ColtCabana Posted March 27, 2010 Share Posted March 27, 2010 I could almost swear that I was watching Smackdown a few weeks ago and they mentioned that Punk/Rey would be a street fight. However, they haven't mentioned this since. I think it was if Rey beat Gallows, he didn't so now the stip is if Rey loses he will join the SES. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shawn michaels Posted March 27, 2010 Share Posted March 27, 2010 I've waffled. I want HBK to end the streak. I want it too. Bu sadly...i don't see it happening. Shawn is probably going to retire after mania (he teased at in a recent interview,dont remember where though,but i did read it somewhere) wich means there wouldn't be much sense in him winning...oh well...no champagne this year. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wrestling Century Posted March 27, 2010 Share Posted March 27, 2010 Does anybody know how you use a finishing/signature/special move on the No Mercy game for the N64? I can't figure out how. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tha Black Phenom Posted March 27, 2010 Share Posted March 27, 2010 I really hope HBK/Taker is the main-event, despite reports plotting for Cena/Batista to end the show. The fact is, no matter what the result of that match will be, we're gonna see something horrible happen... and something great at the same time. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Waghlon Posted March 27, 2010 Share Posted March 27, 2010 If Cena/Batista is the final match of the show ill cry. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Self Posted March 27, 2010 Share Posted March 27, 2010 Does anybody know how you use a finishing/signature/special move on the No Mercy game for the N64? I can't figure out how. One of the more random questions, but I think you Strong Grapple your opponent, then waggle the stick. Could be wrong though, it's been a few years. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slack Posted March 27, 2010 Share Posted March 27, 2010 HBK and Taker have already had a casket match. They don't need another one. A gimmick match would just seem too much. If they draw to a double count out, would they both retire? Taker would be 17-0-1. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xphen0m Posted March 27, 2010 Share Posted March 27, 2010 The only way for Taker or Michaels to win is by pinfall or submission. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
masterded Posted March 27, 2010 Share Posted March 27, 2010 HBK and Taker have already had a casket match. They don't need another one. A gimmick match would just seem too much. If they draw to a double count out, would they both retire? Taker would be 17-0-1. If it ended in a draw I think we would see a full blown riot. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tag01 Posted March 27, 2010 Share Posted March 27, 2010 I'd like to see HBK take it, but I think it makes more business sense to give it to taker, especially if HBK is on the way out. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rhudipoo Posted March 27, 2010 Share Posted March 27, 2010 Is the first part of the Hall of Fame airing on WWE.com as usual tonight? I've got a feeling it ain't, but I thought I would ask... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hyde Hill Posted March 28, 2010 Share Posted March 28, 2010 It isn't was reported by PWI and/or WO and the WWE itself. Need to buy the DVD for the full show. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tweek It Posted March 28, 2010 Share Posted March 28, 2010 The money falling from the rafters was crazy. I'm glad Ted finally got inducted.. bout damn time. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheOmniWarrior Posted March 28, 2010 Share Posted March 28, 2010 Wasting 15 minutes on Bob Oucler(sp?) was stupid. IMO they shouldve used that time for Inoki or Hart. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Candyman Posted March 28, 2010 Share Posted March 28, 2010 Wasting 15 minutes on Bob Oucler(sp?) was stupid. IMO they shouldve used that time for Inoki or Hart. I disagree completely. If you want Inoki or Hart on TV, Gorgeous George (more accurately, his wife) is the one that should've been bumped. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stennick Posted March 28, 2010 Share Posted March 28, 2010 Gorgeous George, his wife whoever bumped over Bob Uecker? I found his wife pretty damn entertaini thought Stu Hart was the "main event" entrant this year. I would have liked to see George, Ted and Stu as the three featured. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shmoe Posted March 28, 2010 Share Posted March 28, 2010 Anyway, who's watching Mania tonight and what're you most looking forward too? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheOmniWarrior Posted March 28, 2010 Share Posted March 28, 2010 Anyway, who's watching Mania tonight and what're you most looking forward too? Taker/Michaels 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Self Posted March 28, 2010 Share Posted March 28, 2010 Anyway, who's watching Mania tonight and what're you most looking forward too? MITB, Rey-Punk, Bret-Vince. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shmoe Posted March 28, 2010 Share Posted March 28, 2010 MITB, Rey-Punk, Bret-Vince. I'm pumped for Punk vs. Mysterio, I think that has huge potential. Bret/Vince of course, just for the inevitable. I think MITB has a strong line up (with the exceptions of the Scottish guy whose name I can't spell or care to remember and Swagger, who I don't like anyway. But in a ladder match? I hope he proves me wrong though.) I'm excited because none of these guys are particular front runners except perhaps Christian, so it makes some interesting situations for whoever wins. Also, I noticed on the the matches section for Wrestlemania, Taker vs. Michaels is at the top. Could this mean they close the show, because that would be awesome. Last year Trips vs. Orton fell pretty flat in comparison. