Jump to content

Official Random Screenshots Thread


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 3.4k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

<blockquote data-ipsquote="" class="ipsQuote" data-ipsquote-username="WhiteDD" data-cite="WhiteDD" data-ipsquote-contentapp="forums" data-ipsquote-contenttype="forums" data-ipsquote-contentid="41191" data-ipsquote-contentclass="forums_Topic"><div>I never tried playing this game, just accidentally opened the thread. But when I saw ho many different skills are there I think I'll definitely like it! Are there any manuals here?</div></blockquote><p> </p><p> The game has a reasonably comprehensive manual, and a lot of the attributes are wysiwyg. And of course, there's always the small questions thread for small (and larger) questions about the game.</p>
Link to comment
Share on other sites

<blockquote data-ipsquote="" class="ipsQuote" data-ipsquote-username="Teh_Showtime" data-cite="Teh_Showtime" data-ipsquote-contentapp="forums" data-ipsquote-contenttype="forums" data-ipsquote-contentid="41191" data-ipsquote-contentclass="forums_Topic"><div>They're randomly 6 million in debt. They fell to cult in June but didn't start releasing everyone until August. NOTBPW went out of business after a scandal took 8 million dollars from them, 21CW has had nothing I can find that would put them so far red.<p> </p><p> They're actually the #1 company in the rankings even still.</p></div></blockquote><p> </p><p> 21CW always goes under in TEW2016. They just dont make money</p>
Link to comment
Share on other sites

<blockquote data-ipsquote="" class="ipsQuote" data-ipsquote-username="iruleall15" data-cite="iruleall15" data-ipsquote-contentapp="forums" data-ipsquote-contenttype="forums" data-ipsquote-contentid="41191" data-ipsquote-contentclass="forums_Topic"><div>21CW always goes under in TEW2016. They just dont make money</div></blockquote><p> </p><p> 21CW have 54M in my game and the year is 2022. Don't think they'll be going under. So I guess this is wrong <img alt=":rolleyes:" data-src="//content.invisioncic.com/g322608/emoticons/rolleyes.png.4b097f4fbbe99ce5bcd5efbc1b773ed6.png" src="<___base_url___>/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" /></p>
Link to comment
Share on other sites

<blockquote data-ipsquote="" class="ipsQuote" data-ipsquote-username="Jon The GOAT" data-cite="Jon The GOAT" data-ipsquote-contentapp="forums" data-ipsquote-contenttype="forums" data-ipsquote-contentid="41191" data-ipsquote-contentclass="forums_Topic"><div>21CW have 54M in my game and the year is 2022. Don't think they'll be going under. So I guess this is wrong <img alt=":rolleyes:" data-src="//content.invisioncic.com/g322608/emoticons/rolleyes.png.4b097f4fbbe99ce5bcd5efbc1b773ed6.png" src="<___base_url___>/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" /></div></blockquote><p> </p><p> Amen to this, I'm in 2027 and 21CW has 137 million.</p>
Link to comment
Share on other sites

SE3N85C.png

 

The calling is strong.. Seriously, this happens in every WWE game I play.

 

H3zAFmV.png

 

I feel like I should've got better women for the relaunch of the women's division..

 

vYEnUdQ.png

 

..Dudes With Attitudes Tag Title Run? .. No.. no. Also, stop putting in good performances Nash, you're like 42 at this point and 3 years in time decline, I'd like to think HBK carried you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<blockquote data-ipsquote="" class="ipsQuote" data-ipsquote-username="Kiheiji" data-cite="Kiheiji" data-ipsquote-contentapp="forums" data-ipsquote-contenttype="forums" data-ipsquote-contentid="41191" data-ipsquote-contentclass="forums_Topic"><div>and also the most handsome</div></blockquote><p> </p><p> This is the only reason Bobby Eaton won so many tag titles.</p>
Link to comment
Share on other sites

<blockquote data-ipsquote="" class="ipsQuote" data-ipsquote-username="BigINMoldova" data-cite="BigINMoldova" data-ipsquote-contentapp="forums" data-ipsquote-contenttype="forums" data-ipsquote-contentid="41191" data-ipsquote-contentclass="forums_Topic"><div>I'm shocked Nash is doing that well in 2001 considering Nash is getting 68s in my '98 WFW. Which I think is way more accurate than Nash being even serviceable in 2002.<p> </p><p> I basically hide him in tag matches with Sting to keep him relevant.</p></div></blockquote><p> </p><p> Nash was always an interesting case. Not very good in the in-ring, he was big and charismatic enough, and eventually he got popular enough that his flaws didn't matter so much.</p>
Link to comment
Share on other sites

