jerlito Posted March 29, 2007 Share Posted March 29, 2007 what i have read is that this year's one night stand will be held somewhere else but here is the thing ecw won't be the only brand wreslting raw and smackdown will be wreslting to so what this mean is that ecw one night stand will be for all 3 brands. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SHaynes23 Posted March 29, 2007 Share Posted March 29, 2007 Yeah, it's probably smart because if they put the ECW that they have now into Hammerstein Ballroom, they would literally tear apart everything on the show. Those are the true ECW fans, and they would just be offended with the ECW that they were being offered now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PeterHilton Posted March 29, 2007 Share Posted March 29, 2007 ECW:ONS was amazing. The second ONS was actually very good, but didn't have the same emotional feel. And it bugged me that RVD didn't go over clean. Still, a really good PPV IMO. (Angle/Orton, Rey/Sabu were pretty hot) But I'd be vary wary of getting this PPV. The roster hasn't been involved in anything overly interesting. And none of the 'New Breed' seem capable of putting on an ECW type match. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
djthefunkchris Posted March 29, 2007 Share Posted March 29, 2007 They've stated that cross branding is going to become an ongoing thing. They will still have whichever brand the PPV belongs to as the main theme (ECW in this case), but all three brands will be making appearances in all the PPV's, reguardless of brands.... It's from a poll or some study group they come up with this idea. They say that the fans want to see all the Superstars (the really popular ones) on all the shows, so they are going to crossbrand for sure all the PPV's, and will be doing crossbranding as they feel is necessary on the three tv shows as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mystic Posted March 29, 2007 Share Posted March 29, 2007 [QUOTE=SHaynes23;217497]Yeah, it's probably smart because if they put the ECW that they have now into Hammerstein Ballroom, they would literally tear apart everything on the show. Those are the true ECW fans, and they would just be offended with the ECW that they were being offered now.[/QUOTE] I read on pwinsider a week or so ago that this is the exact reason why WWE moved ONS. I would have loved for them to keep it in the Hammerstein Ballroom just so I could hear the fans tear apart the show. [QUOTE=djthefunkchris;217530] It's from a poll or some study group they come up with this idea. They say that the fans want to see all the Superstars (the really popular ones) on all the shows, so they are going to crossbrand for sure all the PPV's, and will be doing crossbranding as they feel is necessary on the three tv shows as well.[/QUOTE] that is true.... at the smackdown house show I went to on campus back in jan., I can't tell you how many people, usually parents who bought tickets for their kids and friends were complaining that the raw stars were not there. (I heard more than one mother say that if she knew Cena was not going to be there, she would have not bought the tickets) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PeterHilton Posted March 29, 2007 Share Posted March 29, 2007 The only problem I see with the cross-branding for ECW that of the "really popular guys" in WWE, they have maybe 2 or 3. So the show is going to take a back seat on its own PPV. Hopefully, they'll be able to put aside this New Breed vs Originals thing and establish some storylines for individual workers by the time ONS comes around. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
djthefunkchris Posted March 29, 2007 Share Posted March 29, 2007 [QUOTE=PeterHilton;217538]The only problem I see with the cross-branding for ECW that of the "really popular guys" in WWE, they have maybe 2 or 3. So the show is going to take a back seat on its own PPV. Hopefully, they'll be able to put aside this New Breed vs Originals thing and establish some storylines for individual workers by the time ONS comes around.[/QUOTE] I aggree in a way, or it might be the exact way, who knows... lol. What I think it will be is just like you would book it. Lets say there is going to be six match's all together (probably double, but just for sake of simplicity). They would probably have ECW only for four of them, and two with the other brands being a part, or only... And the other brands having the more popular people will have to be the one's closer to the main event.... But ECW would still have to AT LEAST have one of their guys in the Main Event. Bassically, you could have two or three ECW only match's (example) to start off the show.. Then an ECW vs Raw vs Smackdown type match. AN All out Smackdown vs Smackdown, the Raw vs Raw singles match's, then the Main Event might be something like Lashley Vs. Kennedy... Just a thought. