Jump to content

Small Questions Thread & "Living FAQ"


Recommended Posts

<blockquote data-ipsquote="" class="ipsQuote" data-ipsquote-username="soluuloi" data-cite="soluuloi" data-ipsquote-contentapp="forums" data-ipsquote-contenttype="forums" data-ipsquote-contentid="41194" data-ipsquote-contentclass="forums_Topic"><div>So if I let two brawlers fight in a brawl type match, will the match get bonus rating?</div></blockquote><p> </p><p> It depends on their stats, not their "style", if that's what you're asking. If they're good at brawling, then you do get a bonus.</p>
Link to comment
Share on other sites

<blockquote data-ipsquote="" class="ipsQuote" data-ipsquote-username="BrokenCycle" data-cite="BrokenCycle" data-ipsquote-contentapp="forums" data-ipsquote-contenttype="forums" data-ipsquote-contentid="41194" data-ipsquote-contentclass="forums_Topic"><div>It depends on their stats, not their "style", if that's what you're asking. If they're good at brawling, then you do get a bonus.</div></blockquote><p> </p><p> At what range does a brawler is considered good as brawling? The best ones I have are about 50-60 at most.</p><p> </p><p> Also, how do I choose right manager for my wrestlers? Should a manager handles more than one wrestler?</p>
Link to comment
Share on other sites

<p>I'm at that time to renew broadcasters. </p><p>

Im with TNA atm, securing good ratings, and earning 500k+ a month (healthy balance of 6m)</p><p>

My growth hasn't been as quick as I would like in the US.</p><p>

Am i better of going for a commercial deal (very big - huge coverage) or free to air deal (medium - tiny coverage)</p><p>

Basically the question is does the coverage or the type of service have the most significance on growth in an area?</p>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<blockquote data-ipsquote="" class="ipsQuote" data-ipsquote-username="DarK_RaideR" data-cite="DarK_RaideR" data-ipsquote-contentapp="forums" data-ipsquote-contenttype="forums" data-ipsquote-contentid="41194" data-ipsquote-contentclass="forums_Topic"><div>Also, I would expect hard drug (ab)use to take a heavier toll on someone's performance than soft drugs.</div></blockquote><p> </p><p> Yeah I can still get guys on soft drugs to have awesome matches, though the complaints from who they work with are about the same</p>
Link to comment
Share on other sites

<blockquote data-ipsquote="" class="ipsQuote" data-ipsquote-username="KillerHart" data-cite="KillerHart" data-ipsquote-contentapp="forums" data-ipsquote-contenttype="forums" data-ipsquote-contentid="41194" data-ipsquote-contentclass="forums_Topic"><div>I'm at that time to renew broadcasters. <p> Im with TNA atm, securing good ratings, and earning 500k+ a month (healthy balance of 6m)</p><p> My growth hasn't been as quick as I would like in the US.</p><p> Am i better of going for a commercial deal (very big - huge coverage) or free to air deal (medium - tiny coverage)</p><p> Basically the question is does the coverage or the type of service have the most significance on growth in an area?</p></div></blockquote><p> </p><p> The answer is... it depends.</p><p> </p><p> The most important things to look at are the show grades you will be required to get and the timeslot. Getting high levels of coverage won't matter if you are airing in the graveyard slot and still expected to get high show ratings just to keep the network happy. At the same time, being on a commercial network will earn you far more money than a free to air network would, while also giving you the chance to grow your own popularity and that of your workers far more quickly.</p><p> </p><p> So if I were you, I'd sign a relatively short TV deal with the larger company, but in a timeslot that you are confident you can always secure good enough show ratings for. If you make good progress there, you should see your ratings improve fairly quickly due to the increased level of popularity your workers will then have... at which point when re-negotiations come around you can then get a better time slot, safe in the knowledge that you can reach that target.</p><p> </p><p> Repeat until the WWE is toppled forever. <img alt=":)" data-src="//content.invisioncic.com/g322608/emoticons/smile.png.142cfa0a1cd2925c0463c1d00f499df2.png" src="<___base_url___>/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png"></p>
Link to comment
Share on other sites

While I know there aren't direct comparisons in terms of RW to CV, I'm still wondering which promotion would be the PWG of the CVerse. I'm tempted to say CZCW due to location and product... But I'm not entirely sure.

 


If you were to try to put together a PWG-esque Roster, who would you include? Who are the Indy Darlings of the CVerse?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

At what range does a brawler is considered good as brawling? The best ones I have are about 50-60 at most.

 

Also, how do I choose right manager for my wrestlers? Should a manager handles more than one wrestler?

A wrestler's style is usually -but not always- indicative of their stats. You can expect brawlers to have a good brawling style, puro style workers to have a good puroresu rating, entertainers to have strong mic and camera skills and so forth. This adds (or counterbalances, depending on your point of view) the Fog of War. Other than that, a wrestler's style is only there to help the AI decide hirings and firings.