<blockquote data-ipsquote="" class="ipsQuote" data-ipsquote-username="BigINMoldova" data-cite="BigINMoldova" data-ipsquote-contentapp="forums" data-ipsquote-contenttype="forums" data-ipsquote-contentid="41191" data-ipsquote-contentclass="forums_Topic"><div>I'm shocked Nash is doing that well in 2001 considering Nash is getting 68s in my '98 WFW. Which I think is way more accurate than Nash being even serviceable in 2002.<p> </p><p> I basically hide him in tag matches with Sting to keep him relevant.</p></div></blockquote><p> </p><p> <img alt="hdObA8c.png" data-src="https://i.imgur.com/hdObA8c.png" src="<___base_url___>/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" /></p><p> </p><p> Also Nash is 2 years in decline, I think I manually set everyone to reach age relevancy or whatever it's called to 41, I think mostly cause I seen Hogan's was 41.</p><p> </p><p> <img alt="vRPoQZx.png" data-src="https://i.imgur.com/vRPoQZx.png" src="<___base_url___>/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" /></p><p> </p><p> If popularity counts for matches, then yeah, he shoots up fairly quick with his charisma.</p><p> </p><p> <img alt="U3PMaT1.png" data-src="https://i.imgur.com/U3PMaT1.png" src="<___base_url___>/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" /></p><p> </p><p> Hogan is only referenced for having the same ability to carry and do pretty damn great, he's been like 90 in match performances as well.. He's 7 years in decline..</p>
Link to comment
Share on other sites

<p>Its got to be those strong style side knees that big sexy throws <img alt=":p" data-src="//content.invisioncic.com/g322608/emoticons/tongue.png.ceb643b2956793497cef30b0e944be28.png" src="<___base_url___>/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" /> On a serious note he was always good at working his match and when he was over he could almost do no wrong. An over worker in a pop over performance fed can show up with a pulse and put on a MOTY candidate. </p><p> </p><p>

I have to point to Hogan vs. Rock as the easiest real life example. Neither guy did nothing in the match and that was highly regarded as both guy's top performances.</p><p> </p><p>

BTW how did all 4 guys score in the 90's and that match only rate as an 84? That is a crime in itself.</p>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<p>Hurakan has been with me since 2032, and has been my company's figure head most of that time. He has only ever lost one match, which was his second with the company. I put the title on him in his third match, after the previous champion was injured.</p><p> </p><p>

Initially, I hadn't planned such a long run, but I never found anyone worth taking the title off of him for. After he was settled in as figurehead, didn't make sense to have him drop the title, but I never really thought about the numbers. One night, I realized he'd just had his sixtieth defense, and decided to see if I could push him to one hundred. He's been slowing down in recent years, but as long as I keep his matches under fifteen minutes, he averages grades in the high eighties. Seven of his title defenses are in the company's top ten matches.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p>

<span>http://i63.tinypic.com/lktwj.png</span></p><p>

<span>http://i64.tinypic.com/106zqxi.png</span></p><p>

<span>http://i66.tinypic.com/2zji3nk.png</span></p>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<blockquote data-ipsquote="" class="ipsQuote" data-ipsquote-username="lavelleuk" data-cite="lavelleuk" data-ipsquote-contentapp="forums" data-ipsquote-contenttype="forums" data-ipsquote-contentid="41191" data-ipsquote-contentclass="forums_Topic"><div>Thought I would upload a few random profiles from my CornellVerse 2018 mod I am getting out (link is <a href="http://www.greydogsoftware.com/forum/showthread.php?p=2312411&posted=1#post2312411" rel="external nofollow">http://www.greydogsoftware.com/forum/showthread.php?p=2312411&posted=1#post2312411</a>) #cheap plug. <p> </p><p> Bit of promotion is never a bad thing lol</p><p> </p><p> <a href="http://s1193.photobucket.com/user/lavelleuk2000/media/Steven%20Parker.png.html" rel="external nofollow"><span>http://i1193.photobucket.com/albums/aa348/lavelleuk2000/Steven%20Parker.png</span></a></p><p> </p><p> <a href="http://s1193.photobucket.com/user/lavelleuk2000/media/Valiant.png.html" rel="external nofollow"><span>http://i1193.photobucket.com/albums/aa348/lavelleuk2000/Valiant.png</span></a></p><p> </p><p> <a href="http://s1193.photobucket.com/user/lavelleuk2000/media/Joanne.png.html" rel="external nofollow"><span>http://i1193.photobucket.com/albums/aa348/lavelleuk2000/Joanne.png</span></a></p><p> </p><p> <a href="http://s1193.photobucket.com/user/lavelleuk2000/media/Sam%20Keith.png.html" rel="external nofollow"><span>http://i1193.photobucket.com/albums/aa348/lavelleuk2000/Sam%20Keith.png</span></a></p><p> </p><p> <a href="http://s1193.photobucket.com/user/lavelleuk2000/media/Bart%20Ender.png.html" rel="external nofollow"><span>http://i1193.photobucket.com/albums/aa348/lavelleuk2000/Bart%20Ender.png</span></a></p></div></blockquote><p> </p><p> I've being looking at your mod, I wanna see Scotty Supreme's Profile.</p>
Link to comment
Share on other sites

