Jump to content

The Official TNA / Impact / GFW Discussion Thread


Adam Ryland

Recommended Posts

<p>The official Twitter account of WWL in mexico is reporting that former AAA Tag Team and Cruiserweight Champion Extreme Tiger has signed a deal with TNA Wrestling. He will work under the name Ultimate Tiger and be a new addition to the X Division. </p><p> </p><p>

I think it's a good signing, any thoughts?</p>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Another spoiler. Pretty sure it's January 9th's Impact.

 


*Magnus defeated AJ Styles in a No DQ Match to unify the TNA titles. The funny thing is that by the time this airs in January, WWE will have done the same angle and it will look like TNA was playing off of TLC! There were a ton of run-ins from Sting, Carter, Bad Influence and others and an angle where Earl Hebner walked off because he didn't want to screw AJ after he had been worked over. Sting got involved and the second ref, Brian Hebner got bumped. AJ Styles hit the Styles Clash but with no referee, Earl Hebner ran out, only to be pulled out of the ring by Kazarian and Daniels. Bobby Roode hit the ring and destroyed Styles with his finisher over and over. Dixie Carter brought another referee out and all the heels attacked Sting to keep him from helping AJ. Magnus pinned him.

 


After the match and this may have been for just the fans here, Styles thanked the fans and said that this place was his home. He said that wherever he goes or whether he stays, the fans here are a part of him and he killed himself for TNA and the fans. He said that storyline or not, Dixie can forget about him, but he'll never forget about the fans. He thanked everyone for giving him the blessing of being able to wrestle and had a long farewell.


Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
<blockquote data-ipsquote="" class="ipsQuote" data-ipsquote-username="Kimberly" data-cite="Kimberly" data-ipsquote-contentapp="forums" data-ipsquote-contenttype="forums" data-ipsquote-contentid="25170" data-ipsquote-contentclass="forums_Topic"><div>Jeff Jarrett posted the following on Twitter today: "On December 22nd, 2013 I officially resigned from TNA Entertainment. Thanks to everyone involved for all the fantastic memories! #grateful"</div></blockquote><p> </p><p> I wonder if this is legit or not. It very well could be but part of me thinks that it is part of a greater storyline.</p><p> </p><p> My reason for saying so is...<span style="color:#FFFFFF;">I read that Jeff Hardy is being written out of the company for a few weeks while TNA does a tour of England (I am not sure if it is Europe as well) and the reason is because he still cannot leave the United States. </span></p><p><span style="color:#FFFFFF;"> </span></p><p><span style="color:#FFFFFF;"> So I am thinking that what they could be possibly setting us up for is AJ Styles (Who may or may not have signed a new contract depending on what source you read), Jeff Jarrett, and Jeff Hardy vs. Dixie and her allies. It could be old school (I hate that term) TNA vs. Dixie's new school TNA.</span> Either that or he could really just be leaving the company and I could be wrong.<img alt=":D" data-src="//content.invisioncic.com/g322608/emoticons/biggrin.png.929299b4c121f473b0026f3d6e74d189.png" src="<___base_url___>/applications/core/interface/js/spacer.png" /></p>
Link to comment
Share on other sites

<blockquote data-ipsquote="" class="ipsQuote" data-ipsquote-username="stratusfaction" data-cite="stratusfaction" data-ipsquote-contentapp="forums" data-ipsquote-contenttype="forums" data-ipsquote-contentid="25170" data-ipsquote-contentclass="forums_Topic"><div>Did anyone see Impact tonight? If so, what was Dixie's BIG ANNOUNCEMENT?</div></blockquote><p> </p><p> Unfortunately Dixies "big announcements" tend to be "shrug your shoulders announcements" so I'm not holding out any hope on it being something worth getting hyped for (burned too many times with TNA announcements in the past).</p>
Link to comment
Share on other sites

<blockquote data-ipsquote="" class="ipsQuote" data-ipsquote-username="stratusfaction" data-cite="stratusfaction" data-ipsquote-contentapp="forums" data-ipsquote-contenttype="forums" data-ipsquote-contentid="25170" data-ipsquote-contentclass="forums_Topic"><div>Did anyone see Impact tonight? If so, what was Dixie's BIG ANNOUNCEMENT?</div></blockquote><p> </p><p> Magnus Coronation Next Week</p>
Link to comment
Share on other sites