 

Not sure what the minimum brawling is to take advantage of a brawl based match, but I think it has to be at least in the C range (over 55-60 at least).

 

As for managers, I've found out that pairing charismatic managers with less-than-charismatic wrestlers will result in the "manager did some good job at ringside" during matches. I'm guessing a manager with good charisma and mic skills can also help workers in angles.

 

Is there a way to improve a wrestlers behaviour? I got a great new wrestler from the school I set up, figurehead-type great, but he is such an assh*le to everyone that almost the entire roster has a problem with him.

As far as I know, you can't change that on purpose, but you can gradually change it by handling backstage incidents. Try to have a locker room leader or someone with high respect around, this might result in more "wrestlers' court" type situations where the incident is auto-resolved and almost never make someone's personality worse

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<p>Question for Adam mostly, or anyone else that might think they know.</p><p> </p><p>

The latest patch 1.53 (version II), one of the updated items says "Fixed an issue with attendances being incorrect" was this a common or uncommon problem? Will this affect my attendance at events? Currently I'm doing pretty good, but loosing or gaining a thousand people could make a huge difference with me financially currently (either for better or worse). Just curious about this fix with a little more detail. Thank you in advance.</p>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<blockquote data-ipsquote="" class="ipsQuote" data-ipsquote-username="DoubleA012" data-cite="DoubleA012" data-ipsquote-contentapp="forums" data-ipsquote-contenttype="forums" data-ipsquote-contentid="41194" data-ipsquote-contentclass="forums_Topic"><div>Question for Adam mostly, or anyone else that might think they know.<p> </p><p> The latest patch 1.53 (version II), one of the updated items says "Fixed an issue with attendances being incorrect" was this a common or uncommon problem? Will this affect my attendance at events? Currently I'm doing pretty good, but loosing or gaining a thousand people could make a huge difference with me financially currently (either for better or worse). Just curious about this fix with a little more detail. Thank you in advance.</p></div></blockquote><p> </p><p> Yes, you should upgrade. If you're using a patch older than 1.53 then your attendances are likely to be less than you should have been getting, and significantly so in some circumstances. There are only disadvantages to you to staying on an older patch.</p>
Link to comment
Share on other sites

<blockquote data-ipsquote="" class="ipsQuote" data-ipsquote-username="Adam Ryland" data-cite="Adam Ryland" data-ipsquote-contentapp="forums" data-ipsquote-contenttype="forums" data-ipsquote-contentid="41194" data-ipsquote-contentclass="forums_Topic"><div>Yes, you should upgrade. If you're using a patch older than 1.53 then your attendances are likely to be less than you should have been getting, and significantly so in some circumstances. There are only disadvantages to you to staying on an older patch.</div></blockquote><p> </p><p> Hey thanks for the response! I should of been more clear, I already had downloaded the newest patch (always do). Your explanation was just exactly what I was looking for. Much appreciated!</p>
Link to comment
Share on other sites

<blockquote data-ipsquote="" class="ipsQuote" data-ipsquote-username="BiffJordan" data-cite="BiffJordan" data-ipsquote-contentapp="forums" data-ipsquote-contenttype="forums" data-ipsquote-contentid="41194" data-ipsquote-contentclass="forums_Topic"><div>Does the Mayhem match aim always get "The crowd didn't like the overbooked nature of the match" note or is it because my product settings? I know it says it limits the match quality, is the road agent note the visual example of that?</div></blockquote><p> </p><p> You're getting that note because Mayhem automatically adds the Overbook note to matches. Overbooking won't go over well with any product that's not highly entertainment oriented, so yes, it's your product settings.</p>
Link to comment
Share on other sites

When you build a dojo, what sort of fighter does a "Shooters" focus produce? My product is Key Realism and Key Pure. It doesn't appear to have Puro workers as an option, and I'd be ok with Technicians, but Shooters might be better, unless they mean shooters for Hyper Realism, which I don't really do.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

<blockquote data-ipsquote="" class="ipsQuote" data-ipsquote-username="Teh_Showtime" data-cite="Teh_Showtime" data-ipsquote-contentapp="forums" data-ipsquote-contenttype="forums" data-ipsquote-contentid="41194" data-ipsquote-contentclass="forums_Topic"><div>Haven't been playing the game much from a booking side for a few months now (mostly mod stuff/watchers) so I never noticed, but the changes to the popularity floor mechanic seem huge.<p> </p><p> Felt nice to see a manager shoot up in overness without really having to cheese it</p></div></blockquote><p> </p><p> Agreed!</p>
Link to comment
Share on other sites

<p>Hi guys, tried to search for an issue similar to mine, but couldn't find anything similar.</p><p> </p><p>

So, i was creating a mod where there would be an alliance with companies from different continents. As I wanted to set continental titles I set an alliance with all of the companies (with a World Championship for all of them to work with) and then smaller alliances that only had the companies from the respective continents (so a North American alliance, an European alliance...) each with a shared championship. </p><p> </p><p>