<p><a href="http://s1193.photobucket.com/user/lavelleuk2000/media/scotty_1.png.html" rel="external nofollow"><span>http://i1193.photobucket.com/albums/aa348/lavelleuk2000/scotty_1.png</span></a></p><p> </p><p>

I edited SWF first and didn't realise that happens when you use all the text you can in bio's! They might be rewritten at some point!</p><p> </p><p>

*edit* Decided I didn't like the way that was written so redone it, still not perfect so maybe I need to go back and look at the early bio's that I did to see if they need improving now I'm a bit more used to it.</p>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<blockquote data-ipsquote="" class="ipsQuote" data-ipsquote-username="ink625" data-cite="ink625" data-ipsquote-contentapp="forums" data-ipsquote-contenttype="forums" data-ipsquote-contentid="41191" data-ipsquote-contentclass="forums_Topic"><div>Just got this on my first show with WCW in the Golden Age Mod.<p> </p><p> <img alt="ANfQiLO.jpg" data-src="https://i.imgur.com/ANfQiLO.jpg" src="<___base_url___>/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" /></p></div></blockquote><p> </p><p> That's what I disliked about the Golden Age mod. The first time I started playing a game with the mod, the Midnight Express had zero chemistry as a team. Considering they had been for a few years by that time, they should have had their chemistry pre-set as excellent. Yet, for some reason they felt the need to have CM Punk and John Cena's chemistry pre-set. </p><p> </p><p> Needless to say, I backed out of the save, went back and set up numerous chemistry notes in the database, then started up a new game.</p>
Link to comment
Share on other sites

<blockquote data-ipsquote="" class="ipsQuote" data-ipsquote-username="Temes1066" data-cite="Temes1066" data-ipsquote-contentapp="forums" data-ipsquote-contenttype="forums" data-ipsquote-contentid="41191" data-ipsquote-contentclass="forums_Topic"><div>I've being looking at your mod, I wanna see Scotty Supreme's Profile.</div></blockquote><p> </p><p> Right, last time. I have rewrote Big Smack Scott about 10 times until it felt right and it all fits in, here's his Big Smack Scott profile and his Scotty Supreme bio's. No more rewrites lol</p><p> </p><p> <a href="http://s1193.photobucket.com/user/lavelleuk2000/media/bss.png.html" rel="external nofollow"><span>http://i1193.photobucket.com/albums/aa348/lavelleuk2000/bss.png</span></a></p><p> </p><p> <a href="http://s1193.photobucket.com/user/lavelleuk2000/media/SS.png.html" rel="external nofollow"><span>http://i1193.photobucket.com/albums/aa348/lavelleuk2000/SS.png</span></a></p>
Link to comment
Share on other sites

<blockquote data-ipsquote="" class="ipsQuote" data-ipsquote-username="KingofOldSchool" data-cite="KingofOldSchool" data-ipsquote-contentapp="forums" data-ipsquote-contenttype="forums" data-ipsquote-contentid="41191" data-ipsquote-contentclass="forums_Topic"><div>That's what I disliked about the Golden Age mod. The first time I started playing a game with the mod, the Midnight Express had zero chemistry as a team. Considering they had been for a few years by that time, they should have had their chemistry pre-set as excellent. Yet, for some reason they felt the need to have CM Punk and John Cena's chemistry pre-set. <p> </p><p> Needless to say, I backed out of the save, went back and set up numerous chemistry notes in the database, then started up a new game.</p></div></blockquote><p> </p><p> I just checked the database and they have now added Eaton and Lane to the chemistry notes, but they're still missing a lot of teams that I really feel should have been included. Just a few examples off the top of my head:</p><p> </p><p> LOD </p><p> Arn Anderson/Tully Blanchard</p><p> Steve Williams/Terry Gordy</p><p> Dudley Boyz</p><p> The Rockers</p><p> Demolition</p><p> The New Age Outlaws</p><p> The British Bulldogs</p><p> Harlem Heat</p><p> Brothers of Destruction</p><p> All of the Freebird combinations</p><p> </p><p> Unfortunately, it also looks like Savage and Miss Elizabeth are the only wrestler/manager combo with a chemistry note. Seems like a fairly big oversight in my opinion. Then again, maybe they did it like that on purpose to add a little more randomness to the mod. Either way, I really enjoy the mod and greatly appreciate all of the time and effort they put into it!</p>
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Once tag team experience reaches a certain point, the experience overrides the chemistry bonus and it no longer adds anything. So for teams that are already experienced, it really shouldn't matter. And for several of the teams listed, they weren't really "chemistry teams". They were teams with two good workers who worked well together after they gained some experience. That's the experience bonus in play. Positive chemistry is when a team is better as a combo than their skills should allow them to be. I don't think that's really the case for teams like the Brothers of Destruction.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