<blockquote data-ipsquote="" class="ipsQuote" data-ipsquote-username="Jaysin" data-cite="Jaysin" data-ipsquote-contentapp="forums" data-ipsquote-contenttype="forums" data-ipsquote-contentid="25170" data-ipsquote-contentclass="forums_Topic"><div>I actually hope you're right. As many times as that storyline has been run, maybe someone will get it right for once.</div></blockquote><p> </p><p> People have been fascinated with this storyline for twenty years. TNA has ran it what seems like every six months since before there could even be an "old" school TNA. </p><p> </p><p> I personally don't get the appeal of Magnus. I'm glad they are pushing a homegrown guy and he's been with the company since what 08? Its just he was always just around in this faction or in that team and then he's in the Main Event Mafia which I'm still not sure why since he never had been anything near a main eventer or a world champion at at that point. </p><p> </p><p> None the less I'm a big believer in guys don't have to have some "rub" you can make a guy in one night by beating your world champion. I strongly believe a guy you have never seen wrestle in your life can walk into a company and if he looks like a world champion and pin your world champion and do more for the new guy, the former champion and the company. </p><p> </p><p> However TNA makes things so F'N convoluted all the time. Why do we need a heel turn that EVERYBODY saw coming. Now you have Magnus as this new World Champion and he has Dixie Carter as his mouthpiece? </p><p> </p><p> I'm all for them moving forward with Magnus as their champion which btw Magnus is the first British World Champion in modern pro wrestling. Its just sad that TNA after all of these years and after all of these people in charge SOMEONE in that company (at this point it has to be Dixie) is still in favor of these stupid ways of trying to put their top talent over.</p>
Link to comment
Share on other sites

<blockquote data-ipsquote="" class="ipsQuote" data-ipsquote-username="Stennick" data-cite="Stennick" data-ipsquote-contentapp="forums" data-ipsquote-contenttype="forums" data-ipsquote-contentid="25170" data-ipsquote-contentclass="forums_Topic"><div>I'm all for them moving forward with Magnus as their champion which btw Magnus is the first British World Champion in modern pro wrestling. Its just sad that TNA after all of these years and after all of these people in charge SOMEONE in that company (at this point it has to be Dixie) is still in favor of these stupid ways of trying to put their top talent over.</div></blockquote><p> </p><p> Is he really though? I mean, Ireland is part of the British Isles, but we'll assume they're discounting Sheamus. Nigel won the ROH title, but I guess that doesn't count but the TNA belt does, since TNA is a slightly bigger company (Nigel did defend internationally, too)? Chris Adams also won the WCWA world heavyweight title from Rick Rude in 1986 in front of eleven thousand people, but I guess that doesn't count either.</p><p> </p><p> Anyway I'm morbidly curious where all of this TNA stuff is going. I like ECIII, and I like the idea of Magnus being built as a homegrown guy, but TNA is notoriously bad at making their "homegrown" guys look important after they drop the world belt. I mean, Exhibit A is Joe, Exhibit Z is Bobby Roode. Still on the roster, but just kind of there.</p>
Link to comment
Share on other sites

<blockquote data-ipsquote="" class="ipsQuote" data-ipsquote-username="lazorbeak" data-cite="lazorbeak" data-ipsquote-contentapp="forums" data-ipsquote-contenttype="forums" data-ipsquote-contentid="25170" data-ipsquote-contentclass="forums_Topic"><div>Is he really though? I mean, Ireland is part of the British Isles, but we'll assume they're discounting Sheamus. Nigel won the ROH title, but I guess that doesn't count but the TNA belt does, since TNA is a slightly bigger company (Nigel did defend internationally, too)? Chris Adams also won the WCWA world heavyweight title from Rick Rude in 1986 in front of eleven thousand people, but I guess that doesn't count either.</div></blockquote><p> </p><p> Someone else may be able to better answer, but as I understand it Sheamus is from the Republic of Ireland, which is not part of Great Britain. And the WCWA World championship was a world title in name only, having never met the "official" requirements of being defended in 3(?) countries.</p><p> </p><p> You are spot on on Nigel though. He's from London, and when he held the ROH World title it had already been defended internationally and met the requirements to be considered a world title. Not sure why he is getting overlooked.</p>
Link to comment
Share on other sites

<p>I guess if you consider ROH a world championship then it is Nigel but honestly TNA is much bigger when you factor in how much they focus in on the UK scene as well as India, they TV deals they have in place, the money they have. </p><p> </p><p>

If you count ROH's championship as a world championship then yes its Nigel but honestly ROH is an incredibly small United States based company and no matter where they defend their title it shouldn't get world title status. Neither should TNA's but atleast they have a good sized media presence in multiple foreign regions. </p><p> </p><p>

Again its all kind of semantics really. </p><p> </p><p>

The WCWA was certainly not a world title and Sheamus is from the Republic of Ireland so yeah its Nigel or nobody.</p>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<p>The next 6 months are going to be a testament to whether TNA can genuinely build stars.</p><p> </p><p>

With AJ and Hardy probably out the title picture for a while, Sting wrapped up in a feud with EC3 and Angle down and out after losing to Roode they're running really low on challengers.</p><p> </p><p>

Off the top of my head, the only possible top level faces to challenge Magnus are Joe, Aries, Anderson and at a push Park - possibly Gunner but that's a real long shot.</p><p> </p><p>

