm, can anyone tell me if this is worth watching the rest of or not?

     

    Also, I was at a friend of a friends house and seen an episode of a show that seemed quite interesting, but for the life of me I can't remember the name of the show. Maybe someone here can help.

     

    Pretty much it was about a boy (high schoolish?) who wound up working for the devil. The episode I seen he had to catch a baddie with a shop vac mini vacuum and take it to the DMV...now that's kinda ..... funny.

     

    The name of the show was Reaper. Netflix streams both seasons.

  18. I love the TV show Community, with Joel McHale from the Soup, especially any of the 3 paintball episodes they've had:

     

     

    Plus, this bloopers clip about Batman:

     

     

    IMO, the best comedy show on NBC... forget The Office, it annoys me.

     

    I would say second best comedy on NBC right behind Parks and Recreations. Though I love both the shows.

  19. I'm watching Avengers: Earth's Mightiest Heroes on Netflix. I had low hopes going into it, but its a really well done show with a good voice cast.

     

    I started watching it recently myself on Netflix and only have 2 problems with it so far. The horrible opening credit song and Tony Stark sounds like Jack Black which just throws me off.

×
×
  • Create New...