<blockquote data-ipsquote="" class="ipsQuote" data-ipsquote-username="rvdjrv2002" data-cite="rvdjrv2002" data-ipsquote-contentapp="forums" data-ipsquote-contenttype="forums" data-ipsquote-contentid="26529" data-ipsquote-contentclass="forums_Topic"><div>I wouldnt say that entirely the team has showed signs of life since then the problem is as much a locker room issue as it is coaching, the team had already started to give up and I dont think its Campbells fault</div></blockquote><p> </p><p>
You are correct in that it is not all his fault. However, they took advantage of a soft schedule when he first came on, and came to a screeching halt when they started playing real teams. That is more than they were doing under Philbin so it was an improvement.</p><p> </p><p>
Ultimately, Campbell is not the man for the job. He is probably a few years away from that. </p><p> </p><p>
As for Tannehill, people soured on him pretty quick this year despite the improvement he had shown (especially last year). But unless they get someone in free agency, his contract dictates he will be here at least another year.</p>