CQI13

<p>I didn't see the segment, but was the surprise more at that they would each have a GM under them?</p><p> </p><p> Also, if it wasn't Steph & Shane, people would be crapping over it "It makes no sense! The build up was for them to be the ones leading the brand extension."</p><p> </p><p> Hope we see Laurinitis on RAW, playing kiss ass to Steph and Teddy Long on Smackdown working with Shane.</p>

<blockquote data-ipsquote="" class="ipsQuote" data-ipsquote-username="mrwhippy" data-cite="mrwhippy" data-ipsquote-contentapp="forums" data-ipsquote-contenttype="forums" data-ipsquote-contentid="25170" data-ipsquote-contentclass="forums_Topic"><div>Why no #TheFinalDeletion talk?<p> </p><p> Fair play to them for trying something totally different. Certainly has got eyes on the brand again. Imagine if WWE came up with this idea (lol), their production team would have knocked it out of the park.</p><p> </p><p> Concept 10/10</p><p> Execution 4/10</p></div></blockquote><p> </p><p> There's talk they are taking some elements of that into the Wyatts/New Day feud.</p><p> </p><p> I will give them credit. Matt/Jeff has been (over)done already, so at least they were creative. From what I've read (haven't seen clips anywhere), it was a good set up for the match - no announcers, etc.</p>

<p>Any word on the tiered pricing they were thinking of for the Network? I think it was Triple H that had floated the question out for having the main shows (RAW and SD) added the following day for $3.00 more.</p><p> </p><p> I'm assuming they would leave the $9.99 alone (and you'd get the RAW/SD replays 4 weeks later) and for $12.99 you'd get RAW on Tuesday and SD on Wednesday.</p><p> </p><p> Would there be any traction for that?</p>

Odds that Cena remains on Raw, with Roman heading to SD after the Wellness violation?

You could run angles where he's a "Major Success" to balance out the losses. Maybe eventually he stops wrestling (well, on the main card, still give him wins in the pre-show). Just run your version of Sting angles, where he's watching stuff go down, and in his case chuckle and leave. Eventually, have something truly egregious happen that spurs him into action once again.

Love Ranallo's style - even with some of the goofy lines he was being fed in the Breezango/Golden Truth match it still maintained an air of importance.

I know there is a way to fix titles (so the AI won't create/retire belts). And I know only human players can have TV specials. But is there a way to have your child company set up like NXT - where they have TV and quarterly events? It would be with USPW, so I would give them a TV show on Reverie but would like to have them only hold 4 events in addition to weekly TV shows.

To test, sign him to a PPA contract. If it's not too bad, sign him to a written one.

<blockquote data-ipsquote="" class="ipsQuote" data-ipsquote-username="Newman" data-cite="Newman" data-ipsquote-contentapp="forums" data-ipsquote-contenttype="forums" data-ipsquote-contentid="41194" data-ipsquote-contentclass="forums_Topic"><div>So, I have my development company set to run weekly, monthly and annual events, 6 a month, currently a small fed. They are three hour events, which makes this card hard to fathom<p> </p><p> <a href="http://imgur.com/Z7LvX7Q" rel="external nofollow">http://imgur.com/Z7LvX7Q</a></p><p> </p><p> Four matches, and one angle in three hours??</p><p> </p><p> What am I doing wrong..</p></div></blockquote><p> </p><p> Does it only show major angles like 13?</p>

<p>At Small, are you better off trying to minimize the production penalties?</p><p> </p><p> It looks like financially, it's advisable to take the production hit early on - if that is indeed correct, what would be the ideal time to start investing in that?</p>

I saw a post detailing how Alicia Strong had moved from USPW to AAA, and had set the the steroids to 15% (making her eligible to be the promotion figurehead with the increased Star Quality and Sex Appeal. Rather than AAA, I was thinking of starting as a small promotion (Hard difficulty, I think). I am ok with using the starting pop for that, but what would the starting funds be? I can't see her starting a company with a $10k budget. **This would be an all women's promotion, or like Lucha Underground it would be integrated.

So how do you bring back defunct companies in a game? Do you have to set them to "random" (or even an actual date) before you start the game? It'd be fun to play with some of the older companies that have belts you can purchase - so you can continue the lineage if you wanted. Or to give Shane Sneer another shot at SCCW.

Apparently, the post didn't come through the first time: Is there a way to resurrect closed companies once you're already in the game? When I go to create it tells me there's already a company with that name in the database. Is there somewhere else I need to go first to bring one back (if possible)?

Haven't gotten through much, but I set up an alliance like that (QAW, CILL, AAA and my created fed) on day one. At their first show, AAA crowned the inaugural champ for the midcard title. Not sure if it makes a difference (don't think it would), but I just set it up as a trading alliance.

Going to try a created Women's promotion to later create an alliance with QAW, AAA and maybe one more. Who would be the best option for UC: -Peter Michaels -Jennifer Cornell -a good active worker (suggestions appreciated)

<p>Is there a way to see what events don't have a picture attached? (much like there was for workers in 13) </p><p> </p><p> -- sorry, don't have the game in front of me at the moment...</p>

So the spot with Enzo was legit? I thought it was just a story. Especially how they had the Zayn concussion storyline in NXT twice, with Corey Graves' retirement (for that very issue) in between.

Awful finish to that match. Charlotte is beyond boring to me.

Don't talk about the White Mamba that way! https://youtu.be/ZWewmINCXoY

Because I'm sure the workers would be glad to take less money - the company wouldn't keep the same compensation if there was less revenue coming in.

<p>Part of the reason is also the DVRing of shows so people can skip commercials. So now they have to have product placement - just like the Pre-Show presented by Mountain Dew or whatever junk they decide to drink. It hardly detracts from it, especially when the Social Outcasts are not presented in a way to be taken seriously. </p><p> </p><p> If you had someone like Lesnar plug something backstage (as opposed to on his trunks), there might be more of an outcry.</p>

'Blake Griffin doesn't represent what we stand for...' - yes, because KIA signed him as the face to their campaign because JJ Reddick was busy.

Given nonsensical booking in Rumbles, this is pretty funny: http://www.cagesideseats.com/2016/1/26/10836498/royal-rumble-2016-dumbest-ass-award-roman-reigns

And it is incredibly disingenuous of LeBron to say that he didn't know about the switch...like it wasn't his call or was consulted.

Missed opportunity with Bray. Lights should just have gone out throughout the match and leaving him as the only person in the ring. It works for cage matches and for the MITB match he wasn't even in...why not the Rumble?