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jerlito Posted March 30, 2007 Author Share Posted March 30, 2007 yeah but without paul there this time will suck. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest loves2spooge Posted March 31, 2007 Share Posted March 31, 2007 why is it still called one night stand they should change the name to a trilogy of one night stands Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AfRoMaN36 Posted March 31, 2007 Share Posted March 31, 2007 I too dont understand why its called one night stand now.... I mean their have been 3 as of this year, and ECW is even back. They outta just call it "ECW Relationship" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jorge_JBR Posted March 31, 2007 Share Posted March 31, 2007 I think they are holding this year's One Night Stand in Jacksonville, FL where ECW and MLW both held a ton of shows. By the way, I understand the cool name, but now that we're coming up on the third ONE Night Stand, shouldn't they change the name? Especially since ECW is a full brand now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PeterHilton Posted March 31, 2007 Share Posted March 31, 2007 C'mon now....you guys are worried about semantics when this is Marketing 101. It's an established event name with a history (only two years, but still ) of getting good buy-rates. I don't see why they [I]should [/I]change it. It is possible to have a series of One Night Stands after all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AfRoMaN36 Posted April 1, 2007 Share Posted April 1, 2007 [QUOTE=PeterHilton;218695]C'mon now....you guys are worried about semantics when this is Marketing 101. It's an established event name with a history (only two years, but still ) of getting good buy-rates. I don't see why they [I]should [/I]change it. It is possible to have a series of One Night Stands after all.[/QUOTE] Then that would make ECW a whore. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jorge_JBR Posted April 1, 2007 Share Posted April 1, 2007 [QUOTE=AfRoMaN36;218763]Then that would make ECW a whore.[/QUOTE] Because the original ECW was so prude.:rolleyes: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jerlito Posted April 2, 2007 Author Share Posted April 2, 2007 well i got a question if you could name it anything else what would it be. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest The Aussie Posted April 2, 2007 Share Posted April 2, 2007 Perhaps ECW Anarchy Rulz (After one of their games) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jerlito Posted April 2, 2007 Author Share Posted April 2, 2007 cool i would call it since it has all 3 brands ecw:gang warfare the main event would see a battle royal every diva superstart champion in an extreme over the top wepons allowed battle royal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
flamebrain Posted April 4, 2007 Share Posted April 4, 2007 [QUOTE=jerlito;219086]well i got a question if you could name it anything else what would it be.[/QUOTE] ECW: Bleed You Dry Its got blood which is Xtreme!!1 and it also accurately reflects WWE's PPV strategy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shamelessposer Posted April 4, 2007 Share Posted April 4, 2007 [QUOTE=AfRoMaN36;218763]Then that would make ECW a whore.[/QUOTE] This is the only explanation for ECW on Sci-Fi. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jorge_JBR Posted April 4, 2007 Share Posted April 4, 2007 ECW: Three Times Now? I Hope It Doesn't Burn When I Pee. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jerlito Posted April 4, 2007 Author Share Posted April 4, 2007 [QUOTE=Jorge_JBR;220143]ECW: Three Times Now? I Hope It Doesn't Burn When I Pee.[/QUOTE] funny kinda like the name. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nevermore Posted April 4, 2007 Share Posted April 4, 2007 [QUOTE=The Aussie;219090]Perhaps ECW Anarchy Rulz (After one of their games)[/QUOTE] It was a PPV before it was a game ;). Quote The Raven Nevermore Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Remianen Posted April 4, 2007 Share Posted April 4, 2007 [QUOTE=AfRoMaN36;218763]Then that would make ECW a whore.[/QUOTE] No, that would make ECW a 'friend with benefits' or a booty call. ;) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AfRoMaN36 Posted April 4, 2007 Share Posted April 4, 2007 [QUOTE=shamelessposer;220073]This is the only explanation for ECW on Sci-Fi.[/QUOTE] Lol for that. [QUOTE=Remianen;220331]No, that would make ECW a 'friend with benefits' or a booty call. ;)[/QUOTE] Thats a shame too..... ECW would make a great steady relashionship... .... He has a car..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
takerlives77 Posted April 5, 2007 Share Posted April 5, 2007 I thought last year they were considering calling it ECW:Another Night Stand or something like that Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.