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sebsplex Posted March 28, 2010 Share Posted March 28, 2010 Anyway, who's watching Mania tonight and what're you most looking forward too? Undecided at the moment, but I suspect I'll probably get it this year. I've dropped in and out of watching the WWE in the run up to Mania, but although not too many of the feuds have captured my imagination from a storyline point of view, the actual matches themselves stack up well. The main draw for me is probably the chance to see Bret back in the ring, even if the match almost certainly isn't going to be a wrestling classic. Then HBK vs Taker II as it pretty much guarantees a great match and the added stip of HBK's career being on the line should mean we get a match considerably different to last year's given the story behind it. Apart from those, Edge vs Jericho, Punk vs Rey and Money In The Bank stand out for me. Couldn't care less about Batista vs Cena ahead of time as (from what I've seen of it) the build up could have basically been plucked from any number of feuds involving Cena in the last 3-4 years. The match itself though, should be solid enough. Pass on HHH vs Sheamus, again don't really care to see it, although I'm sure it'll turn out to be a watchable match at least. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Shape Posted March 28, 2010 Share Posted March 28, 2010 You know, as far as ending Taker's streak goes, I've been thinking. Would it be such a bad thing to end it...for the sake of ending it? This match is one of the biggest in Mania history. There's no guarantee Taker's gonna be wrestling this time next year. And all the talk of using it to "put over a new young star"...well firstly I just don't see WWE doing it, because they have trouble trusting people, and giving them that rub would be like the point of no return. No, anyone who gets to end the streak will have to already be an established star. And there's nobody more established than Shawn Michaels. There will be no bigger match than this at Wrestlemania for a long time. The only match Taker has left that would be worth it on this scale is against John Cena. And on the basis that the streak will end, I would rather Michaels did it. It'd be an amazing Wrestlemania moment. And in a way...that's enough. It won't happen though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Candyman Posted March 28, 2010 Share Posted March 28, 2010 You know, as far as ending Taker's streak goes, I've been thinking. Would it be such a bad thing to end it...for the sake of ending it? This match is one of the biggest in Mania history. There's no guarantee Taker's gonna be wrestling this time next year. And all the talk of using it to "put over a new young star"...well firstly I just don't see WWE doing it, because they have trouble trusting people, and giving them that rub would be like the point of no return. No, anyone who gets to end the streak will have to already be an established star. And there's nobody more established than Shawn Michaels. There will be no bigger match than this at Wrestlemania for a long time. The only match Taker has left that would be worth it on this scale is against John Cena. And on the basis that the streak will end, I would rather Michaels did it. It'd be an amazing Wrestlemania moment. And in a way...that's enough. It won't happen though. I agree. I don't want to see some young guy that hasn't done anything for the WWE end it - just like I wouldn't want to see somebody like that retire Ric Flair. IF they're going to end Undertaker's streak, I think this is the time to do it. They could still have HBK retire, if that's what he wants to do. He could come out on Raw tomorrow night and say "I said that if I couldn't beat Undertaker at Wrestlemania, I have no career...and now that I have beaten Undertaker at Wrestlemania, my career is complete." and give his farewell speech. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Self Posted March 28, 2010 Share Posted March 28, 2010 I would hate that. For the streak to have truly meant something, its end should mean something. If Shawn wins, you'll get one big pop, a couple of weeks talking about it, then it'll be as meaningless as Jack Swagger's win streak. The only reason I'd give Shawn the streak is if he were turning heel off of it, completely changing the landscape of the WWE... but I hate the idea of heel Shawn too, so I'm pulling for an Undertaker win tonight. No prediction. Just hoping. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gabbo Posted March 28, 2010 Share Posted March 28, 2010 You know, as far as ending Taker's streak goes, I've been thinking. Would it be such a bad thing to end it...for the sake of ending it? This match is one of the biggest in Mania history. There's no guarantee Taker's gonna be wrestling this time next year. And all the talk of using it to "put over a new young star"...well firstly I just don't see WWE doing it, because they have trouble trusting people, and giving them that rub would be like the point of no return. No, anyone who gets to end the streak will have to already be an established star. And there's nobody more established than Shawn Michaels. There will be no bigger match than this at Wrestlemania for a long time. The only match Taker has left that would be worth it on this scale is against John Cena. And on the basis that the streak will end, I would rather Michaels did it. It'd be an amazing Wrestlemania moment. And in a way...that's enough. It won't happen though. It's sort of logical and I do agree the WWE and IWC are constantly worried about the future and who needs a push, whilst all parties need to concentrate on the here and now and treat every show as if its the last. That said, it's all Taker really has. Never really had a great title reign, no major records or numbers, he's only really had one proper feud in his career (Kane). Undertaker is the streak and I don't see it ever ending. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.