There's not a lot of drawing power there currently and the onus is going to be hugely on how well they can sell the story of Magnus as champ to make up for this.</p>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<p>I think that is just how the rules have always applied. If the belt is defended in a certain number of countries (regardless of company stature) it is considered a "World" title. Nigel McGuinness was the last Brit to win a World Championship and should be seen as such. If I remember correctly, the ROH World title has been defended on 3 different continents (America, Europe & Asia) and 11 countries (America, UK, Germany, Canada, Switzerland, Austria, Mexico, Japan, Ireland, Italy, and Spain).</p><p> </p><p>

Magnus as the first British guy to hold a World title in Pro wrestling is just a marketing ploy from TNA because they know how popular it is over here.</p>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<p>I think that is just how the rules have always applied. If the belt is defended in a certain number of countries (regardless of company stature) it is considered a "World" title. Nigel McGuinness was the last Brit to win a World Championship and should be seen as such. If I remember correctly, the ROH World title has been defended on 3 different continents (America, Europe & Asia) and 11 countries (USA, UK, Germany, Canada, Switzerland, Austria, Mexico, Japan, Ireland, Italy, and Spain).</p><p> </p><p>

Magnus as the first British guy to hold a World title in Pro wrestling is just a marketing ploy from TNA because they know how popular it is over here.</p>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Magnus as the first British guy to hold a World title in Pro wrestling is just a marketing ploy from TNA because they know how popular it is over here.

 

This. Exactly this.

 

Even if someone proves that they are technically incorrect, TNA can always say "well, we don't recognize other World Championships that aren't ours", so the argument over if he's really the first British world champ is a moot point. He's TNA's recognized World Title's first British champ.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<blockquote data-ipsquote="" class="ipsQuote" data-ipsquote-username="Sons of Kohral" data-cite="Sons of Kohral" data-ipsquote-contentapp="forums" data-ipsquote-contenttype="forums" data-ipsquote-contentid="25170" data-ipsquote-contentclass="forums_Topic"><div><p> </p><p> Even if someone proves that they are technically incorrect, TNA can always say "well, we don't recognize other World Championships that aren't ours", so the argument over if he's really the first British world champ is a moot point. He's TNA's recognized World Title's first British champ.</p></div></blockquote><p> </p><p> And one can make the case that's how it ought to be anyway. In a place like Ring of Honor, one can be a world champion elsewhere and that can be appreciated. But it's not quite the same as being Ring of Honor champion. Which in their eyes is the very best in the world at that moment in time. Or at least that's how it's perceived in story world terms. If TNA is to be the promotion their broadcasters suggest they want to be, they should really take the same view. WWE certainly takes that view. Maybe to extremes sometimes as they aren't always as good about respecting outside titles as someone like RoH is. </p><p> </p><p> Recognizing other championships can suggest those other titles are more important and those other companies more valuable a viewing experience depending on how you do it. For a company that often comes off a little too fledgling despite trying to sell itself as a center of the wrestling universe, taking the view that their world title is THE world title is probably best. Seeing that it avoids the mess of trying to decide how much credence to give other people's belts.</p>
Link to comment
Share on other sites

<p>In regards to companies calling titles World Titles, I always just rather assume it relates to their roster, not particularly where they defend the title. The person is the World champion because in kayfabe rosters would typically have THE top competitors from all over the world competing for it. </p><p> </p><p>

Kayfabe is real, dammit. The top guy is the best because every company has the best worldwide roster assembled (assuming they pretend no other wrestling companies exist...which is usually how they play things) and they are the best of the best.</p><p> </p><p>

No, I can't explain what a United States champion is with this logic.</p>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<blockquote data-ipsquote="" class="ipsQuote" data-ipsquote-username="DaMegaFish" data-cite="DaMegaFish" data-ipsquote-contentapp="forums" data-ipsquote-contenttype="forums" data-ipsquote-contentid="25170" data-ipsquote-contentclass="forums_Topic"><div>In regards to companies calling titles World Titles, I always just rather assume it relates to their roster, not particularly where they defend the title. The person is the World champion because in kayfabe rosters would typically have THE top competitors from all over the world competing for it. <p> </p><p> Kayfabe is real, dammit. The top guy is the best because every company has the best worldwide roster assembled (assuming they pretend no other wrestling companies exist...which is usually how they play things) and they are the best of the best.</p><p> </p><p> No, I can't explain what a United States champion is with this logic.</p></div></blockquote><p> </p><p> Honestly, United States does make sense to be a secondary championship in that regard. Far more so than an "Intercontinental" title.</p>
Link to comment
Share on other sites

<blockquote data-ipsquote="" class="ipsQuote" data-ipsquote-username="jjohns44" data-cite="jjohns44" data-ipsquote-contentapp="forums" data-ipsquote-contenttype="forums" data-ipsquote-contentid="25170" data-ipsquote-contentclass="forums_Topic"><div>Did anyone see the eerie resemblance to Christian Bale's Patrick Bateman(American Psycho) in Samuel Shawn. Next hell be coming to the ring to Genesis playing telling Christie Hemme the history of Phil Collins' albums.</div></blockquote><p> </p><p> I was thinking the exact same thing when I saw his match tonight.</p>
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...