<p>Not a bad debut year for Dolph Ziggler</p><p> </p><p>

<img alt="K7fiyt4.png" data-src="https://i.imgur.com/K7fiyt4.png" src="<___base_url___>/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" /></p><p> </p><p>

<img alt="9BXrvex.png" data-src="https://i.imgur.com/9BXrvex.png" src="<___base_url___>/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" /></p>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<blockquote data-ipsquote="" class="ipsQuote" data-ipsquote-username="Bigpapa42" data-cite="Bigpapa42" data-ipsquote-contentapp="forums" data-ipsquote-contenttype="forums" data-ipsquote-contentid="41191" data-ipsquote-contentclass="forums_Topic"><div>Once tag team experience reaches a certain point, the experience overrides the chemistry bonus and it no longer adds anything. So for teams that are already experienced, it really shouldn't matter. And for several of the teams listed, they weren't really "chemistry teams". They were teams with two good workers who worked well together after they gained some experience. That's the experience bonus in play. Positive chemistry is when a team is better as a combo than their skills should allow them to be. I don't think that's really the case for teams like the Brothers of Destruction.</div></blockquote><p> </p><p> Fair enough. However, if you go into the database of TGA and check the chemistry section you'll find that there are several entries that seem to have been included for the sole purpose of ensuring that certain workers don't have bad chemistry with each other, either as opponents or a team. That's more what I had in mind above. </p><p> </p><p> For example, Hulk Hogan/Andre The Giant, Ric Flair/Terry Funk, Ric Flair/Dusty Rhodes, Ric Flair/Harley Race, Barry Windham/Ric Flair, Saturo Sayama/Dynamite Kid and Kobayashi/Misawa all have their chemistry set to "Neutral" as opponents. While the Steiner brothers have their chemistry set to "Neutral" as a team. I think all of the teams I listed above should also have their chemistry set to at least Neutral so people can recreate common/popular teams in their saves without having to worry about being hit with an "awful" or "zero" chemistry note. Sure you could just ride a negative chemistry team out until their experience overrides it, but I think that's a poor alternative to just having popular/well known teams set to at least Neutral at the start of a mod.</p><p> </p><p> To me it kind of just goes back to what KingOfOldSchool said above about Cena/Punk. If they can take the time to go in and set Cena/Punk to having great chemistry as opponents, I think they should have at least set all the significant tag teams to having at least Neutral chemistry. I'm obviously not suggesting they should have taken it as far as adding teams like ShowMiz, Hogan & Edge, Regal and Tajiri or Booker T and Goldust, because you've got to draw the line somewhere or a real world mod would take forever. I think it could easily be universally agreed though that teams like LOD and the Dudley's are significant enough to warrant inclusion.</p>
Link to comment
Share on other sites

<blockquote data-ipsquote="" class="ipsQuote" data-ipsquote-username="Bigpapa42" data-cite="Bigpapa42" data-ipsquote-contentapp="forums" data-ipsquote-contenttype="forums" data-ipsquote-contentid="41191" data-ipsquote-contentclass="forums_Topic"><div>Once tag team experience reaches a certain point, the experience overrides the chemistry bonus and it no longer adds anything. So for teams that are already experienced, it really shouldn't matter. And for several of the teams listed, they weren't really "chemistry teams". They were teams with two good workers who worked well together after they gained some experience. That's the experience bonus in play. Positive chemistry is when a team is better as a combo than their skills should allow them to be. I don't think that's really the case for teams like the Brothers of Destruction.</div></blockquote><p> </p><p> That's actually incorrect. The experience doesn't overrride the bonus, it just negates the penalty for negative chemistry. I think the number is 40 Experience and it will cancel out any negative chemistry, you'll still see it in the dirt sheet but it makes it practically a non-factor in determining the grade of the match. You will always get a bonus if the workers have good chemistry. Also, chemistry doesn't grow with time, it's just a natural thing that occurs. Even if the Midnight Express have been together for years at this point, they could still have bad chemistry. But having so much experience makes it seem like they don't, like the fact that they have bad chemistry doesn't affect them because they've gotten to know each other over the years.</p>
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...