I set it up so that none of the companies could have non-shared belts, but even then only the World Championship would get used by the AI, and the regional belts would stay untouched for years and years. Is this a limitation on alliances or could it have to do with Prestige or some other stat?</p>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<blockquote data-ipsquote="" class="ipsQuote" data-ipsquote-username="what7" data-cite="what7" data-ipsquote-contentapp="forums" data-ipsquote-contenttype="forums" data-ipsquote-contentid="41194" data-ipsquote-contentclass="forums_Topic"><div>Hi guys, tried to search for an issue similar to mine, but couldn't find anything similar.<p> </p><p> So, i was creating a mod where there would be an alliance with companies from different continents. As I wanted to set continental titles I set an alliance with all of the companies (with a World Championship for all of them to work with) and then smaller alliances that only had the companies from the respective continents (so a North American alliance, an European alliance...) each with a shared championship. </p><p> </p><p> I set it up so that none of the companies could have non-shared belts, but even then only the World Championship would get used by the AI, and the regional belts would stay untouched for years and years. Is this a limitation on alliances or could it have to do with Prestige or some other stat?</p></div></blockquote><p> </p><p> How were the titles set up? Gender restrictions, purpose (Youngsters, Hardcore, etc), did you have the defense setting to often for events? Are the titles of a different card level or the same?</p>
Link to comment
Share on other sites

<blockquote data-ipsquote="" class="ipsQuote" data-ipsquote-username="Teh_Showtime" data-cite="Teh_Showtime" data-ipsquote-contentapp="forums" data-ipsquote-contenttype="forums" data-ipsquote-contentid="41194" data-ipsquote-contentclass="forums_Topic"><div>How were the titles set up? Gender restrictions, purpose (Youngsters, Hardcore, etc), did you have the defense setting to often for events? Are the titles of a different card level or the same?</div></blockquote><p> </p><p> So here's an example of one of the regional belts:</p><p> </p><p> <img alt="b0361968186a9907cb5f3a726d4a9935.png" data-src="https://i.gyazo.com/b0361968186a9907cb5f3a726d4a9935.png" src="<___base_url___>/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" /></p><p> </p><p> owner by the smaller alliance:</p><p> </p><p> <img alt="48c85d1f17f18af56367a157a3bc8658.png" data-src="https://i.gyazo.com/48c85d1f17f18af56367a157a3bc8658.png" src="<___base_url___>/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" /></p><p> </p><p> and here's the "World Title" I mentioned:</p><p> </p><p> <img alt="4c789264a6e867b63c5790505fd83f8d.png" data-src="https://i.gyazo.com/4c789264a6e867b63c5790505fd83f8d.png" src="<___base_url___>/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" /></p><p> </p><p> "owner by" the larger alliance:</p><p> </p><p> <img alt="7172524282f20cab125c6449cd212117.png" data-src="https://i.gyazo.com/7172524282f20cab125c6449cd212117.png" src="<___base_url___>/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" /></p><p> </p><p> and now, over a year into a watcher save these are the defenses of one and the other:</p><p> </p><p> <img alt="4c74287cce5001453fcbe4ee59d1eb08.png" data-src="https://i.gyazo.com/4c74287cce5001453fcbe4ee59d1eb08.png" src="<___base_url___>/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" /></p><p> </p><p> <img alt="519ed5f85689b9eb8d4951374f60a7f0.png" data-src="https://i.gyazo.com/519ed5f85689b9eb8d4951374f60a7f0.png" src="<___base_url___>/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" /></p><p> </p><p> I've been playing with the settings for a while trying also to set the titles' level as floating, setting an initial champion, setting them as vacant, increasing the starting prestige, and I've had one of the watcher games run for three years but to no avail. The only luck I had was with one of the smaller alliances in which I added a third company that didn't belong to any other alliance, in which case there were title matches, but again, only for that third company.</p>
Link to comment
Share on other sites

<p>Unless I'm reading something wrong, the companies in the small (Canada) alliance are also in the worldwide alliance as well. This probably shouldn't be possible in the first place, but also might be why the title isn't being used.</p><p> </p><p>

They don't have to choose between two different titles in the same alliance, but between two different alliance titles. It could just be defaulting to the larger alliance since I presume it was entered first when modding the database. This would also explain why the 3rd company being added actually uses the title.</p>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Unless I'm reading something wrong, the companies in the small (Canada) alliance are also in the worldwide alliance as well. This probably shouldn't be possible in the first place, but also might be why the title isn't being used.

 

They don't have to choose between two different titles in the same alliance, but between two different alliance titles. It could just be defaulting to the larger alliance since I presume it was entered first when modding the database. This would also explain why the 3rd company being added actually uses the title.

 

Thanks. :)

So it seems like I really won't be able to setup multiple region specific titles for my WWE Alliance (if I put them in the larger Alliance I'll get the Mexican title being defended in Japan and so on). It's a shame you can't set a nationality limitation on a Championship. :(

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...